Oh just hush up!
Posted on 10/10/2021 4:30:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
Jews and Christians can pray on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Why is that news?
At the conclusion of the 1967 Six Day War, Israel negotiated a ceasefire with the Arab countries that had gone to war against it. A ceasefire, not peace. Israelis believed that after the crushing defeat of the Arab armies and loss of vast territory, the Arabs would finally realize that they could not win militarily, and that Israel was a reality to live with, not fight against. Many believed that all that was needed was to negotiate to return the land and the Arabs would make peace. Simple.
While Israel was fully in control of all of Jerusalem, including the Old City which had previously been under Jordanian occupation (and never recognized internationally), Israel allowed Jordan to retain administrative control of the Temple Mount, with the Hashemite Kingdom serving as custodians of the mosques there. Part of that arrangement prevented non-Moslems, specifically Jews and Christians, from praying on the Temple Mount. This arrangement is referred to as the “status quo” and has governed the access to the Temple Mount in general, and specifically the inability of Jews and Christians to pray there.
This perverse situation existed for decades; Israeli security would prohibit Jews and Christians from bringing Bibles, and other religious text and symbols to the Temple Mount, with access to Jews specifically, and Christians in general, severely restricted. People were detained for appearing to pray, silently moving their lips. Any outward sign of audible prayer was prohibited. It’s unknown how many people transversed the site on which both Temples stood, praying silently, that one day public prayer will be allowed.
Well, it seems that God answered those prayers.
Recently, Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court Judge Bilha Yahalom revoked a restraining order to a Jewish man, who was “caught” praying on the Temple Mount during Yom Kippur. The judge ruled that it is permissible for Jews to pray quietly in the holiest Jewish site. Presumably this applies to Christians as well, if not in the text of the judge’s order, at least in its precedent.
In recent years, an increasing number of Jews have taken to ascending to the Temple Mount, with a growing number openly praying at Judaism’s most holy site, or at least not hiding that they were doing so. A group that promotes Jews visiting the Temple Mount reported that a record number of Jews actually prayed on the Temple Mount this summer: 4,239 Jews during the Biblical month of Av, nearly double the amount compared to the same season the previous year.
In her ruling the judge wrote, “The appellant (who was detained) is on the Temple Mount on a daily basis and is familiar with the accepted procedures at the place, and indeed admits that he prayed there. In this sense, it is clear why the respondent (Israel Police) is apprehensive and why it ordered the removal. On the other hand, it is precisely his daily arrival at the Temple Mount that indicates that this is a matter of principle and substance for him. The video I reviewed shows that the appellant was standing in a corner with a friend or two next to him, there’s no crowd around him, his prayer was silent, a whisper,” the Judge added.
“The respondent does not dispute that the appellant, like many others, prays on a daily basis on the Temple Mount, and this activity in itself does not violate police instructions,” Judge Yahalom concluded.
The judge’s ruling acknowledges a precedent which has been taking place on the Temple Mount on a growing basis. Contrary to the “status quo” which was reached with the Jordanians in 1967 prohibiting all Jewish prayer, Jews have been praying quietly in small groups in a way that’s known, and not disruptive.
The response of Israel’s diverse government has been broad. Many nationalist and religious parties and Knesset members are celebrating. On the other side, Israeli Arab Minister for Regional Cooperation, Issawi Frej, announced at the beginning of the government’s cabinet meeting that he objects to Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount. The paradox is that while Frej is left-wing politically he is not known as a particularly religious Moslem. Despite his more secular leaning, he still objects to Jews praying at their holiest site, “I support the prayer of every person everywhere, but the Temple Mount has a status quo and should be respected. Period.”
Another member of Israel’s governing coalition, the Islamic Ra’am party announced in July: “Al-Aqsa Mosque (synonymous to Moslems for the entire Temple Mount) is an exclusive right of Muslims and no one else has any right to it.”
What Judge Yahalom observed is that there is no actual law against Jewish (and Christian) prayer on the Temple Mount, but a five-decade history of orders that have created a precedent but are also seen as contradictory, if not discriminatory, based on a status quo from over half a century ago.
There’s reason for concern that Islamic and Arab nationalist extremists will respond with violence. Indeed, “protecting Jerusalem” from Jews has been the battle cry of Arabs and Islamists for generations. This goes back to 1929 when allegations of Jews storming the Temple Mount was the “excuse” for Arabs to massacre dozens of Jews in Hebron.
In addition to violence, within Israel and from outside, there could be political consequences with the Ra’am party walking out of the government if, for instance, a new law is not passed that overrides the judge’s ruling. It’s hard to imagine Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and other right-wing members of government agreeing to this, as all members of the coalition straddle very narrow lines to find areas to agree upon and keep the government together. At the moment, however, the State is appealing the judge’s ruling. A parallel controversy might happen in the Palestinian Authority with more ardent Islamic terrorist elements using this opportunity to incite violence, and delegitimize PA President Abbas and his Fatah party.
It’s not impossible that thousands of Arab rioters could storm the Temple Mount, which would lead to a lockdown, widespread violence, and closing the holy site to prayer for everyone. In this case, it’s likely that the ruling will be appealed to Israel’s Supreme Court, with Israel Police pointing to the rioters as a reason to ban Jews from praying there, again. But now, with a legal precedent that would have its own political implications.
Prayers are needed for the continued right of Jews and Christians to pray on the Temple Mount.
Bump
>>Prayers are needed for the continued right of Jews and Christians to pray on the Temple Mount.<<
To restrict prayer for Jews and Christians to appease a satanic group of people is just plain...insane!
>> Jews specifically, and Christians in general
Interesting turn of phrase.
We were told by our tour guide to not even appear like we were praying.
If Muslims initiate violence, then the rational response is to bar Muslims from the Temple Mount.
Color this a restoration of the temple
I have always found this interesting. The resolution to this is fairly simple.
Option 1) everyone who wants to pray there on any side of this, is able to do so without interference.
Option 2) Temple Mount and the Al-Aqsa mosque gets the MOAB treatment and the entire mess becomes a smoldering crater.
Choose.
The Muslim edict specifically prohibits Jews.
The ban against Nazarenes is implicit, in that you increasingly honor honor the Torah.
(I’m not making a theological point here, but a demographic one. In years past. the predominant Nazarene denominations were Roman Catholic and various Eastern Orthodox, which, in the area, disregarded much of the Bible and were (generally) more anti Semitic than even Muslims. The current nature of many Roman Catholics and certianly Protestants (who are much more common in the are than in the past) is very different.)
That’s hilarious...thanx for the laugh.
A freedom of religion thing.
Thanks for posting.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Cause for concern, but hopefully it will be ok.
Why not let everyone pray, and let the Almighty sort it out?
My first thought after reading this:
I'll take "Revelations" for a thousand Alex.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.