Posted on 10/06/2021 8:13:20 PM PDT by Solson
PFIZER LEAKS: Whistleblower Goes On Record, Reveals Internal Emails from Chief Scientific Officer & Senior Director of Worldwide Research Discussing COVID Vaccine ... ‘We Want to Avoid Having the Information on the Fetal Cells Floating Out There’
Ping.
how does this effect Israel and Jews or do they not care as much about abortion?
I doubt it affects them very much at all. I’m more concerned for the millions of Americans who have been purposely mislead.
This has been denied a million times by every mass media fact checker.
That meant it was definitely true!
And by the must-vaxxers here.
Bkmrk.
American Jews are some of the biggest donors to and supporters of Planned Parenthood.
Veritas Pfizer fetal cells ping. 😢
bump
Another whistleblower hero. Kudos for her, and bless her for her faith.
Yes....God bless and keep her.
Just sickening.
Confirmation of what we’ve been saying we’ve read/heard/seen.
Oh, but...we likely heard it on a bitchute vid, or read it on a blog.
Those who side with, and cover for the lying CDC/BigPharma and MSM, are beyond reproach.
Fetal cell vaxxers are busy pouring through Wikipedia to try and find something to smear the whistleblower with.
“Vanessa Gelman, Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research: “From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there…The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there. We have not received any questions from policy makers or media on this issue in the last few weeks, so we want to avoid raising this if possible.”
This is the first paragraph of the article and it tells me all I need to know.
“we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there...”
If it wasn’t questionable, what difference would it make? And why are you trying to hide it? Could those be the questions you didn’t want to go public?
“The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there.”
Meaning dumbing down the public so they won’t get or tell the truth? If it wasn’t questionable, then what difference would it make?
We have not received any questions from policy makers or media on this issue in the last few weeks,
So apparently you did receive questions about it?
Nothing about that paragraph gives me any trust or confidence in the company.
wy69
Its been confirmed long ago. Charts were posted of each one. They all used fetal cells. One can’t be pro-life yet push shots that used aborted babies.
Its been confirmed long ago. Charts were posted of each one. They all used fetal cells. One can’t be pro-life yet push shots that used aborted babies.
I agree and yes some of us have known this. Despicable. Disgusting.
I wouldn’t get this jab anyway but this is horrendous. Oh and they aren’t vaccines and they don’t work.
Poor little babies. Wake up America!
I asked my friend, a registered pharmacist and pharmaceutical company exec about this. She’s a very good friend, smart, honest and up-front as they come. She said she wasn’t worried about it because those cells were used in development , not many of them, and dozens of years ago. Not like getting fresh cells from recently dead babies.
For what it’s worth. Comments welcome.
Your friend might want to look into a compass realignment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.