Posted on 10/06/2021 8:56:17 AM PDT by Kaslin
This week, the University of Virginia Center for Politics released a poll surveying Americans' feelings about their political opponents. According to the poll, 80% of Biden voters and 84% of Trump voters believed that elected officials of the opposite party present a "clear and present danger to American democracy"; 78% of Biden voters believed that the Republican Party wanted to eliminate the influence of "progressive values" in American life, while 87% of Trump voters believed that the Democrats wanted to eliminate "traditional values"; 75% of Biden voters and 78% of Trump voters believed that the opposing party's supporters were a "clear and present danger to the American way of life."
These statistics are, of course, alarming. The popular theory these days is that willingness by both Democrats and Republicans to abandon democratic norms -- election result acceptance, checks and balances, due process of law and all the rest -- is purely the result of reactionary dislike. If you fear your neighbor is going to abuse the process, you'd be a fool to stick to the process -- and the more we dislike our neighbors, the more we fear that they'll take advantage of us.
But is this theory correct? Is polarization actually the reason for increased willingness to ditch democratic norms?
According to a new study from political scientists David Broockman of the University of California, Berkeley, Joshua Kalla of Yale and Sean Westwood of Dartmouth, the answer is no. They write, "We find no evidence that an exogenous decrease in affective polarization causes a downstream decrease in opposition to democratic norms." In other words, Americans hating each other less does nearly nothing to reduce Americans' willingness to override democratic norms in order to achieve their goals.
If polarization isn't driving the undermining of norms, what is? Perhaps the answer is that the reverse is actually occurring: As we've abandoned democratic norms, we've come to despise our neighbors.
This makes a certain amount of logical and correlative sense. The Founding Fathers had a particular vision of human nature, believing human beings were capable of great things but were also rife with sin and corruption. Given the variability of human nature, epistemic humility -- a recognition that human beings are often wrong -- would be necessary. And that epistemic humility would translate into a desire for liberty. High-level government, in this view, would be hamstrung from cramming down a unitary form of virtue on a pluralistic society, at least; subsidiarity, in which local communities governed themselves while the federal government maintained certain basic norms, would be the proper approach. The federal government would be pitted against itself through checks and balances, creating obstacles that would necessitate broad agreement about use of power to legitimize such use of power.
Today, however, most Americans seem to instinctively recoil from this vision of human nature and its concomitant governmental approach. Instead, human beings are held to be entirely malleable creatures of circumstance who can be molded by a better system into their highest selves. Grant the "right person" with the "right principles" unending power, democratically or not, and watch virtue spring forth. The government isn't the problem, it's the solution.
The problem with this, of course, is that we all have different ideas of the right person and the right principles. And once we have agreed that the government ought to have the ability to fix all our problems, anyone who stands in our way becomes a heretic. By abandoning the Founders' accurate characterization of human nature and the governmental structure embodied in the Constitution, we set ourselves up for polarization and rage.
Perhaps the first step toward fixing our newfound dislike for democratic norms is to re-inculcate not love of neighbor, but understanding of human flaws, human foibles and the limits of human understanding. Perhaps we ought to start with some epistemic humility. From that source, perhaps a renewal of democratic norms and an embrace of our neighbors might spring.
“Perhaps the first step toward fixing our newfound dislike for democratic norms is to re-inculcate not love of neighbor,”
This is a foolish proposition.
The only precept that allowed us to have both prosperity and freedom was following the commandment to love thy neighbor.
The big problem is that we’ve allowed the Kabbal to have any power whatsoever.
Pretty obtuse article. I think it could have been explained much more clearly.
“Polarization” is just half the lemming herd turning AWAY from the CLIFF and the ones that are STILL RUNNING OFF the CLIFF complaining about it!
Trump administration. Not one act of political persecutions of dissenting views
Biden Administration: 8 months of habitual attempt to use Government action to suppress dissenting opinions. From Jan 6th prosecutions to the attempt to use the FBI to suppress contrary opinions at school board meetings
Time to stop validating Leftist lies and point out who is really the party of oppression.
Obtuseness is Shapiro’s specialty.
Yeah, how are we going to do that when we can’t communicate with each other anymore?
Don’t remove that phrase from the rest of the paragraph...greatly changes the point.
Perhaps the answer is that the reverse is actually occurring: As we’ve abandoned democratic norms, we’ve come to despise our neighbors.
I see the problem as one of force. The left believes that they have the moral high ground and have the right to force others to live and believe the same way.
The right is still willing to let your believe what ever BS you want to ... as long as you dont force them to live and believe the same way.
This creates a difference that can not be reconciled, negotiated or accommodated UNLESS one side gives in.
Okay I’ll restate the point I should have made.
First, love God.
In loving God, love thy neighbor. That’s all we need.
The political scientists are from Yale, Berkely and Dartmouth so we can’t expect them to be careful thinkers.
Exhibit A: they conceptualize love and hate as a mathematical spectrum. Loving is equated with “hating less.”
Ben is a smart enough guy, but he is clueless in his understanding of the Left. Also of Conservatives.
The cause of our problems is that we’ve allowed the Kabbal to turn us (some more than others) away from God and God’s Law so that society has become oriented toward them and their silly little way of doing things.
Anyone who still thinks of our problems only in terms of left vs right, conservative vs liberal, or otherwise not taking the larger scenario of Kabbalist manipulation into account, is not thinking very well.
The left-right theatrics is staged. You’re being manipulated to hate your liberal neighbor so that you won’t notice what the Kabbal is doing to you.
My view is that the Left has begun to weaponize government against conservatives. In times past, they argued issues and largely retreated to their respective corners. Not so any more. When the Left assumes power, they go on offense now to eliminate the opposition. Generally, the Right does not do that, except that it is now is becoming necessary for the Right as well purely from the perspective of self-preservation. It is clear to me that the Left has declared war on regular folks like me.
All we are getting is junk mail which I can do totaly without. But you would not believe how much my 84 year old husband loves junk mail. He gets exided when he sees the mail man stop at our mail box. For years I used to have pen pals which I enjoyed, but than something unfortunate happend in my life and I stopped writing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.