Posted on 10/04/2021 1:28:31 PM PDT by RandFan
A gun control group on Monday launched a digital ad campaign pushing for filibuster reform in the Senate, arguing the procedural tool has cost lives by blocking meaningful legislation to overhaul firearm laws.
Brady, an anti-gun violence group founded by former Reagan aide Jim Brady and his wife Sarah, debuted two new ads first obtained by The Hill as part of its "#FilibusterIsKillingUs" campaign that calls on the Senate to eliminate the 60-vote threshold required for most legislation to pass.
The organization plans to spend $40,000 on its initial round of digital ads, with more outreach likely moving forward.
"In the past four Congresses, the filibuster has stopped life-saving and common-sense legislation such as expanded and strengthened background checks from passing the Senate, creating a chilling effect on such legislation even as these policies attract overwhelming support from the American public, including majorities of both parties," the organization said in a statement.
Brady has advocated for stronger gun laws for years, but with the new digital campaign it joins growing calls from progressive groups and various advocacy organizations that have pushed for filibuster reform. The advertisements use the personal stories of three gun violence survivors and Brady Campaign leaders who have been affected by gun violence.
"With the direction of politics today, we just know too acutely how tangible and impactful the filibuster has been in preventing the life-saving change that we desperately need in this country and just want to make that more clear to the American people," Christian Heyne, vice president of policy at Brady, said in an interview.
"For too many Americans, they see the filibuster as a procedural hurdle," said Heyne, whose mother was killed by gun violence. "I don’t think folks recognize there is a tangible impact occurring every day when we can’t get passed things that more than 90 percent of Americans support, like universal background checks."
President Biden saw his pleas for firearm restrictions and tougher background checks languish in the wake of mass shootings earlier this year in Indianapolis, Boulder, Colo., and Atlanta after Senate negotiators failed to reach an agreement on a bill that could garner the 60 votes needed to overcome the filibuster.
The president's efforts on gun reforms took another blow last month when the White House withdrew its nominee to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) in the face of resistance from Republicans and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine). The nominee, David Chipman, worked with another anti-gun violence group, Giffords.
Gun laws have repeatedly run into hurdles in the Senate, where the legislative filibuster requires at least 60 senators to vote in favor of advancing legislation. In the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012, an amendment to require background checks on all commercial gun sales only garnered 54 votes.
Groups like Brady have expressed frustration over inaction in the chamber, particularly given polling has consistently shown measures like universal background checks have strong public support.
The Brady campaign launched Monday is expected to be part of a broader campaign alongside other issue-based organizations calling for filibuster reform, Heyne said. Groups that support expanding the Supreme Court, codifying reproductive rights, voting rights advocacy groups and others have in recent months become increasingly outspoken about the need for filibuster reform.
"We want this to be something that becomes a rallying cry," Heyne said.
The White House has said as recently as last month that Biden does not support abolishing the filibuster or creating carve outs for issues like voting rights.
You know it...
We need to pull Sinema or Manchin to the GOP. Bring them across the aisle and all this legislative intrigue disappears.
Does that have to face a 60% or so vote from Senators, to
do away with it?
I believe it can be done with 51
“break the rules to change the rules” or something.
Reid threatened to do it repeatedly...
The right to protect one’s life is God-given. No human being has any moral standing to interfere with it.
Anyone who advocates for gun control is guilty of crimes against humanity.
But even to call the vote, you have to face cloture.
Couldn’t you use the filibuster to require that?
That’s 60 votes.
I’m spit balling here, so maybe you have a good answer for
that.
I don’t know to tell you the truth.
They will find some way of doing it one day.
Look at all the interests lined up to do away with it.
Big government always wins...
It's not about any of their stated BS, it's always been about disarming all Americans.
What I would prefer is that filibuster became permanent and ALL legislation required 2/3s of the Senate to approve - and nothing ever gets passed.
We will find that the “end of the filibuster” becomes the beginning of CWII.
Yeah, I hear ya...
Saw one Leftist site citing the Federalist Papers while
denigrating the filibuster as not in conformity to the
Founding Principles.
Found that rather humorous.
These people have no shame. They trash our Founders
and Founding Principles non-stop.


This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
The 2nd Amendment says “shall not be infringed”, there is already way too my infringing going on.
My=much
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option
Reid used it once to confirm Obama fed judges, McConnell did it once to stop Garland being confirmed. At the bottom of the article is the proposed use for legislation. Take it with a grain of salt, it’s wiki.
Freegards
Thank you.
The filibuster, as a time-honored procedure which guarantees that the voice of the minority, will at least, be heard.
We already know that government officials don't even pretend to represent the wishes of their constituents until just before re-election time,
essentially, they represent the wishes of the lobbyists who contribute money towards government officials re-elections.
If this helps bring about critical mass and The Second American Revolution, count me in.
Let’s Roll.
If we only had enough laws, crime would go away.
Maybe when Feinstein croaks there will be a move to do it “for Diane.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.