Posted on 09/17/2021 1:54:37 PM PDT by Jacob Kell
(CNN) - A judge in Wisconsin sided with defense attorneys Friday and denied motions filed by prosecutors seeking to admit evidence at trial showing Kyle Rittenhouse's involvement in a previous fight and his alleged association with the Proud Boys.
Among their multiple motions filed, prosecutors were hoping to admit evidence Rittenhouse had an association with the Proud Boys, a group linked to political violence.
In January, Rittenhouse pleaded not guilty to two felony charges of homicide in the deaths of Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, and felony attempted homicide for wounding Gaige Grosskreutz during protests in August 2020, following the police shooting of Jacob Blake.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
“...Please disregard my previous post....”
-
Why?
Because I botched it. Failed to post address, or excerpt.
Why would that be admissible? It has nothing to do with this incident.
Bring in the guy he shot.
Ask him “Were you chasing him? Did you also have a gun? What was your intention if you caught him?”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/27/proud-boys-leader-enrique-tarrio-fbi-informant
Kyle ought to go on the offensive with his legal team and SUE THE PANTS OFF HIS ATTACKERS.
Demand $1 million each from the three of them, (or their estates.) That’s the only thing the left understands - attack!
What violence, political or otherwise, have the proud boys ever done?
“What violence, political or otherwise, have the proud boys ever done?”
Proud Boys defended themselves against BLM racists and neo-Nazi Antifa who wanted to kill them. Defending oneself from thugs who want to murder you is violence. (Oops! I better add the Sarcasm tag multiple times.)
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Interesting threesome.......
Gotta love the loaded innuendo in such sloppy language: "a group linked to political violence". I mean they can't possibly be proven wrong, even if no Proud Boy was ever the aggressor or did anything wrong, CNN and other media have certainly linked them to political violence. But hey, the term is loaded to imply the worst.
Way to be a creepy propaganda rag, CNN. The true toilet of journalist ethics!
But but white supremacist.
Well they are constantly attacked by antifa. So they are linked to politcal violence.
##Bring in the guy he shot.
##Ask him “Were you chasing him? Did you also have a gun? What was your intention if you caught him?”
That is pretty much what I was thinking. The long form vid of the incident is pretty clear. He had shots that were absolutely justifiable IMO that he didn’t take. There were sequence in there that he showed situational awareness that I probably wouldn’t have had in the situation where he withheld fire when I probably would not have. Any honest jurty is gonna let him walk. An actual honest jury would give him a medal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.