Biden administration will pursue federal charges against anyone trying to stop a woman getting an abortion in Texas protect clinics 'under attack', AG Merrick Garland says

DAILY MAIL ^ | 06 SEPTEMBER 2021 | AP

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

The Justice Department said Monday that it will not tolerate violence against anyone to obtain an abortion in Texas as federal officials continued to explore options to challenge the new state law that bans most abortions.

Attorney General Merrick Garland said the Justice Department would 'protect those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services' under a federal law known as the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act.

Garland said in a statement that federal prosecutors are still urgently exploring options to challenge the Texas law.

[gitmo]

Nobody is threatening violence against those women. But the women are planning lethal violence against their own children.

[Jim W N]

The feds and Biden have ABSOLUTELY NO constitutional validation or right to force states to allow abortions.

Fight these jackals!

[Fido969]

Compare Garland’s dedication to the Cause with Barr’s.

[RBW in PA]

But they tolerate violence from Antifa and BLM.

[iontheball]

Demonic Democrats.

[farming pharmer]

So glad this fruitcake isn’t sitting on SCOTUS. Arrest the feds that interfere with Texas law.

[Vaquero]

And the Supreme Court recently said the Texas law was legal

[SaxxonWoods]

If women don’t tell anyone they want an abortion, how would anyone know to sue them?

[Vaquero]

So it’s the feds that are starting a civil war.

[Savage Rider]

Has this Garland dude even read the law? Why would there be violence for something with a civil penalty and civil suits against the doctors and people assisting with baby killing? The law doesn’t say you can even sue the person getting the procedure. What a bunch of lying tools.

[libh8er]

The safest place for an unborn baby to be right now is in Texas. But the Left are exploring ways to kill. They won’t rest until killable babies are killed.

[frank ballenger]

That schmuck Garland....

Yes, we were without bold AG’s during Sessions and Barr.

The Dems had Obama’s goons sending dozens of officers down to the police versus violent person of color incidents, looking for some evidence of racism in any case from the past. Thousands of manhours wasted in a vendetta against police and us. Holder and Loretta Lynch.

[Savage Rider]

The SC said they would not allow a TRO on the law. They did not uphold the law because there hasn’t been an appropriate case brought to them yet.

[Tennessee Nana]

Why ???

[SaxxonWoods]

“The law doesn’t say you can even sue the person getting the procedure.”

So who gets sued? The abortion clinic? The abortionist? Why couldn’t a judge say yep, the clinic loses, award is $1?

[livius]

I love the idea but there are things wrong with this law (such as reporting) and I’m sure it will be overturned. SCOTUS didn’t approve it but only said that they get didn’t have standing.

[Maudeen]

These ingrates are asking for the consequences of these evil actions from the Lord God Almighty. Babies are His creations on loan to parents to bring them up to worship Him and spread the Gospel so that all who believe in Jesus will have a wonderful everlasting life in heaven. This world is not our final destination. . .we have a choice . . .heaven or hell. Choose Jesus.

[MinorityRepublican]

There is historical precedent. Andrew Jackson did what he wanted to do because he was the President. So Joe Biden is going to do what he wants to do because he is the President. Especially with the "Deep State" behind him.

John Roberts may had made his point. He knows what the Deep State is like. He is one of their guys because he goes to their cocktail parties in Washington, D.C. Do not be surprised if John Roberts come up with a ruling later that allows the Supreme Court to "save face". Brett Kavanaugh would be the guy to convince.

[mware]

So he’s going to arrest priests and nuns praying at abortion clinics?