Posted on 08/26/2021 7:08:09 PM PDT by be-baw
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Biden administration's Covid-related eviction moratorium.
"If a federally imposed eviction moratorium is to continue, Congress must specifically authorize it," the court wrote in an unsigned, eight-page opinion. The three liberal justices dissented.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Three liberal justices dissented
Of course They do, because it’s never about the law to them it’s always politics
Their decisions can be prejudged because you always know what’s going to happen
Roberts couldn’t run roughshod over enough others to be able to join the Libs?
Interesting string of dominoes today:
SCOTUS decision.
Kabul carnage.
Ashley’s killer revealed.
.
And for those people always acting like the SCOTUS deliberates...
All 3 Dem Appointed Judges Vote together in a bloc - again!
.
People will have to pay the rent to which they agreed when they signed heir lease. Aw, ain’t its awful?
((Yay))
Apparently 19 billion dollars a month was lost by landlords, some of whom are average people who rented their 2nd house or upstairs rooms for income. Not just professional big name apartment companies. Not that those companies don’t deserve what they offer to the renters for money——they do.
“All 3 Dem Appointed Judges Vote together in a bloc - again!”
It’s deliberate...
Huh?? Didn’t Kavanagh wanna wait again, you know, since it was eventually going to expire anyway??
Well, a little glimmer of light on a dark day.
TG there are only three of them.
Traitor Roberts doesn’t care enough about their feelings to vote with them this time?
unsigned, eight-page opinion
Actually, Kavenaugh threw Biden a bone last time and Joe just rubbed his nose in it. Kavenaugh is the one I felt most confident on this one.
I read the majority opinion. The court did not get into constitutional law; it held only that the CDC exceeded the authority granted in Section 361(b) of its 1944 enabling act, noting that preventing evictions for unpaid rent would be akin to the CDC ordering grocery stores to deliver groceries to persons at no charge, computer companies being ordered to manufacture and distribute free computers, or telecommunications companies being ordered to provide free wireless internet.
This is consistent with judicial restraint, which calls for judges to decide cases as simply as possible and without resorting to constitutional law pronouncements when another means of deciding the case, such as statutory construction, are available.
They indicated that Congress alone could impose future moratoria on evictions. But the court does not recognize that this swerves into at least two areas of constitutional law; first, the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment; and second, the 9th and 10th Amendment restriction on the federal government’s sphere within its specifically enumerated powers. Evictions are a matter of state law (except in the cases where a federal bankruptcy petition is involved). Congress has no right to supplant its judgment over that of state legislatures when it comes to state real property law, under which evictions are conducted.
indeed
What better day to announce your identity?
Now again We will find out if the white house will even care what the Supremes think.
And the AZ AG directed Maricopa County to turn over the voting machine data.
"It’s deliberate..."
I'm still waiting for spineless, bottom feeding crustacean judge roberts, to explain the "no political bias in the court system" remark...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.