Posted on 08/24/2021 7:49:16 PM PDT by Meah
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.
The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now required the vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon is proceeding with its mandate for all military service members.
But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.
First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has insufficient stocks of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — available for use.
The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product….
(Excerpt) Read more at childrenshealthdefense.org ...
They should be liable. For everyone else, if you provide something to someone that goes in their body, sell, give away or whatever, and they end up in bad shape or dead due to what you provided them, your azz is going to held responsible.
It all seems a bit fishy....
I think the new vax has to go through trials of some sort before actual approval...
Everyone is acting as though the Phizer jab available now has been fully approved.... has it or not?
Everything about covid is so politicized you can’t simply trust anything being claimed on either side.
That it will murder you. No biggie
As I understand it, it is fully approved for those 16 y/o and over.
The EUA is for 12-15 y/o and the booster shot.
Btt.
president biden today said it was fully approved..do you trust him?
I read somewhere that this approval is for a future drug and does not apply to the various Covid jabs many have taken.
That makes sense as so many vax deaths and injuries are attributed to their vax. They would not survive a process making them financially liable. Big Pharma owns our politicians.
No one can ultimately “force” anyone to be vaccinated. But if someone owns a business, controls military facilities, or runs a school they can legally demand that people entering their facility meet certain health and safety criteria and exclude anyone that doesn’t. People are required to wear hard hats, ear protection, and safety goggles in certain industrial situations for example.
People can refuse to meet the criteria and not enter the facility or they can comply. If an employer can make reasonable accommodations for them they must show evidence of this or face fines.
I can understand the fear and resistance to mass vaccination given the scientist’s conflicting messages and lack of long term studies but unless the majority of people are prepared to change the current laws by electing people sympathetic to
their position they are not going to avoid getting vaccinated at some point. So far the majority is supporting vaccinations. If the medical case deteriorates further this could change.
While it’s true that a vaccine that is no longer issued to the public under an EUA isn’t covered by the legal protections of the PREP Act, these manufacturers would still be covered under a different Federal law that applies to traditional FDA-approved vaccines: the Public Health Service Act of 1988.
Double sword. That could go for many things...guns, cars, booze, drugs, etc.
They already do.
The licensed labelled product....which is not available at present is approved. For now it appears that the only products available are j and j, moderna, and pfizer eua product.
Maybe the pandemic will ease or the virus will mutate far enough that the vaccine won’t work very well, before all stocks are used up...and it will be a moot point.
And I completely agree that one cannot trust much of the “information” out there. Both sidex.
bkmk
If enough people leave these industries be they government agencies or private employers, it will crush that industry. There will be plenty of other places to work. That's easier said than done I know but remember you can't get get unvaxed. Lastly if you don't want to get this vaccine you probably already know this is just the start of this medical experimentation tyranny. Make a stand now while the numbers are on your side.
Take a look at the video of Nancy Piglosi at her fund raiser event. Dozens of millionaires and billionaires sitting right on top of each other drinking and eating and not one of them wearing a mask. Many of them are advanced age also which puts them in the supposed higher risk category yet none of them wearing a mask. At the same time the wait staff are all waiting on them hand and foot and all are forced to wear a mask. It's a literally grotesque display of arrogance. Do you think ANY of these people have been vaxed like they are telling you to do? Since when do disgusting leftists do ANYTHING they force on others?
You can take it to the bank these arrogant commie pigs are not getting this vaccine and that should tell you something. What do they know that you don't?
The name of their vaccine sounds suspiciously like commie n ratty.
There is more to it than that
The brand name vax, Comirnaty is FDA licensed and approved, and mandates are being written based on this, but there is little to no supply (and this article speculates it will not generally be available in America until Pfizer can take care of the associated liability that approval brings)
There is, however, plenty of the “old” vaccine stock that is still only authorized for emergency use. And Pfizer is protected from liability on the EUA product
It’s a bait and switch. They want to use the power of force of the licensed product to trick you into thinking you have no right of refusal while they give you the product which by law you have a right to refuse
I believe they authorized extending the shelf life of existing product as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.