1 posted on
08/19/2021 8:54:12 AM PDT by
Hojczyk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Hojczyk
Once again, an O-hole appointee...
To: Hojczyk
Can’t be encroaching on the Middle East’s monopoly, now can we?
3 posted on
08/19/2021 8:55:50 AM PDT by
mykroar
(God speed, President Trump)
To: Hojczyk
They forgot to put Hunter on their board.
5 posted on
08/19/2021 9:01:41 AM PDT by
Dogbert41
("Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled" (Matthew 5:6).)
To: Hojczyk
No doubt opec will make up the difference right?
6 posted on
08/19/2021 9:03:01 AM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? đ)
To: Hojczyk
7 posted on
08/19/2021 9:03:06 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: Hojczyk
Aw, just go begging to the Saudis again even though they are likely rethinking the value of our friendship in light of current events
8 posted on
08/19/2021 9:03:57 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Claiming Racism, the antidote to personal responsibility)
To: Hojczyk
State and company should just move forward anyway
10 posted on
08/19/2021 9:05:24 AM PDT by
reed13k
(For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
To: Hojczyk
Was her opinion based on a proposed opinion submitted by counsel for plaintiffs?
11 posted on
08/19/2021 9:05:50 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: Hojczyk
12 posted on
08/19/2021 9:06:03 AM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Do kids in Iceland still play "The Floor Is Lava?")
To: Hojczyk
Kill cheap energy and you kill the middle class and rural communities.
One job Biden is doing very well.
13 posted on
08/19/2021 9:06:28 AM PDT by
zek157
To: Hojczyk
Who needs energy independence? Not Tali-Biden.
15 posted on
08/19/2021 9:09:43 AM PDT by
fwdude
(True shepherds carry a sling and plenty of stones.)
To: Hojczyk
Note the 'value judgement' embodied here; "... the Trump administrationâs approval of the project under the National Environmental Policy Act was flawed because it failed to
thoroughly analyze potential greenhouse gas pollution ..". This leaves the question of what, in the opinion of U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason, a thorough analysis would be?
My personal opinion is that Judge Gleason would probably opine that only a cancellation of the entire fossil fuel industry would reflect a sufficiently thorough analysis here.
17 posted on
08/19/2021 9:10:19 AM PDT by
SES1066
(Ask not what the LEFT can do for you, rather ask what the LEFT is doing to YOU!)
To: Hojczyk
Do I need to look her up to see who nominated her?
Soetero, Clinton, or one of the Bushes
I’m going with Soetero.
19 posted on
08/19/2021 9:11:16 AM PDT by
qaz123
To: Hojczyk
It also vacates a formal opinion by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that said the project was unlikely to jeopardize polar bearsâ continued existence and unlikely to harm their critical habitat.I thought this was interesting. Cancelling the project approval by the BLM should have done the trick. But this judge "vacates a formal opinion" by the FWS? How does that work? It is wholly unnecessary unless she wanted to ensure that if a higher court overturns her actions that the FWS will have to redo the formal opinion, requiring additional time before the project can restart.
Every energy company should be reviewing proposed energy projects to evaluate how likely that the Xiden administration will pull stuff like this.
To: Hojczyk
"Hey, OPEC? Joe again. I am REALLY REALLY going to need you to ship us more oil, pronto."
![](https://thejeffreylord.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Biden-Phone.jpg)
22 posted on
08/19/2021 9:12:06 AM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(âCriminal democrats kill babies. Do you think anything else is a problem for them?â)
To: Hojczyk
Unfortunately, Biden has the nukes and army brigades on his side to use against the people, so no one is touching him. There is some sarcasm in that statement, but not as much as it should be.
23 posted on
08/19/2021 9:12:51 AM PDT by
CatOwner
(Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021)
To: Hojczyk
When feds attempt to override state’s rights is it mostly a delay tactic?
27 posted on
08/19/2021 9:14:46 AM PDT by
Leep
(Save America. Lock down Joe Biden!)
To: Hojczyk
Great! Let’s rely on the Middle East, those who hate us and want us dead, for energy. Brilliant.
28 posted on
08/19/2021 9:18:44 AM PDT by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking. )
To: Hojczyk
Dunleavy should go ahead anyway, and let this hack of a judge enforce it.
29 posted on
08/19/2021 9:19:14 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Time is like quicksilver, smearing the years... - Bill Nelson)
To: Hojczyk
Hi.
“Was flawed because it failed to thoroughly analyze potential greenhouse gas pollution,”
So judge Gleason is a climate scientist?
5.56mm
31 posted on
08/19/2021 9:27:35 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
(Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson