Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rashida Tlaib blasted over claim that US supported Taliban before it existed
fox ^ | 08/16/2021 | Brandon Gillespie

Posted on 08/16/2021 1:38:13 PM PDT by chief lee runamok

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., was blasted for claiming Sunday that the U.S. supported the Taliban against the Soviet forces occupying Afghanistan in the 1980s, a decade before the Islamist group came into existence.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: California; US: Michigan; Unclassified; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; california; jimmycarter; michigan; nancypelosi; racistrashida; rashidatlaib; taliban; tlaib; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Solid proof stupidity is an incurable disease.
1 posted on 08/16/2021 1:38:13 PM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

may have more truth than folks want to admit.


2 posted on 08/16/2021 1:40:52 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Right, because Jimmy Carter had a time machine.


3 posted on 08/16/2021 1:44:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

Granting Ms. Talib a lot more than she deserves, it might be argued that we supplied funds and arms to groups that later formed the basis for the Taliban. So what? During the Cold War we supported all kinds of unsavory types. Is her position that we should not have opposed the Soviets? It was in our interests to support Afghan militias in 1980, it was in our interest to blow up some of those same people in 2001 for harboring bin Laden. What was not in our interest was the exercise in nation-building that just ended. Meanwhile, how is letting people like her into the country in our interest?


4 posted on 08/16/2021 1:46:13 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Blame Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

Oh, they existed back then but they were known by the more endearing descriptive of “Islamic terrorists.”


5 posted on 08/16/2021 1:46:54 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
Mujaheddin you dingbat. Even I know that. 🤪
6 posted on 08/16/2021 1:49:17 PM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Yep. She confused the Taliban with the loosely-knit mujahideen, but they’re essentially the same. Otherwise she’s pretty much right on the money, alas.


7 posted on 08/16/2021 1:49:20 PM PDT by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

She’s probably confusing them with the Mujahedeen.


8 posted on 08/16/2021 1:49:54 PM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

that the U.S. supported the Taliban against the Soviet forces occupying Afghanistan in the 1980s,,,,,

Back then they were the Mujahideen. They didn’t morph into the taliban until much later.

As I recall the taliban were originally “students.” I don’t think the current crop have much to do with their founders.

Sometime ago I remember reading about someone remarking to an Afghan about Taliban banditry. He replied that “it’s not that the Taliban are becoming bandits, it’s that bandits are becoming Taliban.”


9 posted on 08/16/2021 1:55:06 PM PDT by Ceebass (USA RIP 1776-2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350

She is right in concept

Didnt we train Osama Bin Laden for example.


10 posted on 08/16/2021 1:57:34 PM PDT by RummyChick (Bagram was the most logical exit point. Stand up and justify your decision (hat tip Larrytown))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ptsal
"may have more truth than folks want to admit."

True, that.

No doubt some of today's older members of taliban gained valuable experience in that "conflict".

11 posted on 08/16/2021 2:00:53 PM PDT by chief lee runamok (Anti Socialist Derelict at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
92-C3-FB74-E232-439-F-BF1-F-60-B01-A1882-B0

12 posted on 08/16/2021 2:08:03 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (‘’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350
>> She confused the Taliban with the loosely-knit mujahedeen, <<

Good point. My understanding is we supported a confederation of war lords fighting the Soviets and after the Soviets left the Taliban won in a post Soviet civil war.
13 posted on 08/16/2021 2:24:38 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
Did Pompeo agree?


14 posted on 08/16/2021 2:25:59 PM PDT by sockmonkey (Conservative. Not a Neocon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

No matter how many times the truth is told Rashida’s followers will believe what she says.


15 posted on 08/16/2021 2:40:44 PM PDT by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350

I hate to say it, but, yes, she’s basically right. I remember the CIA-backed mujahideen of the ‘80s. It’s essentially the same crew that we call the Taliban now.


16 posted on 08/16/2021 2:50:41 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok
This claim was started by the left under GWB.

During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. supported the Mujahideen. The problem was and is Pakistan. Pakistan's Inter-service Intelligence Agency took sides with and support what became the Taliban, who moved in and took over right after the Soviets left. The ISI is close to what the KGB was in terms of the power it has in Pakistan's politics. Since 9/11 the U.S. has never effectively handled Pakistan playing all sides against each other while staying in the middle.

17 posted on 08/16/2021 3:17:31 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

Well, techically, Barry Soetoro was fighting with the tolybon


18 posted on 08/16/2021 4:36:36 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

kind of makes you wonder if we’ve been played


19 posted on 08/16/2021 8:57:16 PM PDT by SisterK (Maranatha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

RacisTRash-ida.


20 posted on 08/17/2021 12:26:29 AM PDT by Humane1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson