Posted on 08/07/2021 9:07:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
A 34-year-old woman in southeast Australia has died from a rare blood clotting disease following her first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine, health officials announced Thursday.
The unnamed New South Wales (NSW) woman was confirmed to have died Wednesday from thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which was "likely to be linked" to the British-Swedish COVID-19 vaccine, Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) said in a statement.
"The TGA extends its sincerest condolences to her family and loved ones. We are in close communication with NSW health who are undertaking further investigation of this case," the TGA stated.
No other details — such as the woman's underlying health conditions — were revealed by the government agency.
"TTS is a rare event involving serious blood clots with a low blood platelet count. It is triggered by the immune system’s response to the AstraZeneca vaccine and is different from other clotting conditions," the TGA explained.
The most common time period for the onset of TTS symptoms is four to 30 days after vaccination, the agency noted.
The TGA has found seven reports of deaths likely to be linked to inoculation from 425 reports received and reviewed since the beginning of the vaccine rollout to Aug. 1, 9News noted. Six of the deaths that occurred after the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine were confirmed to be TTS cases, and one was a case of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).
Five of the six TTS deaths were women aged between 34 and 72, while the singular male death was a 44-year-old.
The woman was the third confirmed or probable TTS case reported by the TGA in the week leading up to Aug. 5, with a 51-year-old NSW woman being the second confirmed case and a 67-year-old Victoria woman being assessed as a probable case.
The cases had been assessed using the U.K. case definition, according to the agency.
"This takes the total Australian reports assessed as TTS following the AstraZeneca vaccine to 93 cases (57 confirmed, 36 probable) from approximately 6.8 million vaccine doses," the TGA said.
Severe cases of TTS appeared to be more common in women in younger age groups, the health agency said. It added that nearly half of the TTS cases in women required treatment in intensive care.
The rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine in Australia — particularly in NSW — has ramped up in recent weeks, 7News reported.
There were five COVID-19-related deaths on Thursday alone and a further 262 local cases, according to the Australian outlet.
Australia has administered approximately 12.4 million vaccine doses — broken down into 8.4 million first doses and 4 million second doses — as of Sunday, the TGA reported.
PING for info.
RARE????
REALLY???
The number of gratuitous lies in an article is directly proportional to the number of gratuitous adjectives.
For as many stories as we’ve been subjected to about folks dying and on their last breath, saying....I wish I would have got the shot....mostly, if not all, bullsh*t, IMHO. There are more, I’m betting, stories of folks getting serious side effects and/or dying from these things.
On a side note, who owns a very large majority of the stock of Pfizer/Astrazeneca? Blackrock. You know, 3 of their high level exec’s now work for CornPop. Wonder where the push is coming from, for these shots, given that they’ve made and will continue to make billions from them.
Doesn’t sound rare to me. Just uncommon.
This is Not a Vaccine.
The jab of mRNA (synthesized strand of genetic material) is a package in a nano lipid or fat envelope delivered to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful S-1 spike protein.
Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission. That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission.
The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are. And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs as a vaccine.
Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine. The jab is a mechanical device (a bio-weapon) in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site.
No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device, not a drug. The jab is not a living or biological system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.
Stated Objective
As to why the vaccine hype, the most important quote of this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a quote made in 2015 by Peter Daszak, head of Eco-Health Alliance and long-time collaborator with Dr. Fauci and NIAID on gain of function research.
In 2015, Duszak said,
“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
See Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Feb 12. 6, Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses.
It’s not hard to figure that SARS-CoV-2 was not a public health crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective. And it’s the easiest thing to describe because they are the ones that said it. And the Occam’s Razor reality is they've said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine countermeasure. And they needed the media to create the hype and investors would follow where they see profit.
When I see a person wearing a ski mask, waving a gun, and standing with a bag of money in front of a bank; I will make the assumption that that person might be a bank robber.
Similarly, if I have somebody who says we need to use the media to hype a medical countermeasure which is in fact the injection of a synthetic, recombinant chimeric protein developed off of a computer simulation, I’m actually going to listen to the motivation for why that might be being done; I will listen to the person doing the manipulation who says investors will follow where they see profit.
You do not have anything else you need to rely on to explain the events of the last 20 months than the actual statement of the actual perpetrators.
How to lie with statistics.
How about number of people vaxxed?
How about that these are the only ones they have so far admitted to?
Obviously, according to vaxxers, she must have had some pre-existing conditions like eating clumping kitty litter or something.
The AstraZeneca Covid vaccine is not an mRNA vector.
“For as many stories as we’ve been subjected to about folks dying and on their last breath, saying....I wish I would have got the shot....mostly, if not all, bullsh*t, IMHO. There are more, I’m betting, stories of folks getting serious side effects and/or dying from these things.”
Yes. That’s called a Morality Play.
There gave been all sorts of morality tale stories published by MSM regarding Wuhan flu.
Before the vaccine it was “man scoffed at Covid, called it hoax, then contracted Covid and died. Says he was wrong with his dying breath”.
Now it’s: “scoffed at vaccine, got Covid and died.”
But, the other direction does the same thing.
I started seeing these stories of: “vaccination proponent gets shot and dies” etc...
Rare is the new unexpected.
This is the kind of a junk article that is an unproven assertion and is causing some people to fear taking the vaccines. It is junk journalism that does not consider what the lady really died from. It blames the vaccine. It is not the first of this type article and will not be the last I am sure. There are plenty of unscrupulous people out there.
Bookmark
could you provide some of the “junk” and how you know it is such.
“This is Not a Vaccine.
The jab of mRNA (synthesized strand of genetic material) is a package in a nano lipid or fat envelope delivered to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful S-1 spike protein.”
Silly logic that twists itself into pretzels to oppose the mRNA vaccine.
Here you go, the easy to understand explanation from the CDC itself:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mRNA.html?s_cid=11435:mrna%20vaccine%20technology:sem.ga:p:RG:GM:gen:PTN:FY21
If we are given a more traditional vaccine, our bodies still only react to a tiny portion of that vaccine material, not to most of it or all of it, so not being given a whole or attenuated or dead virus does NOT mean it’s not a vaccine or won’t be effective.
Taking the indirect route of having our bodies make the triggering foreign material (the spike protein) in order to have our bodies then create the immunologic protection is just a different way to do the vaccination, rather than directly injecting us with the spike protein or organism with the spike protein.
The mRNA vaccine is indeed a vaccine—foreign substance given to a body to induce an immunologic protective reaction against organisms related to that foreign substance. Reduction in transmission WILL happen because the immunologic reaction occurs when the body is later challenged with the virus and mounts the learned anti-viral response and stops the virus in the body, thus reducing its transmission to others.
So spam the American press with AstraZenica in Austrailia.
They’re not giving AstraZenica in the USA.
I’m completely in utterly opposed to vaccines for a very very long time
My ex-wife behind my back took my daughter to a homeo path in 2003 for a “ naturopathic” vaccine and she got ITP idiopathic tgrombocic purpurea
Of course the stupid doctors tried to say it had nothing to do with the vaccine although she got the bruise looking conditions right after it
They told me there was nothing they could do but I rushed her to Oakland Children’s Hospital and she got a blood transfusion and recovered
The vaccine industry is the purest of pure evil satanic evil
They actually outdo the abortion industry in terms of their peer satanic evil
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.