Posted on 07/27/2021 6:10:39 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
“Trust but verify,” others will say. Unfortunately, that’s not an option in the case of Covid-19 in general and their so-called “vaccines” in particular because trusting would mean getting the injections. There’s no going back if it’s verified to be dangerous later. Besides, one can easily make the case that they’re already verified as dangerous, though their efficacy against Covid-19 itself is questionable.
It has been over a year and a half since scientists started researching Covid-19. Technically, the coronavirus has been researched for years by scientists in Wuhan and other laboratories, but that’s another issue. In the early days they could say this strain of coronavirus was new so they still had many questions. Here’s the thing, folks. It ain’t new anymore. Hundreds of thousands of doctors and scientists have been studying it for over a year. It’s unreasonable to say they need to have all the answers, but surely they have more than they’re revealing.
Below, I will detail five examples of fake science driving a particular agenda. When all of these agendas are combined, we can see the DNA of The Great Reset pushed by the World Economic Forum, most world leaders, and their various minions like mainstream media, academia, and Big Tech. Their plan is well underway and the only possible way we can stop it at this point is to inform and inspire. We must inform as many people as possible of the dangers that lie before us and we must inspire them to take actions as both individuals and as groups.
After those five examples is an article by Ethan Huff over at Natural News that demonstrates fake science in action. It’s shocking to discover that between 14%-20% of published scientific “studies” are completely manufactured, yet apparently this is a well-known phenomenon in scientific journal circles. I am not a scientist, but I can still be concerned that so much fake science is in circulation. Considering the ramifications on society during this pandemic, everyone should be concerned as well.
As you read through these examples of fake science within the accepted Covid narratives, keep The Great Reset squarely in focus. Ask yourself why they would drive us to do the various things they’re having us do and how it all ties back to the globalist agenda. Below the article by Huff, I will conclude with some more commentary.
Here are five examples of how fake science is herding us like sheep to the slaughter.
Sweden did not lock down everything. They did not mandate masks or social distancing. They kept their businesses and schools open. They did not do it perfectly, but the results of allowing the people to make choices on their own are shining very brightly right now. They’ve had 10 total Covid deaths in July and only two in the last half of the month. Their total Covid-19 death count is at 14,617. Comparably sized New Jersey has had 26,586 deaths with the harshest lockdowns in the nation.
39% of Sweden’s population has been fully-vaccinated compared to 57% for New Jersey.
One can argue that the science in the beginning was too new for governments to realize the disease was not very dangerous to otherwise healthy people under the age of 50. One can also argue they didn’t anticipate economic turmoil would cause countless deaths through suicide, drug overdoses, delayed care, unhealthy living, destitution, and a plethora of other consequences that arose from the lockdowns. One can even argue that the kneejerk reactions in the beginning fell under the political driving notion of “better safe than sorry.”
Nobody can make those arguments today. We know the disease is mild for the vast majority who are exposed to it. We know there are treatments that are being suppressed, which we’ll discuss below. We know the disease continues to spread and even spike despite face masks, social distancing, “vaccines,” and lockdowns.
We also know Sweden is winning against the disease while nanny states have been losing every battle. But fake science continues to try to convince us otherwise. Why?
From a scientist’s perspective, this may be the most egregious of the lies that continues to be told by other scientists. I’ve had conversations with doctors who scratch their heads at the notion of injecting experimental drugs into people who have recovered from Covid-19 already. Keep in mind, some of these doctors and scientists that I’ve spoken with are not against the vaccines generally, but wonder why children, healthy young adults, and previously infected people are still being urged to get the jabs.
Since the dawn of vaccine science, it has been an accepted fact that natural immunity is far superior to vaccines. In most cases, the only reasons vaccines are developed (other than to drive Big Pharma profits) is because the burdens of acquiring natural immunity for some diseases is too great. Polio vaccines, for example, make sense because the disease can be deadly or debilitating to a high percentage of those who contract it. Covid-19 has a 99.97% recovery rate for the vast majority of the population.
We need only look at SARS-CoV-1 to see that natural immunity works. The predecessor of Covid-19 has demonstrated continued immunity for at least 17-years for those who recovered from it. We can also look at the results in Israel to see that natural immunity is extraordinarily effective against the Delta Variant while the vaccines are not.
Delta Variant: Natural Immunity 700% Better Than the Vaccine
The push to vaccinate those with natural immunity should be enough to tell even the least skeptical among us that the powers-that-be are driving towards a different agenda than they one they’re telling us.
No commentary necessary. They told us for months that once they get the vaccines to the people, we’d be able to take off our face masks and resume normal activities. Look around. Does anything seem normal to you?
Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and literally every other treatment for Covid-19 has been disavowed by so-called “doctors” who are controlled by the powers-that-be. Drugs that have been in circulation for decades, that are sold over-the-counter in many countries, were suddenly deemed dangerous. Who can forget when Fox News host Neil Cavuto said President Trump was literally killing people by recommending Hydroxychloroquine?
The studies done on these treatments have far exceeded the expectations of many doctors and proven to have a higher efficacy than any of the vaccines. Early treatment is especially effective; countless lives have been saved by doctors who have prescribed these treatments to their patients.
Unfortunately, countless lives have also been lost because of the push to make these treatments anathema in the medical world. It makes absolutely zero sense unless we consider The Great Reset agenda. Universal vaccination could never be achieved if there were treatments made widely available. Moreover, the Emergency Use Authorizations necessary to push the vaccines forward in the first place require that no effective treatments are available.
Question the motives of Anthony Fauci, the CDC, the bulk of the United States government, the WHO, the United Nations, and pretty much anyone who has a say in what doctors should or shouldn’t prescribe as treatments. All of them have allowed people to die for the sake of their agenda.
Again, no commentary necessary. We’ve heard enough shifting narratives from Anthony Fauci alone on this topic to make our heads spin.
Below is an article by Ethan Huff that reveals the problems with fake science in general. After that, I’ll close with some commentary.
An article recently published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) asks the pertinent question, “Is it time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?” The answer, of course, is yes.
The reason is that the quality of “medical science” today has declined to the point of becoming an almost parody of itself, destroying the credibility of the sciences for possibly generations to come.
If we are ever again to have a trustworthy system of science, the time is now to start requiring that researchers prove their oftentimes wild claims beyond a shadow of a doubt, rather than just assume their work to be accurate simply because it got published in a “reputable” journal.
“Health research is based on trust,” reports Strange Sounds. “Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported.”
“But about 20% of the time,” said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, “they would be wrong.”
It is a grave error to continue just assuming that all health research is honest and truthful. To the contrary, it is better to assume it all as fraudulent until proven otherwise.
“Trust but verify” no longer works in the realm of science because everyone is doing the former, and very few are doing the latter. In order for scientific information to withstand the threshold of trust, it must be verified, which rarely seems to happen anymore.
One example of science gone wrong was the publishing of a study claiming that mannitol halved the number of deaths resulting from head injury. It turns out that the trials cited never happened, and the school referenced does not even exist.
“The trials were all published in prestigious neurosurgery journals and had multiple co-authors,” Strange Sounds further explains, citing Prof. Ian Roberts who spoke about this fraudulent study during a recent webinar.
“None of the co-authors had contributed patients to the trials, and some didn’t know that they were co-authors until after the trials were published.”
Interestingly, when Roberts contacted one of the journals that published the study, he was told by the editor that he should not trust the data. Why, then, did that editor and others like him publish the fraudulent study in the first place?
After identifying yet another study in which cited trials were determined to never have occurred, Roberts has come to the conclusion that all systemic reviews, particularly those that involve mostly multiple small trials, should not be trusted. (RELATED: Fake science is everywhere these days.)
Rather than combine small, single-center trials into systematic reviews, Roberts says they should be discarded entirely. There is simply too much fake science emerging nowadays to continue allowing this format to persist as being credible.
Anesthetist John Carlisle analyzed some 526 trials submitted to the journal Anesthesia, discovering that 73 (14 percent) had false data. Another 43 (eight percent) Carlisle categorized as “zombie.”
In analyzing 153 studies with individual patient data, Carlisle found that 67 (44 percent) had untrustworthy data and 40 (26 percent) were zombie trials. Many of these fraudulent trials came from countries like Egypt, China, India, Iran, Japan, South Korea and Turkey.
Prof. John Ioannidis confirmed this, finding that of the trials containing individual patient data that were submitted to Anaesthesia, 100 percent of the ones from Egypt were false, along with 75 percent from Iran, 54 percent from India, 46 percent from China, 40 percent from Turkey, 25 percent from South Korea, and 18 percent from Japan.
The latest news about the problem of fake science deception can be found at Deception.news.
Sources for this article include:
Ping!
Duszak, head of Eco-Health Alliance, is long-time collaborator with Dr. Fauci. For example, by October 2013, the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in Fauci’s NIAID-funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Daszak. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal in isolating and manipulating viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response as noted in an October 2013 article,"Isolation and Characterization of a Bat SARS-like Coronavirus that Uses the ACE2 Receptor" published in Nature.
Duszak in 2015 said, “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Feb 12. 6, Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses.
It’s not hard to figure that SARS-Cov-2 was not a public health crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective. And it’s the easiest thing to describe because they are the ones that said it. And the Ocham’s Razor reality is they've said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine countermeasure. And they needed the media to create the hype and investors would follow where they see profit.
When I see a person wearing a ski mask, waiving a gun, and standing with a bag of money in front of a bank; I will make the assumption that that person might be a bank robber.
Similarly, if I have somebody who says we need to use the media to hype a medical countermeasure which is in fact the injection of a synthetic, recombinant chimeric protein developed off of a computer simulation, I’m actually going to listen to the motivation for why that might be being done; I will listen to the person doing the manipulation who says investors will follow where they see profit.
You do not have anything else you need to rely on to explain the events of the last 20 months than the actual statement of the actual perpetrators.
Friday-worthy ping.
Here’s another:
Delta Variant: Natural Immunity 700% Better Than the Vaccine
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Data presented to the Israeli Health Ministry July 17, 2021, revealed that,
of the more than 7,700 COVID-19 cases reported since May 2021, only
72 occurred in people who had previously had COVID-19 — a rate of less
than 1%
In contrast, more than 3,000 cases — or approximately 40% — occurred
in people who had received a COVID-19 vaccine
In other words, those who were vaccinated were nearly 700% more likely
to develop COVID-19 than those who had natural immunity from a prior
infection — and this is largely in response to the Delta variant, which has
led to increasing infections in Israel.
It’s extremely rare to get reinfected by COVID-19 after you’ve already had
the disease and recovered; one study found the median reinfection rate
was just 0.27%
With effective treatments available, the documented high survival rate of
COVID-19 and knowledge that if you’ve had COVID-19, you’re already
likely immune to further infection, the rationale for getting vaccinated is
faltering
A recurring theme being broadcast by public health officials and the media
is that vaccine-induced immunity is superior to that of natural immunity,
but preliminary data from Israel — a country with more than 60% of its
population vaccinated against COVID-191 — is showing otherwise
(And have a look at the editor’s comments there!…)
Does anyone know of anyone with influenza or even a cold right now?
Quite the spike in the middle of summer….
“ (And have a look at the editor’s comments there!…)”
Oops, I meant the editor’s comments.
ignore… I thought I had typed ignore the authors comments.
More coffee needed.
Excellent summary of the lies.
Just a bit about fake science. Our company attempts to make new products from scientific publications or expired patent literature. About 20% cannot be replicated.
This is not difficult or theoretical science. Just Plain Jane product development, metallurgy, ceramics and polymers. And one fifth of the literature about these mundane subjects cannot be replicated??
Imagine the irreproducible results in epidemiology and social sciences.
I have a touch of a summer cold. Chasing it off, tho.
Medicine is an art. Medicine may use science to treat or diagnose. The reason we have “trained” doctors rather than computers is treatment is adjusted for each person. Saying everyone needs to be vaccinated destroys 3,000 years of medicine.
Thanks for posting the five points.
All are valid.
Just because the globalist depopulation oligarchs want to foist an experimental “vaccine” upon every human being on the planet to combat a weaponized virus the creation of which they funded does NOT mean anything nefarious is afoot.™ 🤡
Bkmk
You’re welcome!
and why they want to hold Nuremburg 2 crimes against humanity trials.
Do you know which Schwab book this is from?
The place I saw the excerpt pic, said it was from
https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Great-Reset-Klaus-Schwab/dp/2940631123
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.