Skip to comments.CNN Town Hall: Joe Biden Suggests a 9mm Pistol Ban
Posted on 07/21/2021 9:32:21 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
During his Wednesday night CNN town hall, President Joe Biden talked about a “push to eliminate” 9mm pistols that have an ammunition capacity beyond that of which the left approves.
Biden said, “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous. I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Donate by Credit Card or PayPal or mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Biden probably doesn’t even know what “9mm” even means.
9 M&M's? But he doesn't want the brown ones.
9mm Kurtz or Parabellum?
When the Resident speaks this way it only reinforces the reason to have weapons with what the left considers high capacity. To me, they are normal capacity mags.
past tense: infringed; past participle: infringed actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
It is right there in the Bill of Rights - ...shall not be infringed.
No way such a proposal (really any "gun control") is Constitutional. I will never, repeat never surrender a firearm, magazine, or ammunition. I recognize no authority that attempts to coerce such action. Anyone attempting such will be regarded as a common brigand.
Introducing the new 8.99mm round.
Biden is the perfect example of the phrase: the higher the circus monkey climbs, the more you see his ass.
Another gun grabbing democRat who has no idea what he’s talking about.
The organ grinder in his brain broke down.
“Biden probably doesn’t even know what “9mm” even means.”
He comes across to me as the dumbest president in my lifetime.
They handcuff the cops, then open up the prisons and borders and now they want to take away your means of self defense.
Well, there’s a lot more to not know, these days. /psaki
Actually, in 2A I put a greater emphasis on the word “the”, as in “the right to ...”, which clearly refers to a right already in existence before to writing of 2A. The rest of 2A just gives some context as to why it’s important along with a promise not to infringe upon it. But 2A neither grants or guarantees anything. We already had that right and it’s up to us to protect it. And as long as we do, we will have the means to guarantee that and all our other rights.
that actually sounds like a Donald Rumsfeld Saying, or a Yogism
21 July: Twitter: Jennifer Epstein: What the Biden CNN town hall looks like from the back of the auditorium:
no doubt CNN was trying to show big crowd with everyone packed into the front seats...but what about social distancing?
I suggest a Joe Biden ban.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.