Posted on 07/03/2021 5:04:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I was always suspicious of the constitutionalist credentials of Justice Kavanaugh, but I had such high hopes for Amy Coney Barrett ... she turned out to be the biggest disappointment of all, from her first decision on the November 2020 elections to this one.
Facebook and Twitter can have terms of service but bakers and florists can’t.
So if a floral shop refuses to serve a gay wedding, and the Supreme Court says it must, I get the tort.
But what’s the damage?
Does the shop have to pay for another shop to provide services? Makes no sense.
This is all bullcrap.
Stinking fekking cowards. So much for Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett’s originalist credentials.
Roberts needs a nice comfy pillow. Like the kind Scalia last had.
Bingo! Excellent point. Just raise your price for the sodomites, make them pay for their immorality.
I still maintain that the First Amendment argument is incorrect because there is too much interpretation around the idea of the exercise of religion. I think this entire argument should be around the 13th Amendment because forcing someone to work against his/her will is slavery/involuntary servitude. Make the ACLU defend slavery which is what they’re effectively doing.
In future just deliver dead...or soon to be dead...flowers to a perv “wedding”. When they complain apologize and offer a full refund. Problem solved.
Don’t give a Reason for denying them Service, JUST SAY NO
So in only three years is the court throwing out its decision in the Colorado baker case? With Trump’s new appointments being the ones who made the difference?
Excellent point!
Leave Amy Comey Traitor alone.
I agree, it should also be used against the Federal Reserve Corporation, forcing people to pay interest on money loaned into society that they are Forced by Law to Use, is an act of Involuntary Servitude, especially since the Interest can only be paid for by the blood and sweat of labor, for the Interest owed on the National Debt was NEVER CREATED and does NOT EXIST
“Facebook and Twitter can have terms of service but bakers and florists can’t.”
Excellent point.
Wiki:
On June 25, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Washington for further consideration in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision.[26][27] On June 6, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Stutzman again, finding no evidence of religious animus.[28][29] Stutzman’s attorneys once again requested the U.S. Supreme Court to take her case,[30][31] but certiorari was denied in July 2021.[32]
The Court is telling you to write a law protecting Americans from SJW and the Gay Mafia.
Since when did a state (or even federal) anti-discrimination law trump the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution?
This should have been a lay-up for Kavanaugh and Barrett.
CAtholics are usually not very conservative.
Our republic is so decrepit that flower arranging is a state and federal judicial matter.
Sorry, I have freedom of association. That includes business.
We’re circling around the drain while China accelerates its plans for our demise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.