Sadly, I don’t think Soros’ DA’s are interested in fair or impartial fights.
Posted on 07/01/2021 1:47:14 PM PDT by Levy78
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A man who previously said he shot and killed a protester out of self defense in downtown Austin in July 2020 has been indicted on felony charges of murder and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and a misdemeanor charge of deadly conduct, according to a statement from his lawyer.
The lawyer says Daniel Perry posted a $300,000 bond and has been released from custody.
Perry “will vigorously fight all of these charges,” the lawyer says. Police identified the man killed in the July 25, 2020 shooting as Garrett Foster.
Austin Police identifies man killed in shooting during downtown protest Saturday According to APD’s description of the incident, a car turned on Congress Avenue near 4th Street at 9:51 p.m. into where a group of protesters was marching against police violence. Protesters surrounded the car. Foster was armed with an assault-style weapon and was one of the protesters who surrounded the car.
Former Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said that’s when the driver fired five shots from inside the vehicle, hitting Foster multiple times. Foster never fired a shot. Another protester then shot at the car three times but did not hit anyone.
(Excerpt) Read more at kxan.com ...
The gubernator should pardon this guy to spare him the expense and stress of trial.
“Abbott should offer a blanket pardon for him?”
Be interesting if Texas passed a law against political prosecutions - to reign in DAs like this bitch.
Sadly, I don’t think Soros’ DA’s are interested in fair or impartial fights.
Good stuff!
The court case will likely hinge on whether the evidence shows the person killed was demonstrating ""Deadly Conduct" or "Disorderly Conduct" as defined by Texas's penal code.
Proving the killed person was showing 'deadly conduct' should acquit the one being charged while proving 'disorderly conduct' will probably bring him a felony conviction.
Your first sentence is stupid and doesn’t mean one damn thing. Smarten up!
It was in response to a contention that the deceased was about to commit murder. Pure speculation.
So he’s one of those who is part of the Soros Cabal to take down America by creating rampant crime.
You may be right.
Re: Texas penal codes: 22.05 Deadly Conduct & 42.01 Disorderly Conduct.
I believe the prosecution will try to prove that the one killed was "acting disorderly", which probably does not justify him being shot and killed. The defense will try to prove that the person killed was displaying "deadly conduct", which should acquit the person being charged.
See my post 64.
The leftists and their Democrats stooges goal is to make self defense illegal.
By the time they’re done with Perry he’ll be flat broke, in debt and they will have seized all his assets just to pay his legal defense.
One of the primary rules is you never point a firearm at anything you don't intend to shoot/destroy.
That means if you point a firearm at me, you mean to shoot and kill me. As such, I should fear for my life and have a right to defend myself with deadly force, as my life is in immanent danger.
If the jury is educated on firearm safety the verdict should be rendered in just a couple minutes of deliberation.
There was no such contention idiot.
If a gun is pointed at a person a reasonable person can act in self-defense if he believes he is faced with possible death or great bodily harm.
Later.
BLMer about to murder Sgt. Perry.
Sounds like a speculative contention to me. We don’t even know if there was a round chambered in the rifle, do we?
If a car is a threat to people, would it not be reasonable for someone to raise a firearm in defense of those lives, just as it is reasonable for the driver to defend himself from said raised firearm? The space in between those two scenarios is where the prosecution and defense will battle it out.
Many of the posts on this thread indicate that people need to adjust their thinking to fit the new tyrannical paradigm.
I hope that I haven’t unduly strained your vocabulary or ability to comprehend written English.
These soros DAs want to make law abiding citizens afraid to defend themselves.
Jake Gardner, Kyle Rittenhouse, George Zimmerman, the McCloskeys.
Be a shame if that started happening to Sorospuppets...
From the way I read the details, the shooter in question had made a wrong turn of sorts and stopped. His car then became surrounded by protesters, including the BLM fool with a knock-off AK. When said knock-off AK was raised to a high-ready position is when the individual in the car assessed a life-threatening situation and took action.
The commie scumbag DA in Austin got empowered by what happened in the Derek Chauvin trial, IE the man got railroaded and the Austin DA feels the same will happen here.
You seem to be a bit more of a league beagle than I, so the assessment of the AK being brought to a high-ready position as being deadly conduct will drive this trial IMHO.
1. CHANGE OF VENUE.
2. JURY NULLIFICATION.
3. SUE FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.
Meanwhile, how many people are sitting in the DC Gulag without Charges, access to Lawyers and no Bail being offered?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.