Posted on 06/26/2021 8:59:00 PM PDT by blam
Dan Johnson is an associate professor at the School of Health and Applied Human Sciences at University of North Carolina Wilmington with apparently equal interest in politics and polytechnics. He posted a short but clear message on Facebook: “Blow Up Republicans.” The detonation of people seems to be in vogue with professors this year. As will come as little surprise to many on this blog, I do not believe Johnson should face discipline for his violent political ideations.
The detonation of people seems to be in vogue with professors this year.
Campus Reform reports objections to the handling of the controversy by the school, which only stated that “[t]he university was made aware of the post and has appropriately addressed it.” Johnson took down the posting.
Haylie Davis, a former student of Johnson’s, is quoted as objecting to the lack of more serious action and notes that the school would not be so circumspect “if the word ‘Republican’ was replaced with any other word. If the post stated ‘Blow up women,’ ‘Blow up homosexuals,’ ‘Blow up Catholics,’ etc.”
That is a good point. We have discussed the sharply different treatment given statements by faculty depending on their political or social perspectives.
I have defended faculty who have made similarly disturbing comments denouncing police, calling for Republicans to suffer, strangling police officers, celebrating the death of conservatives, calling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters and other outrageous statements. These comments were not protested as creating an “unsafe environment” and were largely ignored by universities. However, professors and students are routinely investigated, suspended, and sanctioned for countervailing views. There were also controversies at the University of California and Boston University, where there have been criticism of such a double standard, even in the face of criminal conduct. There was also such an incident at the University of London involving Bahar Mustafa as well as one involving a University of Pennsylvania professor. Some intolerant statements against students are deemed free speech while others are deemed hate speech or the basis for university action. There is a lack of consistency or uniformity in these actions which turn on the specific groups left aggrieved by out-of-school comments. There is also a tolerance of faculty and students tearing down fliers and stopping the speech of conservatives. Indeed, even faculty who assaulted pro-life advocates was supported by faculty and lionized for her activism.
As we have previously discussed (with an Oregon professor and a Rutgers professor), there remains an uncertain line in what language is protected for teachers in their private lives. A conservative North Carolina professor faced calls for termination over controversial tweets and was pushed to retire. Dr. Mike Adams, a professor of sociology and criminology, had long been a lightning rod of controversy. In 2014, we discussed his prevailing in a lawsuit that alleged discrimination due to his conservative views. He was then targeted again after an inflammatory tweet calling North Carolina a “slave state.” That led to his being pressured to resign with a settlement. He then committed suicide
The efforts to fire professors who voice dissenting views on various issues including an effort to oust a leading economist from the University of Chicago as well as a leading linguistics professor at Harvard and a literature professor at Penn. Sites like Lawyers, Guns, and Money feature writers like Colorado Law Professor Paul Campus who call for the firing of those with opposing views (including myself). Such campaigns have targeted teachers and students who contest the evidence of systemic racism in the use of lethal force by police or offer other opposing views in current debates over the pandemic, reparations, electoral fraud, or other issues.
It is not just universities. Almost on the one-year anniversary of its condemning its own publication of a column by Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark. (and forcing out its own editor), the New York Times published an academic columnist who previously defended the killing of conservative protesters. Over at the Washington Post this week, the newspaper promoted a columnist, Karen Attiah, who last summer caused an outrage after she tweeted “White women are lucky that we are just calling them Karens. And not calling for revenge.”
Despite the bias and hypocrisy shown by universities, I still would defend Johnson and his right to express such views on social media. Unfortunately, such hyperbolic and violent language is common today. While academics should be examples of greater tolerance and civility, the danger of such regulation is greater than the cost of such speech. Indeed, this week, the free speech community secured a significant victory in the ruling in Mahonoy on out-of-school speech by a high school student.
The failure of many on the left to support diversity of viewpoints does not mean that the rest of us are relieved of our own obligation to support free speech. While many of us are repulsed by Professor Johnson’s dreams of blowing up Republicans, sanctions on such speech could easily become a nightmare for free speech.
“Professor”, “University”......nough said.
IMO pyrotechnics would work much better.
Defund “academia”
do we need much more proof that the left- well, many anyways, are mentally unstable and perhaps dangers to society?
Where are all the ‘red flag’ raids on these people? They’re all self-reporting, so what’s the delay?
Although as a principal the cancel madness is wrong, I’m not able to make myself greatly concerned when it hits those that fed it.
My gaydar is pegging.
This demented weirdo is on the growing list of “professors” who need to be canceled.
why havent they arrested him .
for death threats ?
I know this comments are made flippantly with little appreciation for their gravity, but I don’t think they realize how they are received. As violence continues to escalate, threats are taken very seriously. A preemptive response becomes more and more of a real danger. I am certain the good professor wasn’t cognizant of that reality when he mindlessly blathered. It’s a time for adult thinking and and adult accountability.
He is either Black or a Democrat. Maybe both. That is why he is not arrested. You been around long enough to know that Burt. You know how the game is played.
A blog.
Anybody that looks like that can’t be anything else but a queer. Probably a Republican turned down his offer for a b.J.
A white leftist, of course. The most dangerous people in America today - the people who are destroying America - are white leftists and liberals.
Yet another violent psychopath professor.
He’s one of those guys who looks like a 50 year old little boy.
The people making such comments are useful idiots. But the perniciousness of useful idiots should not be underestimated.
In all probability, this particular useful idiot wanted only to "virtue signal." He knew that no one would take the prattling of a grinning fool wearing that Aloha Shirt for his official faculty photo seriously.
So he thought that he'd be "in the clear."
However, he must be aware that there are others who would feel encouraged to "take action."
Regards,
He’s a fag, Jim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.