Posted on 06/25/2021 5:20:47 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Perhaps your Hebrew skills are greater? I greatly anticipate your interpretation of the study results!
It was never about the CCP-1984 weaponized virus.
It was always about genocide-by-vaccine.
Profanity, personal attack, failure to support your position.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
Chris Masterjohn
So it looks like Pfizer only tested most organs for their vaccine proxy biodistribution up to 48h because it only lasted that long in the liver. But the liver had max concentrations at 8 hours whereas ovaries kept increasing up to the 48h mark.
The liver stays stable from 8 to 48 hours, but the concentration in the ovaries triples between 8 and 48 hours.
Given that difference, why would it be sensible to think it disappears from the ovaries after 48 hours just because it disappeared from the liver in that timeframe?
They expected the spike protein to be subject to proteolysis, so “it was thought that there was no need to evaluate metabolism and excretion of these components.”
So, it was the lipid delivery system containing a reporter gene that was tested and shown to accumulate in the ovaries in an increasing manner without ever testing how long it lasted. But whether mRNA or spike protein lasted that long or longer wasn’t even tested.
In blood, it peaks at 1 hour and starts dramatically declining after 4 hours.
So it disappears rapidly from blood, and modestly fast from liver.
The two tissues where there are large concentrations that keep increasing right up until the end of the study are ovaries and adrenals.
Bone marrow has much less, but also has the trend of increasing right up to the end of the study.
The only organ mentioned as being studied for toxicity is the liver.
I find it baffling that anyone can consider this adequate for ruling out long-term effects in organs. The ovaries and adrenals are of most concern to me. Bone marrow on the list.
https://twitter.com/ChrisMasterjohn/status/1408303568868843521
https://www.dropbox.com/s/v2im834kdp950cm/Pfizer_ovaries_study_in_English.pdf?dl=0
Dr. Bridle, veterinarian, started this ovary/fertility myth.
Interesting that Dr. Bridle received a $230,000 grant from the provincial government to develop a vaccine using the very same spike protein that he’s been demonizing, although that might be the “big mistake” he has been confessing to.
Myth??
🙄
Yes!
Dr. Bridle, veterinarian, started this ovary/fertility myth.
Interesting that Dr. Bridle received a $230,000 grant from the provincial government to develop a vaccine using the very same spike protein that he’s been demonizing, although that might be the “big mistake” he has been confessing to.
It depends; as Rumsfeld said in another connection, on "unknown unknowns".
In particular, I suggest the following factors for consideration. And in no particular ordering by magnitude. (There may be others).
1) Source of spike proteins. This will tie into other factors later on. That is, are most of the spike proteins in the blood, caused by spike proteins presented on the surface of muscle cells at/near the injection site, "breaking off" or being released as the immune system chews up the cells which now present with an antigen?
Or, are the spike proteins released locally from all cells which absorb the lipid capsule and present spike protein, and then get chewed up?
("Proximity matters")
2) Is the concentration of spike protein influenced primarily by the blood/lymph transport to the tissue/organ in question, or by differences in the cells of each tissue in their tendency to absorb the lipids containing the mRNA?
3) Are there different rates of activation of the mRNA to produce spike protein in different tissues?
4) What is the attrition rate of lipid mRNA containing units in the blood on the way to various organs? Ditto for spike protein in the blood -- due either to newly-created antibodies, degradation by other means, or absorption by endothelial cells or any adjacent tissue with ACE2 receptors?
Where I'm going is, presumably if the effective titer of vaccine is low enough, the amount of spike protein falls completely below detection limits. All the way up to the (twice the human dose into the mass of a mouse). Is there a systematic loss of lipid as it goes through the body, or of spike protein, such that a lower dose results in only certain tissues getting a measurable does of spike protein?
And the usual objections about mice not modeling humans perfectly (for good or ill); variations between batches of the jab; low N-value for the Harvard study giving human blood concentrations of the spike; and variations in the skill of the injector (highly intramuscular vs. sloppy or unlucky placement allowing a larger share of the dose to go into the lymph or blood)...
More data at this post. I just read the post about 60 seconds ago and haven’t yet investigate the link.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3971188/posts?page=16#16
I looked for more references about the distribution of mRNA in the body and found another mouse study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525001617301569 Many of the values match the Japanese Pfizer study, e.g. highest in liver and spleen. The mice only got 6 micrograms instead of 50, so it's probably a better test. No ovaries, only used male mice for some reason.
There are other articles out there on some of the FR threads which point out the Pfizer study stopped at 48 hours because that’s when the values fell off the cliff in the liver; but that does not mean, that the same time period is the relevant time period for other organs.
No ovaries, only used male mice for some reason. _________________________
Perhaps on purpose because the accumulation in the ovaries was already known?
I smell a Liberal LIAR
5 Doctors speak out about coronavirus vaccines attacking women’s reproductive health as a form of population control
Monday, May 17, 2021 by: Franz Walker
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-17-doctors-say-vaccines-attack-womens-reproductive-health.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.