I wouldn’t elevate the NYT to that level.
Insect, VD, something along those lines.
So?
“When was the last time you had sex with your wife and in what position?” he replied. “We can trade intimate details.”
The author either stupidly or maliciously mistakes the obvious intent to inform him the vaccination question is considered to be private information, IMO.
Animals are far and above in a higher ethical sense of being than reporters.
This guy Wolff soiled his reputation and probably himself with his last “Book”. I wouldn’t trust this guy with anything he has to say.
It appears Tucker is directly over the target.
Sounds like reporter attempted to hurt Tucker’s credibility with most likely innuendo. Typical of the corrupt news.
Carlson threw in the towel with Hunter Biden. They have something on him.
Tucker Carlson has more influence than any twenty so called MSM journalists. He tells the truth. They collude openly with the Biden Administration and refuse to cover stories objectively such as their self censorship of the Hunter Biden/corrupt Joe Biden laptop hard drive. Tucker can gossip with them and bait them for his amusement all he wants. However he frightens them as a good person wielding a sharp wooden cross scares vampires. The MSM is doing whatever they can to discredit and silence Carlson. Yet his audience and influence continues to grow.
“Ben Smith”
“New York Times”
This is so obviously an attempt to discredit a man that is doing real damage to the Left.
The problem is they always use the same playbook. Make up anything at all and attribute it to unnamed sources. The folks who eat this crap up are those who badly want it to be true.
Don’t believe anything written in the NY Times, ever.
This story from the NYTimes has all the hallmarks of classic disinformation. They’re trying to sully Carlson’s reputation with Trump Deplorables and the R base. Again, don’t ever believe anything printed in the NYTimes.
How about posting from an article that doesn’t require a subscription????............Sheesh!
I stopped watching fox altogether. My take is that they are the diversion task force for the establishment. They get us focused on the details of items the establishment intends never to do anything about. We argue and argue and bluster. Then they narrow it down to 2 candidates and all goes on as it ever was. Then rinse, wash, repeat.
I could have sworn Tucker said on his show (early on when vaccines were opened up to everyone) that he had been vaccinated but he was dismayed by the left criticizing anybody who asks legitimate questions. Maybe not.
Here’s a line from the article: “But his decades of Washington relationships have produced a tiresome conversation among Mr. Carlson’s old friends about what he really stands for, whether he’s really a racist or whether he cynically plays one on TV.”
Some friends.
By the way, if anyone couldn’t read the article without signing up, you’ve probably visited the NYTimes site sufficient times (two or three) to activate that message. Clearing the NYTimes cookies can fix that. It worked for me. But search engines seem to keep making it difficult to find the cookie files, so that can be a problem in itself.