Posted on 06/17/2021 4:59:16 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
The remarks were given on a Zoom teleconference session that was obtained by The Intercept.
The meeting was hosted by the group No Labels, a big money operation co-founded by former Sen. Joe Lieberman that funnels high-net-worth donor money to conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans.
The call included several billionaire investors and corporate executives, among them Louis Bacon, chief executive of Moore Capital Management; Kenneth D. Tuchman, founder of global outsourcing company TeleTech; and Howard Marks, the head of Oaktree Capital, one of the largest private equity firms in the country. The Zoom participant log included a dial-in from Tudor Investment Corporation, the hedge fund founded by billionaire Paul Tudor Jones.
The wide-ranging conversation went into depth on the fate of the filibuster, infrastructure negotiations, and the failed effort to create a bipartisan commission to explore the January 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol, and offers a frank glimpse into the thinking of the conservative Democrat who holds the party’s fate in his hands.
Manchin told the assembled donors that he needed help flipping a handful of Republicans from no to yes on the January 6 commission in order to strip the “far left” of their best argument against the filibuster.
The filibuster remaining in place is a critical priority for the donors on the call.
When it came to Sen. Roy Blunt, a moderate Missouri Republican who voted no on the commission, Manchin offered a creative solution. “Roy Blunt is a great, just a good friend of mine, a great guy,” Manchin said. “Roy is retiring. If some of you all who might be working with Roy in his next life could tell him, that’d be nice and it’d help our country. That would be very good to get him to change his vote. And we’re going to have another vote on this thing. That’ll give me one more shot at it.”
“Roy is retiring. If some of you all who might be working with Roy in his next life could tell him, that’d be nice and it’d help our country.”
Regarding Blunt, Manchin appears to be suggesting — without, perhaps, quite explicitly saying so — that the wealthy executives on the call could dangle future financial opportunities in front of the outgoing senator while lobbying him to change his vote. Senate ethics rules forbid future job negotiations if they create a conflict of interest or present even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Manchin, notably, doesn’t suggest that the donors discuss a job, but rather says that people who Blunt may later be working with would be likely to have significant influence, reflective of the way future job prospects can shape the legislative process even when unspoken.
The January 6 commission got 56 votes, four short of the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster.
Manchin told the donors he hoped to make another run at it to prove that comity is not lost. He noted that Sen. Pat Toomey, a Pennsylvania Republican who missed the vote, would have voted for it had he been there, meaning only three more votes are needed. “What I’m asking for, I need to go back, I need to find three more Republican, good Republican senators that will vote for the commission. So at least we can tamp down where people say, ‘Well, Republicans won’t even do the simple lift, common sense of basically voting to do a commission that was truly bipartisan.’ It just really emboldens the far left saying, ‘I told you, how’s that bipartisan working for you now, Joe?’”
Manchin wants to portray himself as a conservative Democrat so the ill-informed conservative voters keep voting for him.
So Manchin calls upon his big money supporters to influence RINO Senators to join with the Democrats on controversial issues.
Why is a commission even needed? They can already do what they want in committee. They do not even need to meet to do what they want. Write a report saying Trump and Trump supporters are bad.
These RINO donors would love nothing more than to see conservatives murdered and imprisoned.
They have always seen us as a thorn in the side of the GOP that is only to be used for votes while they sell us out.
I guess he will hold up about as well as Bart Stupak did.
Say the commission deal gets made... in nov, ‘22 when R’s take both houses, said commission can be made honest yes?
Finally, the real view of the backroom deals.
What they tell voters is very different than what they tell donors and power brokers.
Like we always suspected.
“conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans”
I guess I didn’t get very far. I can’t decipher this phrase.
By my understanding, these people would WANT the filibuster, since the full-wackjob Left agenda is the only thing on the table.
Has this group been co-opted? This doesn’t sound like anything Lieberman would have wanted when he was active.
Didn't McCain and some other principled conservatives love Lieberman? We have the best government money can buy
Most of these people are not stellar in anything they do. There is no excellence. That must be a terrible and unsatisfying feeling. That's their vulnerability. Let's use it to destroy them. They are not good people.
Agreed
BECAUSE, the commission--as planned by the democrat legislation--is not bipartisan!
What cannot be discussed, as written:
--Antifa/Left wing agitator involvement
--Any hint of a false flag operation
--Government agents or informants who, acting as legitimate Patriots, suggesting/advocating violence
--Any talk of the Summer of BLM/Antifa violence
--Previous elections results objected to by democrat legislators
+1
I don’t even believe it was a “leak”. This is an attempt to try to convince voters to accept a commission to “save” the filibuster.
Yep, politics is dirty and Manchin is dirty.
Oh, shuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Set up the committee now, make it honest, later.
LOL I didn’t say to set up the committee - just putting out there that a committee can change with the balance of power.
IMO it needs to be made public and official that the trouble makers were FEDS.
That won’t happen with this commission and this balance of power.
You believe Rs are honest?
Not the ones in office now. Nope. Do you?
I knew he’d get inline with the ‘rats.
Dangle enough money or other incentives in front of him.
He was just holding out for more than a cushy job for his wife.
It’s funny to see how the left doesn’t have a 99% control of the flow of information. It’s still greatly controlled by the left, but the conservatives get their voices heard these days, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.