Posted on 06/03/2021 10:46:11 PM PDT by conservative98
'Life, Liberty & Levin' host says NIAID boss' controversy speaks to the larger issue of federal control
-------------
Former Reagan Justice Department official Mark Levin called the possibility that the U.S. federal health bureaucracy helped in some way to contribute to the creation of COVID-19 despite being tasked to protect Americans against such plagues "one of the most unimaginable ironies."
Levin, host of "Life, Liberty & Levin" and boardmember of the Leesburg, Va-based Landmark Legal Foundation, told "Hannity" on Thursday that the nature of government is to control and centralize power – and that the bureaucracy in all or most aspects is set up to be systemic in its incompetence.
"It is not just Dr. Fauci, [but] first of all, it would be one of the most unimaginable ironies in our history if the federal department responsible for protecting us from the pandemic contributed to creating one," he said, later adding that it was retired New York Times science editor Nicholas Wade who finally got the establishment's attention in regard to the potential the pandemic was caused by a leak from the Wuhan virology lab.
[cut]
On "Hannity," Levin said that the power and presumed omnipotence of the health bureaucracy is one part of a larger issue:
"This gets to the heart of the matter… Biden and the Democrats want to centralize the power: They're trying to destroy the suburbs as we speak," he said.
"They want to control healthcare. They want to control energy. He wanted to control all these things. But they are incompetent boobs. Who are these people in the bureaucracy? Nobody ever gets fired."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Hmm. All due respect, how did they protect against it?
That’s not what he is saying. He said they are the federal department in charge of it. He said it would be one of the most unimaginable ironies in our history if the federal department responsible for protecting us against the pandemic, contributed to creating it. Get it?
Hey, a guy needs a little job security. /sarc
Oh I get it.
It’s been obvious for over a year. Also obvious is they’ve done zero to protect us from it.
I heard much was redacted because the censored material was under ‘active investigation’. This was a tactic of the Clintons to keep us in the dark. Perhaps these hidden emails reveal the plot to steal the election with this Virus. You can bet that would be memory holed.
How about criminal.
The nuclear engineers in charge of the plant were carrying out a safety test. They wanted to make sure that the plant could continue powering itself (and its safety equipment) even in the even of a shut-down.
We know what that led to.
Regards,
“The emails are to Fauci as the blue dress was to Clinton”—Laura Ingraham.
It isn’t hard to get what Mark said…
Fauci needs to be retired.
Gain of function has always been used in vax development. I was shocked when Obama banned it here.. now I know why he did.
How to test my savior vax... release the virus on vaccinated people.
Do you think only one lab designed one virus. Buckle up. They’ve been busy.
Fauci is akin to the long serving and beloved fire chief...who turns out to be the village arsonist.
Not really. It seems like a large part of the FedGov is getting paid to create a problem, and then getting paid to solve it.
Starting long ago, there was already first hand, primary source documentation on all of this. Only the emails are new. Fox News was in the camp of those who wouldn’t touch it. Now they pretend they’re hearing it for the first time. The big stations avoid doing their own investigative journalism, because it might get them in trouble and it might actually matter.
The people that sell the cure also produce the disease.
Follow the money. It parallels the computer anti-virus industry, which I suspect creates the virus then sells you the cure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.