Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Designed to Rival GPS, The CCP’s BeiDou Has Been Exported to Over 120 Countries and Regions
The Epoch Times ^ | Jun 1, 2021 | Jessica Mao & Jennifer Zeng

Posted on 06/01/2021 6:51:52 PM PDT by Yong

The sales volume of ‘Made in China’ BeiDou chips has exceeded 100 million and related products have been exported to more than 120 countries and regions, according to China’s official report, which also said BeiDou’s role in countering U.S. rival GPS, as well as its significance for China’s national defense strategy, is “beyond description.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1of; beidou; beidouchips; bot; ccp; clickbait; excerpt; madeinchina; postandrun; zotthisbot

1 posted on 06/01/2021 6:51:53 PM PDT by Yong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yong

Every time we buy something made in China we increase the chances of massive unrest,and warfare,throughout the world.


2 posted on 06/01/2021 6:55:53 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Trump: "They're After You. I'm Just In The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yong

More like piggybacking on US hardware. Still, I think with 45k Starlink satellites up there, Elon will own the market on GPS accuracy.


3 posted on 06/01/2021 6:57:44 PM PDT by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yong
The U.S. has GPS. Russia has GLONASS. The E.U. has Galileo. China has BelDou.

Big friggin' deal. Each have their own secure global positioning system that can be locked down and encrypted during time of war. What else would you expect?

4 posted on 06/01/2021 6:58:41 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yong

BeiDou & BuyDung.

Smells like a shitty operation.


5 posted on 06/01/2021 7:26:24 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
StarlLink is not GPS.

There are three primary GPS satellite systems in the world right now. USA, EU and Russia. GPS systems use a small number of satellites in a high earth orbit.

Both the US and EU systems have an equatorial orbit, which covers most of the world's populated land mass and navigation routes. Russia's GPS satellite are in a polar orbit to extend coverage to the north polar region (and south polar), which is a blind spot for the US and EU. IIRC, Japan has a GPS system focused on the North Pacific.

Most US spec GPS chips will use both US and EU satellites. Most of the middle to high end air and marine GPS will add in the Russia satellites.

The primary reason China would invest in their own system is military. A secondary reason is to equip the really cheap cell phones they are flooding the third world with to match up with the Hawai (sp) cell systems they are spreading into countries.

My opinions….

6 posted on 06/01/2021 8:01:29 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yong

From the flavor of the last few orders of shrimp-fried-rice I’ve eaten, I suspected as much...


7 posted on 06/01/2021 8:07:20 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Don’t forget their biggest export BiDen


8 posted on 06/01/2021 8:07:36 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl99
StarlLink is not GPS.

You started with an assumption, I don't agree with. It's easy to triangulate where a signal is coming from with only 3 satellites. With hundreds of satellites the accuracy could be within a nano meter.
9 posted on 06/01/2021 8:24:42 PM PDT by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yong

What could go wrong.


10 posted on 06/01/2021 8:52:26 PM PDT by lurk ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Starlink is an internet broadcasting service and is NOT designed to record or broadcast users location. The system is NOT GPS.


11 posted on 06/02/2021 3:57:45 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

You have to know precisely where those 100s of satellites are to use them to determine your location. That is rather difficult to do when they are in a low Earth orbit. The reason GPS works is because the satellites are always above the exact same location. So your device knows exactly where is signal is coming from.


12 posted on 06/02/2021 4:31:17 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

GPS satellites are MEO and circle earth 2x each day. Not in same position. Just in same orbital plane.


13 posted on 06/02/2021 4:44:38 AM PDT by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meowmeow

Oh, I stand corrected, thx for the info.


14 posted on 06/02/2021 5:37:09 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

The accuracy is in the on-board Rubidium and Cesium clocks for GPS used to time the navigation signal...basic triangulation will not give you the nanometer accuracy you want. Triangulation uses the “TLAR” method...That Looks About Right. Also, GPS does not have just a navigation mission.


15 posted on 06/02/2021 6:27:23 AM PDT by USAF1985 (An armed population is a polite population...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Yep, your exactly right that I started with an assumption and also the math. First though, consumer through mil-grade GPS receivers already have the math programmed into them and use time measurement as the input into the calculation.

To my knowledge, StarLink does not have the time data programmed into the signal such that this is theoretically possible. Assume signal encoding does have the time data needed and that one has the homemade electronics to decode it out of the signal, the math is not trivial and takes awhile to work through. It would take multiple measurements and possibly needing a manual plot akin to using the advancing the plot technique used in dead reckoning.

Another mathematical method is via a sextant using time plus angle to the horizon. As with stars, this could be measured twice per day (unless it's cloudy) during nautical twilight. This would be a royal nightmare. Functionally, the StarLink satellites are moving at the speed of Ford GT vs a star moving like a VW Beetle speed. Big error is going to be introduced. The math is formidable to work through manually but is doable. Ship navigators would use an astrolabe, hour glass and many sheets of paper to do this for hundreds of years. In the 1700’s I believe it was, an English mathematician named Bowditch produced a very hefty book that shifted away from the complex math to look-up tables for each star, the moon and the sun.

With Bowditch, a mechanical chronometer on your wrist, star maps and a sextant, a skilled person on a boat can get their position within about 5-20 miles of error. On dry land that's not moving, accuracy is much better. Zero electronic anything. Perfect for the Zombie Invasion.

Also, keep in mind that the mathematics does not directly give you a point on a map and say you're standing here. Instead, it gives you a circle of position. That's because the math actually gives a position relative to the center point of the earth. When you project the point to the surface, this is a circle

Multiple measurements on multiple satellites give overlapping circles and your position is somewhere within the area where the circles overlap. Most of us have seen this on our cell phones or car nav system when driving in the mountains. Occasionally, a shaded circle appears around the car icon on the map. This is inducing that the number of satellites being tracked is less than the minimum needed to give the device's specified accuracy.

I've mentioned that the math is hard for any of the navigation options above. I've done math past basic calculus and candidly, when I got into celestial navigation I had trouble getting my brain around it. If I were to mechanically run the equations without understanding what was behind them I could certainly have just punched buttons on the calculator. My brain isn't wired that way though. Sidereal time is just plain weird to me. When I said the hell with the math detail and stuck with Bowditch, I was happy and functional.

Flash news or maybe not. For a number of years it has been well recognized that GPS satellites are increasingly vulnerable to antisatelite weapons in the event of major war. For maybe 10 years the US and EU have been talking about reactivating LORAN, which uses land based transmitters. The sides agree to the need and disagree on technical factors so no action. As an example, the US with LORAN-C had 4 or 5 transmitters in the continental US and these provided coverage for North America and for north of the equator, 3/4 of the Atlantic and 1/2 of the Pacific.

16 posted on 06/02/2021 12:18:14 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson