Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denver bar attempts to require vaccination proof for maskless entry
Hot Air.com ^ | May 18, 2021 | JAZZ SHAW

Posted on 05/18/2021 2:36:18 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: SgtHooper

Sounds like a plan. There are many creative messages for masks. Sadly, the best aren’t “G” rated.


41 posted on 05/18/2021 3:40:34 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (I prefer the challenges of life to the guaranteed existence - Prof. Dean Alfange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I will not patronize any establishment that requires “proof of vaccination” for anything.

And I’ve had the vax.


42 posted on 05/18/2021 3:56:24 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

The problem is because it is “only” 97% (or something like that) effective. Some people can still get COVID.

That said, when the large majority will only experience a fraction of 1% dying even w/o the vaccine, along with most having had the vaccine, the number of those that will die having had the vaccine is going to be ridiculously low. Low enough for everyone to get their rights back and got back to normal.

If you want the shot, go for it. It’s your choice - BUT NOBODY has the right to deny the rights and liberties of anyone else for not taking it. Emergency over.


43 posted on 05/18/2021 4:25:49 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh, now we see the news for drunks. ;)


44 posted on 05/18/2021 4:35:53 PM PDT by familyop (Third world slaves are misled to generalize distrust against friendly learners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

45 posted on 05/18/2021 4:38:37 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m sick of sheeple thinking “guidelines” and “recommendations “ are laws.

Wake up fools.


46 posted on 05/18/2021 4:40:55 PM PDT by Fledermaus (The Republican Party is DEAD! It took 160 years but The Whigs Struck Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest
Making, selling, and possessing them is a violation of Federal law against unauthorized use of a Federal agency’s seal:

Alter the seal just enough and they got bupkis.

47 posted on 05/18/2021 5:10:51 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who the hell would want to go there to pick up obviously crazy women who are there because of that restriction?


48 posted on 05/18/2021 5:58:41 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

I have 2 of those masks and wear them proudly whenever I’m forced to wear one.


49 posted on 05/18/2021 6:02:33 PM PDT by Prince of Space (Irish lives matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bet he’s on a HOA board. He’s power trippin’.


50 posted on 05/18/2021 6:07:02 PM PDT by Irenic ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Couple of questions...

Would it be a HIPPA violation to ask about and require sensitive medical information to enter?

If a baker or a photographer can be sued for not catering to gay folks, because their businesses are “public access” or whatever the weird terminology they use is, how can this bar, which is also “public access” deny entry to anyone?


51 posted on 05/18/2021 6:52:49 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Is this one of the strip bars that Colfax is famous for ?


52 posted on 05/18/2021 6:58:07 PM PDT by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proust

Nice little bar you’ve got here.

I hope the Board of Health inspectors that are being summoned don’t have to shut it down.


53 posted on 05/18/2021 7:01:45 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
anybody with the slightest graphics ability and cut and paste can find thousands of templates online to show the vaxxholes a card. For example

Need a card to show?

54 posted on 05/18/2021 7:03:48 PM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The County of Santa Clara (California) is requiring employers to keep lists of who is vaccinated and who is not.

https://covid19.sccgov.org/order-health-officer-05-18-2021-focused-safety-measures

Ascertainment of Vaccination Status. Businesses and governmental entities must ascertain the vaccination status of all personnel. Until a person’s vaccination status is ascertained, they must be treated as not fully vaccinated. Personnel who decline to provide vaccination status must also be treated as unvaccinated. Businesses and governmental entities must complete their initial ascertainment of vaccination status for all personnel within 14 days of the effective date of this Order. Thereafter, they must obtain updated vaccination status for all personnel who were not fully vaccinated every 14 days. Business and governmental entities must maintain appropriate records to demonstrate compliance with this provision.

Mandatory Rules for Personnel not Fully Vaccinated. Businesses and governmental entities must require all personnel who are not fully vaccinated to (1) comply with all applicable provisions of the Mandatory Directive on Use of Face Coverings, and (2) comply with all applicable provisions of the Health Officer’s Mandatory Directive on Unvaccinated Personnel.

Enforcement. Pursuant to Government Code sections 26602 and 41601, Health and Safety Code section 101029, and Santa Clara County Ordinance Code section A1-34 et seq., the Health Officer requests that the Sheriff, all chiefs of police in the County, and all enforcement officers ensure compliance with and enforce this Order. The violation of any provision of this Order constitutes an imminent threat and menace to public health, constitutes a public nuisance, and is punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. This Order is also subject to the civil enforcement authority established by Urgency Ordinance No. NS-9.291.


55 posted on 05/18/2021 7:09:48 PM PDT by moviefan8 (#restorethesnyderverse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson