Skip to comments.
U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-4 against California's Gov. Newsom's limits on in-home religious gatherings
Breaking 911 ^
Posted on 04/10/2021 2:26:47 PM PDT by janetjanet998
BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-4 against California's Gov. Newsom's limits on in-home religious gatherings; Chief Justice Roberts dissented along with the three liberal justices
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; church; gavinnewsom; newsom; roberts; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: ScubaDiver
that should be ‘Persuasive PRECDENT’ not persuasive opinions.
21
posted on
04/10/2021 2:59:05 PM PDT
by
ScubaDiver
(Reddit refugee.)
To: janetjanet998
> Chief Justice Roberts dissented along with the three liberal justices
In other words, the four liberal justices.
22
posted on
04/10/2021 3:01:36 PM PDT
by
ArcadeQuarters
(Socialism requires slavery.)
To: teevolt
That’s because of the stranglehold the MSM has on news in the world. THEY decide what we’re gonna hear about and how they’re going to color the story. Until something changes, we’re always gonna be on defense.
To: Gene Eric
A totalitarian tool. Sides are being chosen...
24
posted on
04/10/2021 3:07:18 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Lift the rim. You’re not that good a shot.)
To: janetjanet998
Roberts showing his pinko colors as usual...
25
posted on
04/10/2021 3:15:48 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another Samuel Adams now that we desperately need him?)
To: SuperLuminal
Roberts is seriously blackmailed. Every since ObamaCare.
26
posted on
04/10/2021 3:18:31 PM PDT
by
Revel
To: janetjanet998
What do you expect from a traitor who sold out the voters of this country?
27
posted on
04/10/2021 3:19:07 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: janetjanet998
28
posted on
04/10/2021 3:48:01 PM PDT
by
PGalt
(past peak civilization?)
To: taxcontrol
We most likely would have been better off with Harriet Meirs.
29
posted on
04/10/2021 3:52:57 PM PDT
by
americas.best.days...
( Donald John Trump has pulled the sword from the stone.)
To: Trump20162020
Roberts is just going full Souter now.More like full Ginsberg. The guy's really a leftist pig isn't he?
30
posted on
04/10/2021 3:55:46 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(CNN is what happens when 8th graders run a cable network.)
To: janetjanet998; All
31
posted on
04/10/2021 4:09:44 PM PDT
by
PGalt
(past peak civilization?)
To: mikelets456
All three of President Trumps nominees lead the fight !
Wooo Hoop.
No wonder the Dems want to pack the court.
32
posted on
04/10/2021 4:13:10 PM PDT
by
Pikachu_Dad
("the media are selling you a line of soap)
To: janetjanet998
That wonderful RC judge that illegally adopted children from ireland. ..that judge?
To: janetjanet998
BFD.
This is the amateur hour for nation’s so-called highest court.
Meanwhile, Rome is burning.
34
posted on
04/10/2021 4:20:30 PM PDT
by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: Revel
I would love to know what they have on him
To: Hostage
To: janetjanet998
Robert’s rules against a constitutional rights again! The dirty dog!
To: TakebackGOP
Chief inJustice John Robs US. He’s become quite despicable.
38
posted on
04/10/2021 4:30:30 PM PDT
by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny )
To: americas.best.days...
I don’t know why this is mistakenly repeated so often. Harriet Miers was nominated for the seat that was subsequently taken by Samuel Alito, not by John Roberts.
To: janetjanet998
What the heck? John Roberts went liberal on us?
This sounds like a rerun......
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson