Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Lindell Really Does Have Irrefutable Proof That The Election Was Stolen
LINDELLTV.COM ^

Posted on 04/03/2021 3:32:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

We have all been listening to Mike Lindell for the past few months about how he had irrefutable evidence of election fraud. Another BOOM is what I figured. We are all getting pretty tired of the hype. I wasn't going to bother watching it but my wife did and then we watched it together.

Maybe there is nothing we can do about it, maybe there is, but the fact is that he really does have irrefutable evidence of the election fraud. That's why not even George Soros' factcheck.org will touch it. They "debunked" the first one, but they are hoping that people who check don't realize that Mike has a second video.

Not many people have the time to watch an hour long video, so that will limit the audience.

That's why I am going to outline the most imporant parts so you can get the bullet points in a couple of minutes.

This is the real thing. The election was stolen, and it was stolen online in real time and if we don't do something about it our country is lost.


Dr. Douglas Frank holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry with over sixty scientific publications including a cover page article in Science magazine in 1990 and was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in Europe.

He determined that 2010 US Census data was used to inject phantom voters into the 2020 election rolls. He proved it by going house-to-house to 1600 houses to audit 2020 voters and determined that 32% of the "voters" did not live at that address. THIS WAS NATIONWIDE, IN ALL 50 STATES.


Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist

https://lindelltv.com/mike-lindell-tv-releases-irrefutable-election-theft-proof/


Every precinct/county in the country has a voter registration database.

In most states you can download the voter registration database for free but some states charge hefty fees.

The voter registration database shows all registered voters and their voting histories.

There were lots of (too many) voters who only voted once, in November 2020.

Hired people to go house-to-house to 1600 houses to audit 2020 voters and determined that 32% of the "voters" were "phantom" and did not live at that address.

Votes can be manufactured by having a computer algorithm that votes for registered voters who never show up to vote.

The only way to know for sure if a "voter" actually voted is to ask them.

The night of the election (and for several days before and after), White Hats were monitoring computer intrusions into the voting machine network and collecting times and MAC/IP addresses of the intruders.

You can graph the number of registered voters by age from the voter registration database.

The numbers of people who voted in each age bracket should always be substantially less (~80%) than the number of registered voters in that bracket.

Small discrepancies are disregarded by "experts"

90% or more is highly suspect.

Hamiltion County, Ohio had 95% of the population registered to vote with some ages having more voters than residents of that age.

The percent of votes cast (red curve) for each age group were exactly the same, mirroring the registered voter curve. This is almost impossible in even one county, but it happened in all 88 counties in Ohio, which could only be accomplished through a computer algorithm.

The same key was used for all 88 Ohio counties. The key is the algorithm that turns registrations into "voters." What this means is the same percentage of each age group voted in every county in Ohio.

This is the key that converted registrations to ballots in every county in Ohio. Dr. Frank took the average of fourteen Ohio counties to create the key that worked for all 88 Ohio counties. The curve is a 6th order polynomial, which makes it much easier to construct the key because only 6 numbers are required instead of 82 numbers for age 18 through 100. Along with the turnout number the algorithm can predict every county in Ohio. This allows the intruders to set up the alogorithm ahead of time.

The Stark County, Ohio voter curve shows two sharp shoulders at approximately 75 and 80 years of age. All 88 counties show this same pattern of 75 and 80 year old voters. This pattern holds up not only in Ohio, but in EVERY STATE tested so far. The gray curve is the predicted voter results from the algorithm, the red curve is the actual voter results. The correlation coefficient between the two is 1.0000, meaning it is a perfect fit.

This could only be accomplished with constant interaction between the voting machines and a supercomputer somewhere on the Internet. When Dr. Frank saw Mike Lindell's first video all the pieces fell together. Mike's group has all the evidence on the computers that were doing this, they just didn't know what those computers were doing. Dr. Frank's discovery fills in what they were doing.

The two-shoulder pattern in voting for 75 and 80 year olds shows up in Pennsylvania District O4 voting records.

The 2010 US Census data for Pennsylvania District 04 has those same two shoulders.

Q: What are the odds?

A: Zero.

2010 Population was used by the algorithm to determine phantom registrations

Graph: Registered Voters vs Population.

Bloomfield County Colorado; registrations greater than population because population decreased since 2010. More people voted than even lived there.

More people registered in 20 Colorado counties than live there because they used the 2010 US census in the algorithm and population decreased in those 20 counties.

Jackson County, Colorado; more phantom voters than live there because population decreased since 2010.

Knocked on doors and determined that 32% of voters did not live there.

Anybody can get their county's voter registration database and conduct their own audit of people who only voted in the 2020 Presidential election.

THIS IS THE BIGGEST CRIME IN HISTORY. WE MUST GET RID OF THE COMPUTERIZED VOTING MACHINES.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2020electionfraud; bidenvoters; demagogicparty; dsj03; electionfraud; electionfraud2020; electiontheft; fraud; mikelindell; steal; thesteal; trolls; trump; votefraud; voterfraud; weirdo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

You seem to be advocating murder.

Are you advocating murder?


181 posted on 04/04/2021 10:20:18 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Anti-racism looks suspiciously like racism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

182 posted on 04/04/2021 10:56:40 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

LOL to your last statement!


183 posted on 04/04/2021 11:06:28 AM PDT by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

You are correct that not all of them have a correlation of 1.000 that is my error, not theirs. They did not claim that all of the were that I am aware of.


184 posted on 04/04/2021 12:09:20 PM PDT by rlmorel ("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

I was referring to have a correlation in one county that approached +1.000 across all age groups


185 posted on 04/04/2021 12:11:33 PM PDT by rlmorel ("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
What kind of loser wouldn’t want election fraud to be exposed and prosecuted?

Who said any of that made-up bullshit?

Answer the question.

What does any of this "exposure" actually DO?

186 posted on 04/04/2021 1:00:22 PM PDT by humblegunner (Balls To Picasso.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Of course it was stolen...as have dozens of other local, state and federal elections the last 40 years.

The “image’ of the Left as an honest political wing in the USA has been driven by the media.

Since 1984 the control of media outlets has dropped from over 50 different organizations to just 6 today. The product of that consolidation is an ILLUSION of a “powerful Left wing”, a manufactured progressive consensus that has usurped political power it has no business with honestly. “honest” votes for Biden/the Left were 30-35 million. At most.

The problems originate in corrupted, local electoral precincts in deep Blue urban centers. These NEED to be cleaned. Nobody desires the dirty job. Part of “redistricting” projects, BTW, is to create regions and social environments permitting unfettered and unhindered electoral Fraud.

Think parts of cities where Republicans fear to tread. No bipartisan voting observers. If any Republican observers, or even voters show up,they are threatened. This is the beginning process of turning a Red state Purple.

This article provides a glimpse into exactly this process going on in Philadelphia in 2009

https://www.heritage.org/commentary/voter-intimidation-new-black-panther-style

There are more of “us” than “them” A whole lot more

Its all kayfabe. Its what they want you to believe, its what they want you to “feel”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kayfabe

What the left has done, ever since the 1984 Reagan-Mondale blowout - (and Mondale was a “moderate” Democrat!) - is to start electoral fraud programs in the largest states to turn them from Red-to-Purple-to Blue. They realized they had no future otherwise. It started in California and New York.

This last election cycle local Texans managed to turn it around at the precinct level-their RINO Governor not withstanding.

Extreme involvement in your local precincts and making sure paper balloting on ELECTION DAY, with hand counts and recounts in a transparent fashion and setting with open audit trails available to the general public, among other measures-are key.

Its dirty, tough work and initially confrontational with the existing perps. As the above article illustrates, it will be dangerous. But it beats the heck outta the alternatives -which are bearing down like a runaway freight train

The left has focused on corrupting our local electoral process. They focus on the deep urban centers. This process of corruption is very active presently in Georgia, using Atlanta as its base, the last 2 election cycles. This process is seditious.

We the People have no future otherwise. These people INTEND to “rule”

The benefits of this process created the UniParty which is WHY this has been allowed to mature.


187 posted on 04/04/2021 1:07:48 PM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

The bias is the ballot manufacturing that came after the election.

That bias.


188 posted on 04/04/2021 1:14:59 PM PDT by romanesq (TRUSTY THE PLAN! ChiCom Joe is the Plan? Que magnificent! 👹)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
The balllots that came after the election have a variety of sources, including stacks of "mail-in" ballots with no provenance. Most had no or very little signature matching (the courts either overruled signature matching, or certain jurisdictions allowed anything, with impossibly low rejection rates). Some "mail-in" ballots were not folded so never mailed. Many had no security envelopes in states where that was required.

Ballots were processed without adequate or in come cases any supervision in several states. That included creating new ballots from old ballots that (allegedly) could not be read. That all happened after the election. Hundreds of thousands of ballots were processed after the election overwhelmingly in favor of Biden. That was planned and planned to be cover for the fraud.

There's no need to dream up a biased algorithm, which according to your new theory, was only triggered after the election. The prior drivel from the MIT guy and the physics guy was that the algorithm bias took place during the election. Those were junk so now you nvented a new algorithm, one triggered after the polls close. Of course an algorithm could easily access and use the date. But the counting fraud has a simpler explanation.

The algorithm bias theory serves three simple purposes: make convervatives look stupid, distract from the actual fraud, and enrich voting machine companies in their lawsuits. How are we going to stop midnight ballot alterations? How are we going to securely mark ballots to stop fabrication? How are we going to stop harvesting, bribing, threats, signature forging, non-postmarked ballots, and worst of all, bureaucrats and judges illegally changing the rules?

In your world, we're not. We'll simply accuse the voting machine companies, without evidence, of biased counting and let all that other stuff continue. Because of course it had to be the algorithm.

189 posted on 04/04/2021 1:52:25 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: palmer

You don’t even know who you’re talking at.
That’s what you’re doing and it’s fallacious.

I never said Election Theft 2020 was based on any computer ballot theft.

SMH


190 posted on 04/04/2021 2:03:50 PM PDT by romanesq (TRUSTY THE PLAN! ChiCom Joe is the Plan? Que magnificent! 👹)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
I never said Election Theft 2020 was based on any computer ballot theft.

Great I'm glad we agree.

191 posted on 04/04/2021 2:21:46 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

What good does this do??
There is certainly reason for your skepticism, but my answer is that the American people have a right to know the truth and I sincerely believe that when a critical mass is achieved real change/reform will happen.


192 posted on 04/04/2021 2:50:08 PM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Hey TGurl!
This was the factor that Trump himself could not get his head around. I am not on the inside of any of this but what I expect them to answer is that Trump’s numbers were huge, the algorithm only needed to be enough. Was this the only problem you saw in it?


193 posted on 04/04/2021 2:55:32 PM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Follow up later.


194 posted on 04/04/2021 3:32:55 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

*


195 posted on 04/04/2021 3:46:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Anti-racism looks suspiciously like racism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

You are correct here. We have an additional data point that shows this as well.

Florida.

Florida typically is the swing States of all Swing States. However, since 2000, Florida has enacted very strict controls on their elections, including some of the best controls in the nation on mail-in ballots.

If the Democrats could have rigged Florida for Biden, AZ, WI, PA and GA wouldn’t have mattered.

If Trump won AZ, WI, PA and GA, but lost Florida, Biden would still have had 278 electoral votes.

Yet Florida wasn’t rigged. Why? Because of the stringent controls on the absentee and mail-in ballots.

In AZ, GA, WI and PA the controls were systematically destroyed. In GA it was by a consent decree. In Pennsylvania, it was done by the PA Supreme Court.

Morons keep chasing the machines when the data doesn’t support that line. The mail-in balloting is where the action is.


196 posted on 04/04/2021 3:49:32 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

*


197 posted on 04/04/2021 4:06:48 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Anti-racism looks suspiciously like racism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport; humblegunner

They don’t count because they’ve sold their souls.

I was talking about you and humptygummer.


198 posted on 04/04/2021 5:03:29 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

“What does any of this ‘exposure’ actually DO?”

What does anything actually do?

Why do you post on this website?

Why do you draw your next breath?

Why do you even bother to think?


199 posted on 04/04/2021 5:04:04 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

At least one of us is in good company.


200 posted on 04/04/2021 5:20:08 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson