She claims that Dominion conducted a "well-orchestrated public relations campaign to save their business" and that allegations against her are "sparse." Her legal team also requested that the case be moved from D.C. to Texas if it isn't tossed out.
The full motion is available at the link.
A plea of non compos mentis seems appropriate.
The Kracken was released. But rejected.
Related...
Ex-Trump lawyer Powell asks judge to toss voting machine company’s $1.3 billion lawsuit
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3944354/posts
No media bias there, nope.
“Powell argues in her motion that “no reasonable person” would conclude that her accusations of Dominion’s election-rigging scheme “were truly statements of fact.”
But thousands of Qtards did.
How does that happen?
Claims that Biden legitimately won the presidential election are completely baseless.
What is baseless is the claims Of Biden winning the election
If she’s gonna raise this “no reasonable person” defense, then she’s gonna have to account for the 20 or so appearances she made reiterating these assertions she made against Dominion. I was a supporter of Sydneys’ efforts but she got so far out in front of her skis and apparently, far out ahead of her evidence that she went full goofball. I regret that she’s gonna be in some serious hot water with this lawsuit. It will go far beyond bankrupting her even if she’s exonerated.
I don’t think it was the machines. The mail in ballots without any verification, counted over and over did it.
Again with the “baseless” thing thrown in every other sentence. If the claims are so “baseless,” why are you protesting so much? Can’t you just say Trump’s claims and leave it at that?
Goebbels’ rule about the “big lie” has more than a few flaws in it, most notably, that if you protest too much that something is a lie, you give it credibility. The more people call it “baseless,” “false” and “fake,” the more people want to examine it on the merits.
I was examining it on the merits the morning of November 4, and it seemed to me on its face then that there was some serious election fraud afoot, and Trump claiming the same was hardly a surprise. Biden stole an election and got away with it, so far. But nobody’s fooled.
It looks to me like she is arguing no reasonable person would conclude her accusations were ALREADY PROVEN FACT, but rather sincerely held beliefs based on what she knew at the time that would require proving via a court battle.
Not that her accusations were so ridiculous that no reasonable person COULD believe them. Just that they would not be accepted as factual unless proven in a future court case.
OMG she is basically saying the stuff coming out of her mouth was so insane that no one with a brain would believe it. So funny!! What a screwball she turned out to be. This is so tragic it’s hilarious.
Knowing how the media lie I read the filing.
Not a lawyer.
Lyn claims her statements should not be believed by a reasonable person because she was an avowed advocate.
[I certainly had that response when I saw them and started ignoring her early on as a liar].
Yet elsewhere she claims the protections of a journalist and a media outlet. in fact she claims every protection for her speech as can be made under any rubric. No idea how that will work out for her since I’m not a lawyer.
Anuyway, should be fun.