[Mr Rogers]

It looks to me like she is arguing no reasonable person would conclude her accusations were ALREADY PROVEN FACT, but rather sincerely held beliefs based on what she knew at the time that would require proving via a court battle.

Not that her accusations were so ridiculous that no reasonable person COULD believe them. Just that they would not be accepted as factual unless proven in a future court case.

[Rusty0604]

But if it went to court, wouldn’t that provide the opportunity to present 5he evidence?

[FreeReign]

It looks to me like she is arguing no reasonable person would conclude her accusations were ALREADY PROVEN FACT, but rather sincerely held beliefs based on what she knew at the time that would require proving via a court battle. Not that her accusations were so ridiculous that no reasonable person COULD believe them. Just that they would not be accepted as factual unless proven in a future court case.

Wow. It took thirty posts before somebody finally gets it right.

I'm guessing you actually read the motion to dismiss instead of relying on Axios or Rooters to give you Powell's full argument.