Posted on 02/15/2021 8:54:13 AM PST by Navy Patriot
President Trump’s attorney Michael van der Veen dispelled mainstream media’s false claims about his acquittal. He refuted an attempt by a CBS reporter to downplay the significance of Democrat impeachment managers selectively editing evidence for the Senate trial.
“The media has to start telling the right story in this country…the media is trying to divide this country,” stated the attorney. “You are bloodthirsty for ratings!”
Van der Veen noted, Democrats committed massive wrongdoing during the sham impeachment and mainstream media is covering that up.
(Excerpt) Read more at oann.com ...
Yeah. When you have the platform call these monsters who they are.COMMIES.
The CBS presstitute indicted the entire Media when she felt the need to explain the Doctored and Fraudulent Evidence submitted by the Demonrats, The Medis NEVER REPORTED IT!!!
it recurs because there is never accountability.
no accountability FOR THEM.
if YOU did it, you would hang.
Sadly, this is one of those things that can’t be fixed the “easy way”. It will come to blows eventually. It may be a month. It may be a year. It may be four or five years, but the only way this gets resolved will almost certainly be violence - preceded by an attempt to remove the citizens’ rights in free countries as in Venezuela.
I wish the lawyer had played this just a bit differently and simply hammered on the point of the doctored evidence instead of making the media the object of his anger. After watching the clip a couple of times it's clear to me that he misunderstood what she was saying. Because of the delay in the audio feed they were talking over each other several times, and he misquoted her when he starting ranting about one of her comments.
Having said that, I think it was an awesome rant that reflects the utter contempt so many Americans have for the media.
If they can use doctored evidence against President Trump, they can use it against any of us.
Communism fits into it too wonder if CNN will change logo to CCP.
A fact that curiously goes unreported in Pravda...er...the media.
Why do you suppose the FBI refuses to tape their interviews and only uses after-the-fact summaries put together by their agents? Because for years and years they’ve been manufacturing evidence. Sorry, I used to respect and trust them but no more.
She seemed unprepared to handle the answer to the question she read. Maybe someone in her office wrote the question for her.
When we have a media that excuses doctoring evidence as a little blue check, date written incorrectly, comments selectively edited out of context as not a big deal, there is no way we will ever have good government again. Lana Zak is so sleazy a propagandist!
This must end! Whatever it takes.
The corrupt media is clickbait news.
There was a Kirk Douglas movie from 1951 called “Ace in the Hole” about a newspaper reporter (douglas) covering a mine cave in and discovered a trapped miner. He milked the story. Happy ending with the reporter dropping dead at the end.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ace_in_the_Hole_(1951_film)
Then there is this in a search on Yellow Journalism:
Yellow Journalism Examples. ... Spanish American War - Yellow journalism helped to push Spain and the United States into war in 1898. The Maine, a U.S. battleship, sank from an explosion. Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst published false articles about a plot to sink the ship, thereby increasing tensions.
Agree on both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.