Fight against Ivermectin has begun

Dozens of studies and several meta-studies have already found low-cost ivermectin to be highly effective against covid. In January, even the US NIH had to change its stance from ‘negative’ to ‘neutral’. Detractors of ivermectin had to act, but they knew that this time, it wouldn’t be easy.

In their fight against low-cost HCQ – which was also found to be effective in the early treatment of high-risk patients, thanks to its anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic properties – detractors published a made-up study in the Lancet (the Surgisphere scandal) and ran trials with toxic overdoses in ICU patients (the ‘SOLIDARITY’ and ‘RECOVERY’ trials). But Ivermectin is very difficult to overdose, and unlike HCQ, it works as a prophylaxis against infection and even in ICU patients.

Thus, it would be much more difficult to design a deceptive study against ivermectin.

Finally, a ‘solution’ was found: US pharmaceutical company Merck – one of the manufacturers of patent-free Ivermectin – has just published a statement simply claiming, without evidence, that their (unpublished) “analysis” had identified “no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies; no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease; and a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.”

An NIH operative quickly retweeted the Merck statement, adding: “Merck’s statement on ivermectin is the leadership and commitment to quality translational science that we need to see from pharma/biotech.” In reality, Merck’s claim is completely baseless and also ironic: after having safely sold ivermectin for several decades, Merck now suddenly questions its safety.

Interestingly, Merck recently signed a $356 million deal to supply the US with a much more expensive, newly developed experimental anti-covid drug. Meanwhile, Youtube removed a C-SPAN video of FLCCC President Dr Pierre Kory’s US Senate testimony on ivermectin.

The reality is this: a low-cost and highly effective drug against covid, like Ivermectin, would disrupt not only the multi-billion dollar global vaccine campaign (which does indeed lack long-term safety and efficacy data), but also follow-up ‘lock step’ policies like vaccine passports, smartphone-based global contact monitoring, as well as programs like ID2020 and ‘Known Traveler’ promoted by vaccine investor Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum, and similar groups.

Like they did with HCQ, lots of Pharma money, "One World Government," China, and Control Freaks together are trying to stop Ivermectin from being used for Covid-19. The CDC is inept and corrupt and can't be trusted at all on Covid. Same with china bot WHO.

In India, they are handing out Ivermectin pills at public kiosks, and India has only 9% of the death rate as the US.

If we had a functional DOJ, lots of people would be in jail. But Obama corrupted the entire agency, including the FIB, on purpose. They no longer are on our side.

So get your own, and tell your families. I've been on HCQ, C1500, D3 5000, and Zinc 50 since April. Just started Ivermectin horse paste a month ago. And no mask, period. No covid yet.

I'll post a link where to get Ivermectin later.

I appreciate the genuine hope that there is an easy efficacious treatment against Covid. But there are some inaccuracies in this from the medical standpoint that need to be covered

1. Ivermectin shows some use in treatment of Covid. I have a prescribed. I have also had pharmacies refuse to fill. What is important is that it is not perfect. Many people with CoVId and Comorbidities advance to severe disease and die despite timely ivermectin

2. If you have symptoms and positive test and are over 65 or have comorbidities there is a targeted treatment with nearly miraculous results. Monoclonal antibodies. Bamlanivomab OR regeneron. This is the treatment given to PDJT. These infusions stop progression and actually turn people around in 24 hours. It is currently free in the United States and there is much supply as people don’t know about it and primary care physicians seem overwhelmed and don’t know how to get people to infusion center for it. There is a list of centers in each state and I have personally seen this work miracles.

3. Ivermectin does not act as a pure prophylaxis. While I agree with the data that there si decreased disease it is NOT as efficacious as vaccination. Vaccines stop the disease and in time we will find our drop the transmission. Currently the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 95% and 94% effective at preventing the disease and 100% effective at preventing severe disease. They are also effective against the variants. There is simply no current understanding of how long and how often to give ivermectin as prophylaxis and where used it is not showing causing critical illness to be absent

4. For those who do not wish to be vaccinated to who wish to use this treatment instead after full information they it simply is not as good as other preventions and treatments the dose is for symptomatic disease 12 mg a day for five days. Horse paste and online orders are not verified as actual ivermectin or quality controlled. I would not get anything online out of country as scams abound.

Ivermectin is a partial treatment with some ability to stop progression of disease but it is an imperfect and not targeted treatment. We have much better preventions and treatments.

Finally we are approximately 14. Months into the pandemic. I am watching world wide trends including England and South Africa. There appears to be significantly falls in the numbers ongoing which would be correct for the 18-24 month timeline for pandemic. I do think this will end hopefully by Christmas naturally and coukd end as soon as mid summer with vaccination. I think we are probably close to herd immunity especially with a good vaccination strategy.

Please note I have given just the medical facts in this statement and hope to not be attacked politically or with irrational exuberance of conspiracy theorists. I am happy to answer questions on point to the medicine. But I kindly ask the ad hominem attacks are left out. (Obviously basket this is not aimed at you).

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.