Posted on 02/07/2021 3:47:00 AM PST by true believer forever
Bkmk
If your point is it is a grind to get through, I’d agree with that. I only made it to about 35 minutes in.
But today I’ll cue up the last 15 minutes or so thanks to your suggestion.
To a retired computer geek like myself, the last 15 minutes hurts more than it helps. It may look impressive to the average Joe, but I know I could shoot many holes of doubt in it. I thought the testimony of the first three technical experts was REAL impressive. And, they said they had documentation and witnesses!
You really are on the other side of the fence :) If you have the energy and time I would appreciate hearing your opinions, as I was left wanting more documentation and evidence, also. I think I will also take another look at those first three tech experts you talk about. I just thought Lindell was a very distracting presence.
The only place this story will get any traction is conservative media. Nothing will change.
But you must.
If he's actually smart about it he will benefit from reasonable criticism from his ideologic friends. As it is, I believe this video will impress only weak minds if it impresses them at all.
He also needs to understand that brevity is the soul of wit which you seem to understand by trying to capture what you feel was the kernel of his presentation. Before your post here I had only watched the first ten minutes or so of the full presentation before I gave up on it.
ML/NJ
But you must.
If he's actually smart about it he will benefit from reasonable criticism from his ideologic friends. As it is, I believe this video will impress only weak minds if it impresses them at all.
He also needs to understand that brevity is the soul of wit which you seem to understand by trying to capture what you feel was the kernel of his presentation. Before your post here I had only watched the first ten minutes or so of the full presentation before I gave up on it.
ML/NJ
Of course you are right. I actually fell asleep, which I guess is a commentary in itself. He basically needs a surgical editor, astute interviewer, and lots of peerless documentation. Maybe someone with the right expertise will step up to help him.
Mike at least has stepped up to counter the fraud using the best of his talents, resources, and abilities. He is receiving tremendous flack and threats for doing so.
In early January/late December he even visited the President and urged him to do something.
Socialist/communist states are very hard to undo once rooted. The longer this goes on the greater the cost for its undoing.
I fault Trump for not taking action based on Flynn’s advice in December, and for believing the advice of this inner team of lawyers and advisors, who either wanted him to concede or believed they could undo this situation before inauguration.
No court will touch it; they’ve been warned by the Deep State Swamp.
You very speak truth.
The first 3 or 4 witnesses were talking language that I fully understand and sounded very credible. And, they said they had the data on the actual streams. That would be slam-dunk proof.
The last show-and-tell looked impressive, but it only depicted the connections and not what data was actually transmitted or received. Millions of connections a day happen between worldwide WANs. Some are accepted. Some are denied. Some make it past the first access point only to be blocked by a firewall or denied by an internal router somewhere. And, some never transmit or receive any usable data at all. The transmitted requests or handshake packets to/from those office locations mean very little. What you really want to show is that the voting data itself was actually transmitted or received. By what they said, I think the first witnesses could actually show this.
Bookmarking.
WOW!
The last show-and-tell looked impressive, but it only depicted the connections and not what data was actually transmitted or received. Millions of connections a day happen between worldwide WANs. Some are accepted. Some are denied. Some make it past the first access point only to be blocked by a firewall or denied by an internal router somewhere. And, some never transmit or receive any usable data at all. The transmitted requests or handshake packets to/from those office locations mean very little. What you really want to show is that the voting data itself was actually transmitted or received. By what they said, I think the first witnesses could actually show this.
Okay, I am going to run with this and see if I can track any verifiables down. If you have any more thoughts, and wouldn't mind, please let me know. I would appreciate it.
I'm out in the sticks, so the only internet I have is via a cellular router. For a cellular connection at 4G 15-20 MB/sec, it's pretty fast. But, I use a commercial equipment on my LAN so I can see everything that is happening. I constantly get hundreds of ping and connection requests from out of the country. But, my internal router lets me define firewall and defense parameters, and I've never been hacked.
YIKES !!!!!!!!!
Don’t hold your breath there is NO JUSTICE in politics NONE unless of course you support Trump!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.