The first 3 or 4 witnesses were talking language that I fully understand and sounded very credible. And, they said they had the data on the actual streams. That would be slam-dunk proof.
The last show-and-tell looked impressive, but it only depicted the connections and not what data was actually transmitted or received. Millions of connections a day happen between worldwide WANs. Some are accepted. Some are denied. Some make it past the first access point only to be blocked by a firewall or denied by an internal router somewhere. And, some never transmit or receive any usable data at all. The transmitted requests or handshake packets to/from those office locations mean very little. What you really want to show is that the voting data itself was actually transmitted or received. By what they said, I think the first witnesses could actually show this.
The last show-and-tell looked impressive, but it only depicted the connections and not what data was actually transmitted or received. Millions of connections a day happen between worldwide WANs. Some are accepted. Some are denied. Some make it past the first access point only to be blocked by a firewall or denied by an internal router somewhere. And, some never transmit or receive any usable data at all. The transmitted requests or handshake packets to/from those office locations mean very little. What you really want to show is that the voting data itself was actually transmitted or received. By what they said, I think the first witnesses could actually show this.
Okay, I am going to run with this and see if I can track any verifiables down. If you have any more thoughts, and wouldn't mind, please let me know. I would appreciate it.