Posted on 02/05/2021 5:10:58 AM PST by ConservativeStLouisGuy
Of late, I’ve felt more and more like I am back in Communist China. A place where every day, no matter what channel you turn on, what radio broadcast you listen to, or what online news service you subscribe to (except LifeSiteNews and a couple of others), the same dreary party line spews out.
The oligarchy is so confident that they can manipulate our very thoughts – after all, they control the search engines, the Twitter feeds, and the trending news – that they no longer even bother to hide what they do.
Deleting President Trump’s account made it clear to the world what devious little Jack Dorsey spends his days doing: maniacally deleting accounts that deviate from his “truths.”
And who doesn’t know by now that Mark Zuckerberg specializes in devising algorithms that are the hi-tech version of the mushroom treatment – keeping us in the dark and feeding us horse manure. The party line with regard to the 2020 presidential election, aggressively promoted by America’s corporate media and Big Tech, is this: There was no election fraud because the courts have said so.
Both claims are false. Not just questionable, but dead wrong.
By now, most people know that America’s corporate media and Big Tech have aggressively and punitively suppressed an open discussion of possible election irregularities.
But have you noticed that – to prop up their version of reality – they’ve simply stopped reporting on the dozens of ongoing lawsuits that are slowly wending their way through the court system?
At most, they will simply make a blanket statement along the lines of “Trump has lost all the lawsuits that have come before the courts.” Sometimes they will go further, and suggest that our justice system has thoroughly and impartially examined the claims of election fraud made in those suits, and have ruled that they are completely unfounded.
Nothing could be further from the truth, as Physicist John Droz has discovered. Droz assembled a team of his fellow scientists and engineers – all volunteers – to take a close look at the lawsuits that have been filed, all of which are a matter of public record, and to summarize the results.
This is no easy task, since there have been 80 lawsuits filed in connection with the 2020 presidential election by Trump or on his behalf, and each of these lawsuits consists of dozens of pages of filing and decisions.
The summary report, called “2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits Related to Election Integrity,” strips the excess verbiage of which lawyers are so fond, leaving the bare essentials of the lawsuits: What issues were at stake, how each case was treated by the courts, what evidence was objectively analyzed and, finally and most importantly, who won and who lost.
So what did Droz and his team find?
Trump is winning election lawsuits, in case you haven’t heard
First, of the 80 total lawsuits, 34 have either been withdrawn, consolidated with other suits, or dismissed due to legal technicalities such as lack of standing, timing, or jurisdiction. Those judges who dismissed suits never heard the actual evidence of election irregularities and/or fraud, since they did not allow it to be presented in their courtrooms. Such cases cannot be counted as a loss for Trump. If anything, they are evidence of a failure of our judicial system to – at a moment of national crisis – actually address election fraud.
Of the 46 remaining lawsuits, 25 cases are still ongoing, so that the winner and loser of these cases is yet to be determined, while 21 have been completely adjudicated. These are cases where the court heard arguments, considered any relevant evidence, and then issued a formal ruling on the merits.
You may be surprised to learn that, of these 21 cases, Trump has won 14 and lost 7.
In other words, Trump has won two-thirds of the cases to date that have been adjudicated by the courts.
Don’t expect to hear this on the evening news. John Droz notes separately that, despite the widespread allegations of massive voter fraud: “… only three (3) of these lawsuits materially dealt with voter illegalities (citizens voting twice, votes from deceased persons, etc.). Interestingly, all three of these cases are still open.”
“Further, just three (3) lawsuits addressed voting machine inaccuracies (purposeful or accidental). One of these was dismissed (due to jurisdiction), one was ruled against (although no discovery was granted), and one is still open (discovery was granted).”
“The likely explanation for so few cases in these two areas is that legally proving fraud or voting machine manipulations are very time-consuming processes, that require substantial investigative work and documentation. There simply wasn’t enough time to do this prior to key points in the process (like the Electoral College).”
Kudos to John Droz and his team for helping to educate the public about the ongoing legal efforts in ensure election integrity.
I think everyone understands that, if we can be defrauded of our vote, we no longer live in a democracy.
If a tree falls in the forest....
But hey, we just have to listen to CatOwner and his troll friends about how this was all a losing proposition.
Who’s “Catowner”?
Mark for reference.
^ 45 ^
He lost because how lawyers couldn’t bring the evidence. And yeah-they never brought fraud evidence. Let that sink in and stop making excuses for it (like the article tries to do).
It's probably Karen's sister.
It’s not about winning court cases....it’s about draining Trumps wealth.
It’s not about winning court cases....it’s about draining Trumps wealth.
It doesn’t matter. It makes no difference how these lawsuits turn. The Biden/Pelosi/Schumer insurrection is complete with no action or remedies ordered by the courts.
> But hey, we just have to listen to CatOwner and his troll friends about how this was all a losing proposition. <
In the interest of keeping things balanced, it’s way too early to say this is not a losing proposition. A plaintive can win lawsuit after lawsuit. But if nothing changes, then those wins are just moral victories. And moral victories don’t pay the rent.
For example, suppose some judge somewhere rules that Dominion voting machines are inherently flawed. What will that matter if those machines are used again in 2022 and 2024?
I wish I could be more optimistic about this. But so much of the judiciary has shown themselves to be either Deep Staters or Deep State sympathizers. This is going to be a long, uphill battle.
Side note: Ottawa, please understand that a person can disagree with your point of view without being a troll, a communist, etc.
You are right. This story is deceptive. Almost all of the Trump “wins” are pre-election wins and have nothing to do with the election fraud that we are concerned with today.
Yeah. The article blows thru many paragraphs before even addressing the title subject, then claims dismissed/withdrawn cases don’t count (”this is stupid, get it out of my court” is a loss), claims adjudicated-but-appealed cases aren’t resolved (they are unless actually reversed), doesn’t differentiate between Trump’s own cases vs others on his behalf, then gets further squishy about what actually counts as a win.
I really have no idea how many serious cases Trump filed (vs frivolity by others), nor their outcome. Articles like this just muddy the issue further.
Bottom line: Joe is in the Oval Office, not Donald.
The inability of Trump’s “elite legal strikeforce” to present hard evidence of vote fraud is simply mind boggling, because it was everywhere and publicly available.
For instance..
- Video segments from major news networks (ABC, CNN, etc) showing Trump’s real-time vote count for different battleground states going DOWN, and Joe’s going up compared to the last update - by precisely the SAME NUMBER of votes. eg: Trump lost 5,278 votes over the prior update..and Joe gained 5,278 votes over the prior update..at the exact same time. Impossible, and pretty compelling evidence of vote count shenanigans (likely the machine algorithms at work, as has been widely speculated upon).
- Video of containers of ballots coming out from under the tables at the TCF Center, and being run through the counting machines multiple times in the dead of night, after all R poll watchers were sent home. (As most know, the R poll watchers were told counting was “done” for the night, yet it continued after they were told to leave). The “debunking experts” claim this is false, but the videos are (or were) publicly available and show clearly that it is factual.
- Voter rolls from AZ and elsewhere that conclusively show, beyond all doubt, that there are “anomalies” in who actually voted - in AZ’s case, beyond Joe’s margin of supposed victory. Those “anomoalies” include people who no longer live in AZ, dead people, people who voted more than 1 time, etc. A comprehensive list of these anomalies was presented and logged into the Congressional record during the start of the vote certification by an (R) Congressman and is irrefutable.
Why our “elite” legal team (and I say that with dripping sarcasm, as I personally think they were the worst possible legal team Trump could have chose) could not competently present ANY of that in a convincing way is beyond my ability to comprehend. IMHO, that’s a large part of why Trump “lost” the election. Had we had halfway decent legal experts running things, the outcome likely would have been quite different. (I get all the reasons Trump chose the people he did..but it doesn’t change whether or not they did a good job - they didn’t, in my strong opinion).
Good short analysis and advice about confirmation bias.
At the end of the day, despite the number of different states involved, there was amazingly no due process to challenge election fraud and state election law / constitutional violations, in real time. The other amazing thing was that our activist judiciary did not want to be activists. In a way, this all could have been predicted for Trump. He was warned in the debate and media that he will accept the results if he loses.
In the meantime, there is a Congressional seat in upstate NY that is still unseated as it works it way through the judicial system. All efforts seem to be made by judiciary to find a way to let the demonkkkrap win. Now that is due process!
>> who’s “CatOwner”
“Of the ones that are “TBD”-no-they are losses. They are appeals to the SCOTUS where they will also be losses. This is bunk.”
Hum. You may be correct, but it is still a bit of “prejudice” on your part to proclaim that has not happened will happen. (That is “downer” propaganda.)
Interesting. You joined on November 22, the anniversary of Kennedy’s assassination. (Always a depressing anniversary.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.