Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Destruction of Grammar and Logic Got Biden into the Oval Office
American Thinker ^ | Robert Oscar Lopez

Posted on 01/27/2021 4:55:57 AM PST by RoosterRedux

Many people snickered at the claim made in Texas v. Pennsylvania that there is only a one in a quadrillion chance that Joe Biden won all the swing states as currently claimed. The true meaning beneath the statistic is simple: the vote counts certified in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia are fake, so let's cut through all the noise and decide what to do next. "One in a quadrillion" is a rarified way of saying it just didn't happen.

Texas's case was shot down because in the United States both grammar and logic have been overtaken by rhetoric.

The old trio: Grammar, logic, and rhetoric

Rhetoric is not the same thing as logic or grammar. Philosopher Richard Weaver championed rhetoric as a tool to share truth rather than skirt it. But ever since the ancient birth of "sophistry," there have been rhetoricians who see logic and grammar as disposable tools to support a primary rhetorical agenda. (Some call this, basically, propaganda.)

When people ask you, "how can 95% of doctors be wrong?" or "how can all the courts be wrong?," you should keep in mind that the overemphasis on rhetoric has been universal in colleges since the 1980s, even in Christian and conservative colleges. Professional degrees in medicine and law followed undergraduate degrees in which rhetoric, rather than literature, was used to teach people writing. This was the fruit of the endless battles over "general education" requirements.

Consider some stupid ideas that have attained a consensus in the worlds of medicine and law.

The same medical community that concluded that racial justice rallies were not dangerous during a COVID pandemic but patriotic rallies were also concluded that there is no purpose to indicating on birth certificates whether someone is male or female.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: covid; covid19; debate; electionfraud; grammar; judges; logic; rhetoric; scotus; sophistry; trivium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: DownInFlames

Pen disaster?


21 posted on 01/27/2021 5:52:51 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Trump: "They're After You. I'm Just In The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Agree. Very good article. Thanks to the poster. I think we have lost the reasonable person standard in law. The author Lopez breaks it down very well. The evidence of election fraud is all over the place, many people simply refuse to look at it logically. As Bannon says this is a wound that will not heal.


22 posted on 01/27/2021 5:56:54 AM PST by freefdny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

NEA and the MSM did their job on America


23 posted on 01/27/2021 5:56:57 AM PST by SMARTY (“If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law.” Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
This is a good article, and yes, it certainly will get at least a second reading from me so I can fully digest it.

I've been reading a lot of Orwell's essays lately regarding the use (and abuse) of linguistics, and the critical nature of language in the formation and transmission of thought. This article is a very good extension of those writings.

24 posted on 01/27/2021 6:09:31 AM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

It’s a really good article explaining the judicial decisions not to look into obvious fraud.

Training kids to be illogical has been going on many years. I remember reading about it and trying an experiment with my Sunday school students. It was a simple If-Then statement. The kids were 12 years old but it baffled them.


25 posted on 01/27/2021 6:19:57 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baldwin77
YEP!!! Any discussion of the 2020 presidential election that does not begin ans end with MASSIVE1,000,000 voter fraud is pointless!
26 posted on 01/27/2021 6:34:19 AM PST by caprock (from the flats of SE New Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caprock

ans = and (oops)


27 posted on 01/27/2021 6:34:50 AM PST by caprock (from the flats of SE New Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

Thank you. I, too, noted that plugs is Jeff Dunham’s “Walter.” Walter is more intelligent.


28 posted on 01/27/2021 6:37:34 AM PST by caprock (from the flats of SE New Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The Leftist DemocRAT/Media complex dismisses any accusation of a stolen election as being “without evidence” while they actively suppress the substantial evidence that is already available. When roughly half the people in the country doubt that the election was stolen you would think that at least a thorough investigation should be conducted.


29 posted on 01/27/2021 6:46:47 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
The rank and file Democrats (and Republicans) are following the "company line" by suppressing evidence that the election was stolen.

November 6th was coup by the Ruling Elite which consists of big business, big tech, big media, big education, big government, big military, etc.

The Ruling Elite establish the "company line" and there is great comfort from following it if your livelihood is derived from them (the Ruling Elite).

Furthermore, those who support the Ruling Elite have been thoroughly brainwashed...so they have lost the will and ability to think for themselves.

30 posted on 01/27/2021 7:01:25 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Dominion voting machines got Slow Joe into office.


31 posted on 01/27/2021 7:06:30 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Don't forget Stacey Abrams and her ilk.

And the zombies who came back from the grave just to vote for Joe and Heels Up.

32 posted on 01/27/2021 7:10:31 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

How utterly ridiculous ... by not making a stink and going after cheaters in the elections of the past, the precedent was established that seditious acts of cancelling valid voters is acceptable. We the people have now gotten the inevitable results of our tolerating evil. Lawlessness is the norm now. This diversion to look at ‘rhetoric and logic’ is asinine hopium twisted to feed the foolish..


33 posted on 01/27/2021 7:16:50 AM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
On it's its face, your statement is, of course, accurate.

In a thread belonging to an article titled "How the Destruction of Grammar and Logic Got Biden into the Oval Office," I hope that this little correction will be taken in the spirit in which it was given.

Regards,

34 posted on 01/27/2021 7:26:14 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I've been reading a lot of Orwell's essays lately regarding the use (and abuse) of linguistics [...]

I don't believe that Orwell had a "bone to pick" with the field of study of Linguistics, as such.

Regards,

35 posted on 01/27/2021 7:28:39 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
"I don't believe that Orwell had a "bone to pick" with the field of study of Linguistics, as such."

To the contrary, he believed there were those who studied the social and psychological implications of language with the express intent of effectively manipulating them.

36 posted on 01/27/2021 7:35:31 AM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Thx.


37 posted on 01/27/2021 7:49:36 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Problem with this article is that it ironically forgets logic. The one in a quadrillion claim is only true if all events are independent. If there is a correlation between them, then the computation of odds go out the window.


38 posted on 01/27/2021 7:53:43 AM PST by CraigEsq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

However, logic, grammar and rhetoric are racist constructions of white privilege (sarcasm)


39 posted on 01/27/2021 8:37:56 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

If it is intended as satire to demonstrate the use of rhetoric as pointed out in the article, it is clever.
.....................................
Hell of catch! Kudos to you!


40 posted on 01/27/2021 3:14:37 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Conceding the result of a fraudulent election is both irrational and immoral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson