Posted on 01/04/2021 12:54:06 PM PST by SeekAndFind
A variant of the coronavirus identified in South Africa is more problematic than the mutation found in the U.K., Britain’s health minister said Monday, as both strains spread rapidly.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock told the BBC the variant found in South Africa was especially concerning.
“I’m incredibly worried about the South African variant, and that’s why we took the action that we did to restrict all flights from South Africa,” he told the BBC’s “Today” program.
“This is a very, very significant problem ... and it’s even more of a problem than the U.K. new variant.”
Both countries are struggling with a surge in Covid-19 infections, which have been attributed in large part to mutations in the virus that make it more transmissible.
The U.K.’s new variant was first identified in Kent, southeast England, in December. The U.K. authorities alerted the World Health Organization to its emergence.
Experts note that while the new variant spreads more easily, it does not appear to make it deadlier. Nonetheless, the U.K.’s hospitals are under pressure from a dramatic rise in infections and admissions.
Questions have been raised over how the coronavirus vaccines will work against the new variants.
Several experts have said they expect vaccines — such as those from Pfizer and BioNTech, and the Oxford University/AstraZeneca — to protect against the new strains.
Earlier in December, the WHO’s Chief Scientist Soumya Swaminathan tried to allay fears over the variants, telling the BBC that it was “very unlikely” that the latest mutations would cause the current vaccines not to work. The WHO has said further investigations are required “to understand the impact of specific mutations on viral properties and the effectiveness of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
“They both have multiple, different mutations in them, so they’re not a single mutation,” he told Times Radio. “And the mutations associated with the South African form are really pretty substantial changes in the structure of the (virus’ spike) protein.”
He said there were questions as to whether the Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccines would be “disabled” in the presence of such mutations.
A great big YAAAWN!!
Oh no, we’re all gonna die!
When will we have to start worrying about the strain from China? The original strain that came from Italy is bad enough.
Could be the end of the world as we know it.
Or not.
ML/NJ
Yep. YAAAWWWNNN!
These supposed experts and medical professionals are full of sh!t. I don’t believe a damn thing that comes out of their mouths. I like to tar and feather each and everyone of them and that midget Fauci is on the top of the list.
saw a south park meme- a character was lying on the ground, worried look on face “We’re doomed, only 99.9% of us are gonna make it through”
>>I look at the coronavirus hysteria/fear porn as merely a political tool, cooked up by the Dems/Biden campaign/media/big tech to steal the elections from President Trump using massive changes in election laws and mail in ballot laws in order to facilitate the greatest robbery in history, the stealing of the presidency of the United States.
And somehow they managed to convince almost every other country on the planet to go along with this?
“This is a very, very significant problem ... and it’s even more of a problem than the U.K. new variant.”
Why? If it’s not any more deadly and just spreads faster like the new UK strain why is it a more significant problem?
Hmmm?
Trying to out-victim each other, eh?
If true, seeding becomes the issue.
China is up and running, and we’re into our third wave and
the variants are jumping out.
I have suspected seeding, and I think it’s something we
should look into.
>>Why? If it’s not any more deadly and just spreads faster like the new UK strain why is it a more significant problem?
Whats more dangerous? a fires that spreads rapidly or a fire that spreads slowly? with a slow moving fire the FD can concentrate all their efforts on putting it out in one location, with a fast spreading fire the resources must be spread out everywhere at the same time, and there are often not enough resources to fight efficiently everywhere - so certain areas are sacrificed, and others are saved.
Thats why a faster spread is worse - a certain % of people are going to get very, very sick - and some will even die - you don’t want that happening all at once all over the place if you can avoid it.
I keep seeing reports Africa banned Ivermectin but dont know if true
Kay Granger from Texas tested positive. She was on house floor Sunday
btw, she had the vaccine...so we will see if she spread the virus
Wow, so I guess his people cant be treated for parasites with a drug that works because he doesnt even want to try it on people with Covid
“If true, seeding becomes the issue.”
I have thought this all along. Why are Asian countries nearly immune? Is there a gentic turn off switch? Why is Japan with the oldest population on the planet only have 3000 deaths in a country of 170 million? European countries with 1/2 that population had 50-70k deaths with equivelant lockdown measures.
The question becomes if this is true why are Western gov’t or scientist not bringing it up?? Are they afraid of breaking up the New World Globalist Order so 5-10 million whites in the long term can be sacrificed for the greater good?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.