Posted on 12/28/2020 9:00:19 AM PST by RideForever
CDMedia has begun to release information from a well-placed White House source on foreign interference in the Nov 3rd U.S. general election.
The first release regarded the Nevada Secretory of State sending voter information to Pakistani intelligence services. Learn more about RevenueStripe...
The second release is below, which show Dominion sent ballots for adjudication to 4 countries on election night – primarily Frankfurt, Germany.
———————————————
The Dominion Voting system is owned and controlled by foreign entities. We lose control of the data when it goes to a foreign country.
o The electronic information went to Germany, Barcelona, Serbia, and Canada
o Dominion Servers are in Belgrade Serbia. P 82.117.198.54 (ASN Range:82.117.192.0/19) Learn more about RevenueStripe...
o Dominion Servers ftp.dominionvoting.com with IP 69.172.237.100 (ASN Range:69.172.236.0/22) is located in Toronto, Canada
o www.scytl.com with IP 52.57.209.147 (ASN Range: 52.57.0.0/16) is located inFrankfurt Germany
o Support.scytl.com with IP 213.27.248.118 (ASN Range: 213.27.128.0/17) is located inBarcelona, Spain
o Scytl-com.mail.protection.outlook.com with IP 104.47.10.36 (ASN Range:104.40.0.0/13) is located in Ireland
o On election night the DE-CIX Frankfurt reached a 30% spike.
Dominion Voting Systems and related companies are owned or heavily controlled and influenced by foreign agents, countries, and interests. The forensic report prepared by experts found that “the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors…The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.” The report found the election management system to be wrought with unacceptable and unlawful vulnerabilities—including access to the internet— probable cause to find evidence of fraud, and numerous malicious actions. There is also probable cause to find that Dominion Voting Systems, Smartmatic, Electronic Systems & Software, and Hart Inter Civic, Clarity Election Night Reporting, Edison Research, Sequoia, Scytl, and similar or related entities, agents or assigns, have the same flaws and were subject to foreign interference in the 2020 election in the United States. There is probable cause to find these systems bear the same crucial code “features” and defects that allowed the same outside and foreign interference in our election, in which there is probable cause to find votes were in fact altered and manipulated contrary to the will of the voters. Dominion Voting Systems is based in Toronto, Canada, and assigns its intellectual property including patents on its firmware and software to Hong Kong and Shanghai
Multiple expert witnesses and cyber experts identified acts of foreign interference in the election prior to November 3, 2020 and continued in the following weeks. In fact, there is probable cause to find a massive cyber-attack by foreign interests on our crucial national infrastructure surrounding our election—not the least of which was the hacking of the voter registration system by Iran. (E.O. 13800 of May 11, 2017) Dominion and Smartmatic share a physical address in Barbados despite their insistence that there is no relationship between the companies. They also have a mutual non- compete agreement. Hootan Yaghoobzadeh is the CEO and Chairman of Staple Street Capital, which is the entity that owns Dominion. Hootan Yaghoobzadeh was a close confidant to Sadaam Hussein and worked for the Saudi Bin Laden group. Kavtech is a Pakistan based Business Intelligence firm with ties to the Pakistani intelligence ISI. The Co-Founder Waqas Butt is cc’d on emails containing personally identifiable voter information from the Nevada Secretary of State. The lead data scientist named Bilal Khan Nawabzada tweets directly to ISI.
The post Foreign Election Interference #2: Dominion Sent Information Election Night To 5 Countries, Frankfurt Saw 30% Spike Election Night appeared first on CD Media.
Provide evidence that anything you just said is true. What a load of crap.
14 posted on 12/28/2020, 11:32:03 AM by dinodino ( )
______________________________________________________________
This?
https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2020/08/kamala-harris-is-not-eligible-to-be-vice-president-of-the-united-states/#
The article:
The Constitution says that a vice-president must meet the same eligibility requirements as the president: "[N]o person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." Article II of the Constitution specifies "[n]o person except a natural born citizen...shall be eligible to the office of President."
Senator Kamala Harris is not, from a constitutional standpoint, a natural-born citizen of the United States. She was born on American soil, but that’s not enough to qualify for birthright citizenship. Here is the actual language of the 14th Amendment (emphasis mine throughout):“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” It’s not enough just to be born on U.S. soil. You must both be born on U.S. soil and be subject “to the jurisdiction thereof” when it happens.
It’s not even enough that one’s parents be legally present in the U.S. at the time of the child’s birth. The issue is to whom do the parents - and therefore the child - owe their ultimate allegiance. So while they may temporarily be subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S., their ultimate allegiance, the ultimate jurisdiction to which they are subject, belongs to the nation of their birth, the land where they possess citizenship and from whence they came.
Sen. Harris’ father is a Jamaican national and her mother is from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris' birth in 1964. In fact, neither of them was even a “lawful permanent resident” of the U.S. at the time. This means that she is not a "natural born citizen"—and therefore this also means she is ineligible for the office of vice-president.
John Eastman is one of the most distinguished constitutional law experts in America. He is a professor of law at Chapman University and a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute. The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction” means, he writes, “subject to the complete jurisdiction, not merely a partial jurisdiction such as that which applies to anyone temporarily sojourning in the United States (whether lawfully or unlawfully).”
Thus the fact that her parents were sojourning here legally is not decisive. The issue is not location, it is citizenship.
While most Americans, untrained in the Constitution, believe that anyone born on U.S soil is automatically a citizen, this is actually a new idea, unheard of until the late 1960s. As Eastman points out, “the Supreme Court has never held that anyone born on U.S. soil, no matter the circumstances of the parents, is automatically a U.S. citizen.” Birthright citizenship only belongs to those whose parents were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States the moment they were born.
For example, children born in the U.S. to guest workers from Mexico during the 1920s were not regarded as citizens, nor were children born to guest workers in the bracero program of the 1950s and early 1960s.
Diplomats are “subject to the jurisdiction” of their homeland. That’s why children born to diplomats in the U.S. are not citizens of the United States. Legally and constitutionally, their children are no more “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. than their parents are. If a child’s parents are not American citizens when the child is born, neither is the child.
Diplomats often use the concept of “diplomatic immunity” to get themselves and their children out of trouble on American soil by claiming that the children are not under the authority, or “jurisdiction,” of American law. All the American government can do in such circumstances is send them back to their home country. We can’t lock them up; all we can do if they misbehave is deport them.
It’s worthy of note that the word “diplomat” is not in the 14th Amendment. The children of a diplomat are not regarded as citizens by birth. This is not because their father is a diplomat, but because he is a citizen of a foreign country. Since the parents are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, neither are the children.
The logic is inescapable. If the children of foreign diplomats are not U.S. citizens by birth, how is it possible that children of temporary residents or illegal aliens could be?
A key question has to do with the precise meaning of the Jurisdiction Clause in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. The best tool for answering that question is to look at the Civil Rights Act (CRA) of 1866, enacted the same year that the Fourteenth Amendment was written by Congress.
The 14th Amendment was intended, in fact, to elevate the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to constitutional status and insulate it from legal challenge.
The Civil Rights Act included a provision to secure citizenship for former slaves, to nullify the infamous Dred Scott opinion. The provision read, “All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.”
According to the CRA, Indians who were not taxed were not eligible for citizenship. The reason they weren’t taxed by the United States was that they were subject to the “foreign power” of the sovereign Indian nations to which they belonged.
As Ken Kuklowski puts it, “The Fourteenth Amendment only commands citizenship to persons born on U.S. soil to parents who are not citizens of a foreign country.”
Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the 14th Amendment, explained the language of the amendment this way: “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
The “Jurisdiction” clause was added to the 14th Amendment only after a lengthy debate. According to NumbersUSA, Sen. Jacob Howard of Michigan proposed the amendment because he wanted to make it clear that the simple accident of birth on U.S. soil was not in fact enough to confer citizenship.
Sen. Howard said the jurisdiction requirement is “simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already,” a reference to the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
In his debate, Sen. Howard said, "[T]his will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States.”
Here is a great question: if citizenship was granted by birth alone, why did it take an act of Congress in 1922 - 54 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment - to grant citizenship to American Indians, every one of whom had been born on American soil?
Since 1795, aliens have been required to renounce allegiance to any foreign power and declare allegiance to the U.S. Constitution to become a naturalized citizen. Such allegiance was never assumed for aliens who were born here or migrated here. We have a framed copy of my great-grandfather’s renunciation of his allegiance to the Czar of Russia as a family heirloom. That renunciation was a prerequisite to his being granted full citizenship in the United States.
The way forward is simple. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives power to Congress to “enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
Some well-meaning Republican candidates are calling for an amendment to the Constitution to ban birthright citizenship. But in truth, the Constitution does NOT need to be amended. It only needs to be applied.
Bottom line: Are children of foreign sojourners American citizens? No. Why? Because the Constitution says they aren’t.
As realists, none of us expect that anything will come of all this. We long ago as a nation decided that we will not be troubled by the parts of the Constitution that are inconvenient. But perhaps it's time we started following the whole thing, not just the parts we happen to like. Kamala Harris is as good a place as any to start.
Dominion machines need to be banned from use within the USA.
Na , the Dems will require them to be USED EVERYWHERE
Not sure if anyone realizes this, but if Dominion came forward and said, “oopsie, we bad” Biden still wins and then part of the lessons learned will be to discuss how this will change.
And where, in this Kamala text you spewed, is proof of your claims of soldiers being killed while seizing a server in Germany?
Who cares. Dominion corporate, which is where this traffic came from, has absolutely nothing to do with counting ballots.
Now if you start seeing traffic from the WI or GA or MI election systems going overseas you may have something interesting.
You're only confused because the MFM wants you to be confused.
That's why they send out lying piles of rotting dogsqueezins like Jake "Resting Jake Face" Tapper and "Brain" Stelter to lie to you.
Coffee County GA elections supervisor demonstrates the Dominion voting machines - triple counting ballots, changing votes, etc
Part 1(Starts about 2:00)
https://streamable.com/u7nav7
Global voting? almost as unAmerican as you can get.. short of being a DemocRat ‘elected’ official.
“primarily Frankfurt, Germany.”
Say W***H***A***T???? Frankfurt, Germany?????
That was DEBUNKED here on FR wasn’t it? /s
D-bunked, I say, right here by the brain trust on FR.
Reading through the comments, I saw nothing from them. “crickets”
The good guys have them.
I’m sorry. The text I ‘spewed’ was in response to the Kamala comment re eligibility. I had not read the second comment regarding a SF raid or any KIA in that supposed raid.
“...Careful - Dominion will make you retract that statement and promise to never lie about them again....”
I wish they would sue.
The discovery would be absolutely DELICIOUS!!!
Dug a little deeper and found she attended a meeting at the WH on Dec. 21. No mention if in-person or phone call. Would they let her call in from GITMO to keep a ruse alive?
There was a ‘raid’ in Germany. Equipment was seized. But then the disinformation see eye ay mill activated and ridiculous stories began spewing forth eagerly promoted by the scumedia.
Hi dis.
But you have no “standing” to claim such a thing.
SCOTUS has standing, congress has standing, the president has standing, Attorney general has standing. But none of them have expressed anything about Kamala’s ineligibility.
Therefore socialist Kamala will be sworn in as VP, unless PDJT has some ace up his sleeve to stop the steal.
I would love to be the cameraman recording Melania going up to Sen. Harris and making a citizen's arrest for felony fraud by Harris declaring she is a qualified Natural Born Citizen. Bear in mind that Melania is a Naturalized US citizen, something Native born Sen. Harris neglected to do, even after her father was Naturalized as a US citizen. But Globalist-socialist Kamala never declared to which country (India, Jamaica, US) she was a loyal citizen.
And right now, without the evidence of the packets going overseas from the election, it might be a good backup for Trump's strategy .... WHAT strategy?
No. Adjudication can be performed by the computer, if the proper options are selected.
The Socialists/Democrats have spent the last 20 years perfecting election theft while the Republicans/Conservatives have watched and done nothing but walk in circles, bump into walls and each other while yelling; “Don’t you know how important I am?”
Yes there was a raid in Frankfurt Germany and reports indicate that we did get it.
It appears that Rep. Louie Gohmert of Louisiana was the first to go public with the story. According to Congressman Gohmert, "the CIA was completely excluded from this operation."
Check out the following report from Gateway Pundit. The Louie Gohmert video is included.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/going-server-reportedly-obtained-germany-related-2020-election/
This "no standing" twaddle is analogous to a public swimming pool in which five bathers decided to violate the "no peeing" rule.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.