Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: SeekAndFind
in a dictatorship the citizens have no standing. No one is willing to start picking off politicians so that’s the end of it.
2 posted on
12/22/2020 9:31:13 AM PST by
wiseprince
(Me,)
To: SeekAndFind
...did not adequately allege an injury...
Present tense. The injury happens after the election counts votes that are not verifiable. But then it’s too late to sue, from what I understand.
Perhaps this is necessary to support the “after election” suit.
3 posted on
12/22/2020 9:32:15 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(We killed our economy and damaged our culture. In 2021 we will pine for the salad days of 2020.)
To: SeekAndFind
Who has standing if not the Republican party?
And, if the lawsuit occurs after the election, the court will rule it was filed too late.
4 posted on
12/22/2020 9:32:52 AM PST by
Kazan
To: SeekAndFind
Kangaroo Court
5 posted on
12/22/2020 9:33:27 AM PST by
COBOL2Java
(Hunter Biden's dreaming of a white Christmas)
To: SeekAndFind
As usual, CCP Paid district court found the complainants lacked standing.
7 posted on
12/22/2020 9:36:46 AM PST by
BigEdLB
(All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)
To: SeekAndFind
Once again the courts have dropped the ball. I am shocked! Shocked! /s
9 posted on
12/22/2020 9:37:45 AM PST by
Nateman
(Democracy dies with voted fraud darkness.)
To: SeekAndFind
Was this a 2-1 decision or a 3-0 decision?
To: SeekAndFind
Now put your mask back on and pay more taxes.
12 posted on
12/22/2020 9:41:42 AM PST by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: SeekAndFind
If this is not standing, what is?
Our courts are now as political as everything else in America.
13 posted on
12/22/2020 9:45:01 AM PST by
volunbeer
(Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
To: SeekAndFind
What good are constitutional protections if nobody has standing to assert them?
To: SeekAndFind
How many Judges did China put on the benches the last few decades?
Now ya know. Lots of ‘em.
16 posted on
12/22/2020 9:50:50 AM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!! Help beat the leftist media at their own game.)
To: SeekAndFind
“But, just as in Jacobson, the absentee ballot statute puts the duty to ‘compare the signature’ and accept or reject a ballot on the ‘registrar or clerk’ – not the secretary of state.” If this were Roberts deciding, he'd have "interpreted" that they meant the Secretary of State and all underling direct-reports, and ruled on it that way. It's only when it's a case brought by Republicans that they nuance every word and phrase and toss it on the first mis-dotted i.
17 posted on
12/22/2020 9:51:43 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: SeekAndFind
The ‘lack standing’ argument doesn’t flush here! It is nonsense. The court was terrified to take the case.
To: SeekAndFind
The situation will not change. Never again will our nation be one nation. Before there is any relief, before there is any recompense for the injustice, before there is any exoneration for those falsely accused, Jesus will descend to receive those awaiting His soon return. He alone will satisfy those who are children of His father. What a glorious day it will be!
19 posted on
12/22/2020 9:54:31 AM PST by
scottiemom
(As a retired Texas public school teacher, I highly reccomend private school.)
To: SeekAndFind
Never going to wait for a cop to rescue me. (lesson from BLM)
Never going to ask a judge to settle my disputes. (lesson from election fraud)
Never going to trust a doctor to heal me. (lesson from ccp virus)
20 posted on
12/22/2020 9:54:49 AM PST by
conservativeimage
(I’d rather die a free spirit than enter into heaven without a soul.)
To: SeekAndFind
As expected.
File before? “No harm, no standing”
File after? “Too late, sitting on your laches”
So you simply can’t win.
Crooked, corrupt “courts”, playing defense for their overseers.
22 posted on
12/22/2020 9:56:03 AM PST by
Regulator
(It's Fraud, Jim)
To: SeekAndFind
This just proves the need to use the insurrection act. All the people that told us that America was being infiltrated should not sound so kooky now.
26 posted on
12/22/2020 10:03:27 AM PST by
Revel
To: SeekAndFind
So it’s ok to steal the January 5th election then? I’m starting to feel like our country has already been taken over.
To: SeekAndFind
Not unexpected. We are in Art. 2 territory now; courts and executive branches are not actively involved. Except the courts can be asked to declare the election UNLAWFUL for violating the state election laws, and leave the action to the Electoral College when they meet. For a court case in WA to be introduced, for example, it should be filed in the District court first. An UNLAWFUL court finding neatly neutralizes the certification by the Governor of his slate of Electors as a tie breaker.
29 posted on
12/22/2020 10:17:08 AM PST by
RideForever
(We were born to be tested)
To: SeekAndFind
Just refile and add Perdue and Loeffer to the suit.
If anyone has standing they ndo.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson