Posted on 12/14/2020 6:35:34 PM PST by Colorado Doug
They keep saying "no proof" well here's the proof and lots of it. I didn't see this in search so here you go. This is the forensic audit of the machines in Antrim County Michigan and RATCLIFFE PULLS NO PUNCHES. He call the fraud, fraud.
Ware is a small county but the algorithm apparently switches votes based on the overall Biden deficit and the size of the county registered voter list. You can't add too many to a small county without drawing suspicion!
What's important is that the voting machines in two different states did the same thing: Took votes from Trump and added them to Biden. It wasn't a glitch, it wasn't human error, it was a designed feature of the program. Pick the winner and the machine makes it happen!
Bttt
This is extremely important and the key. This is why the so-called "Cosplay" selection of alternate electors, called by some here on FR, happened yesterday.
one of the local folks running didn’t even carry his own household showed up in the original report. Ding ding ding we have a winner
Ok, if that is the case it should be better explained in the report. If they are trying to state that this data and the rest of their findings evinces proof of or high likelihood of statewide fraud, then they should state that in the report, not allude to it in a nebulous manner.
The fact that only this year’s server logs are missing for the time of the vote and the counting as well as audit trails and other things being deleted, those are damning enough in and of themselves. If they are trying to point from this to that then they should be saying something to the effect of: the information that they have gathered leads them to believe that there is a much greater likelihood of malfeasance throughout the state that needs to be investigated or audited based on their findings here.
I write reports for failure analysis, and I would never consider being this vague about what point I am trying to get across or what I might construe from data that I have seen.
That’s not the point of the report. The point of the report is to show that the results vary widely with the same ballots. That it affected Trump and Biden in particular is a side-effect.
Then my point stands. The statement directly below the table is incongruent with the data in the table. There was no flip from Trump to Biden shown in the data in that table, quite the opposite.
No. Your point fails. The first line in the table is a flip, as it is with most of the other races/referendums.
Evidence ping
No, the first line in the table shows a tabulation error caused by what was initially called human error, a point which the report (or at least a part of it) is attempting to refute.
The second line shows a hand recount or adjudication recount fix attempt that was made due to the supposed human error.
The third line shows a recount with only a slight variance from the previous date.
The table overall shows that there is a wide variance from initially reported numbers, it does not show an overall flip from Trump to Biden as is asserted in paragraph B (4) right below the table.
More rightly paragraph 4 should be clear about what each entry shows (row 1 being what they are calling a flip if that is really what it is) and be less generalized about it. The statement in said paragraph leads the reader to believe the table is being discussed in a general sense, not specific entries. They should just come right out and state that the entry shows a tabulation error that favored Biden (row 1 of the table) and was later found and an attempt to properly adjudicate was made (row 2), then state that the SOS and Antrim county clerk explained the tabulation error on election night as human error, but the audit shows otherwise.
I just think the report is sloppy and easily misconstrued and could be easily remedied by providing a cleaner/clearer explanation.
We cannot let this stand
AZ to be audited too:
Mark Finchem
@MarkFinchem
SUBPOENAS ISSUED! Forensic Audit to be completed
https://twitter.com/MarkFinchem/status/1338863322641309701?s=20
Thank you. Praying hard🙏❤
We will NEVER see reporting in the mainstream news on this ...they’re actively trying to prevent us from seeing it.
But the courts will see it.
Thanks. With all the focus on Pennsylvania, sometimes the other thefts are overlooked.
It will probably be one of these overlooked states that will bust it wide open, IMO. I think Virginia really needs looked at, they had the craziest things happening with their numbers.
GA I don’t know know, Dominion-wise, of there will be any way to audit now that these machines es are being used for the Senate races, which really upset me.
Fakebook is disputing it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.