Posted on 12/14/2020 6:25:15 AM PST by SeekAndFind
In the video below, Kevin Freeman interviews technology expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, who explains how, with access to the physical ballots and the digital ballots in their native, unencrypted format, his team can process millions of ballots per day and determine conclusively which ballots are illegitimate.
Pulitzer points out that by law, we the people own both the paper ballots and the scanned copies of ballots for 22 months after the election. He maintains that the Trump legal teams have been requesting the wrong evidence, that we only need access to audit the ballots on very simple visual terms.
CLICK ON THE ABOVE ARTICLE LINK FOR THE VIDEO OF THE INTERVIEW OR COPY THIS LINK TO YOUR BROWSER:
https://youtu.be/UgeqGmvQXKs
For example, every mailed out ballot was folded by machines and blown into envelopes. Pulitzer describes how machines can detect the forensic evidence left by a crease due to what he calls a kinematic fold, so fake ballots that were fed into counting machines from never folded sheets can be flagged.
Legitimate ballots can be checked for upper-level encoding — that is, the standards by which the election council determines how the ballot is to be printed. As part of these standards, all ballots contain hidden codes not visible to the naked eye which identify the printer from which they were printed.
Also, ballots that were marked by machine can be identified by the lack of marks left by the impact of a pen on the paper. Ballots marked by machines can be checked for perfectly identical, recurring patterns of marks that can be produced only by machines.
This 20-minute video is worth viewing. Let's hope Republican legal teams, legislators, senators, etc. see it and bang on Pulitzer's door.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Well maybe the records have to be maintained but that doesn’t give anyone the right to inspect them. No standing. Laches. You knew the election was going to be stolen yet did not stop it. Too late.
My thoughts exactly.
Let’s hope Republican legal teams, legislators, senators, etc. see it and bang on Pulitzer’s door.
Seriously??? This is well known to anyone familiar with the forensics behind it and NOT thinking legal teams already know this is pathetic and grasping at straws at this point.
The whole issue is getting access to the machines and the ballots. That’s always been the problem.
Records do not need to be searched. “You gotta know when to hold them,
know when to fold them.”
One lady to testified at the Georgia Senate hearing Rudy put on - she’s worked there over 20+ years... She made a comment that was NOT repeated but should have been. She said she SAW that a large number of ballots were OBVIOUSLY copied - as they had the markings in the middle of a crease but they themselves were not ever folded but perfectly flat. I.e., they were copies of a previous ballot that WAS folded. CLEAR FRAUD.
But NO ONE has screamed this loud enough. This is one of the points made above - legit mail-in ballots have a fold crease. Copied or manufactured do not.
The primary method of the deep state of retaining their power is sequestering information and evidence. If they can continue to prevent the people from seeing the facts, they will never be legally stopped.
Sadly the SCOTUS won’t recognize the President or his team as having a legitimate interest in the election. DC=Scum City
Unfortunately, i have been advising Republican leaders here in PA on similar auditing principles. Getting the meta data on database updates. Postage counts and actual print logs. Similar to this guys analysis. The problem is each state may have different processes. Mailing is the same. some place my not use mailing machinery. ( to small a volume) Philly no doubt to get the numbers just reprinted the non returned mailed out ballots and processed them in house. Then updated the database to reflect returned ballot status to approach balancing the books. Those people caught with voting overtop their already updated were just treated as anomalies.
There are several places where the trail is visible.
Post office photographs the front and back of every item it receives.
There is a record as to WHO voted in the election. (This is not supposed to show for whom they voted.)
Anyway, I am not an expert on this, but there is more than enough evidence available. For a lot of reasons the people in power are putting up a huge fight to prevent access to the evidence in order to keep this fraud on track.
were OBVIOUSLY copied - as they had the markings in the middle of a crease but they themselves were not ever folded but perfectly flat. I.e., they were copies of a previous ballot that WAS folded. CLEAR FRAUD.>> And the fix or at least slow down for this is to make the print function at least create a machine readable or paper that cannot be copied. like check stock. There are counter measures to the papar. Blue spectrum visibility thru the copy process. Big Blue COPY on the paper.
It’s amazing what modern forensics can do in criminal cases, so it’s good to learn that it can be useful here as well. And, once fraudulent ballots had been identified, they could be tested for fingerprints and touch DNA to identify the perpetrators.
A history of contested presidential elections, from Samuel Tilden to Al Gore
https://theconversation.com/a-history-of-contested-presidential-elections-from-samuel-tilden-to-al-gore-149414
What happens if the US election is contested?
https://www.wtva.com/content/news/What-happens-if-the-US-election-is-contested—572922901.html
Trump’s team should demand this guy be allowed to run the
process of evaluating the mail in ballots.
It’s not too late. As long as those ballots exist, it’s
still possible to evaluate them.
This guy is the inventor of a number of very high tech
things we all use. He has excellent standing to do
something like this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.