Well maybe the records have to be maintained but that doesn’t give anyone the right to inspect them. No standing. Laches. You knew the election was going to be stolen yet did not stop it. Too late.
Let’s hope Republican legal teams, legislators, senators, etc. see it and bang on Pulitzer’s door.
Seriously??? This is well known to anyone familiar with the forensics behind it and NOT thinking legal teams already know this is pathetic and grasping at straws at this point.
The whole issue is getting access to the machines and the ballots. That’s always been the problem.
One lady to testified at the Georgia Senate hearing Rudy put on - she’s worked there over 20+ years... She made a comment that was NOT repeated but should have been. She said she SAW that a large number of ballots were OBVIOUSLY copied - as they had the markings in the middle of a crease but they themselves were not ever folded but perfectly flat. I.e., they were copies of a previous ballot that WAS folded. CLEAR FRAUD.
But NO ONE has screamed this loud enough. This is one of the points made above - legit mail-in ballots have a fold crease. Copied or manufactured do not.
Sadly the SCOTUS won’t recognize the President or his team as having a legitimate interest in the election. DC=Scum City
Unfortunately, i have been advising Republican leaders here in PA on similar auditing principles. Getting the meta data on database updates. Postage counts and actual print logs. Similar to this guys analysis. The problem is each state may have different processes. Mailing is the same. some place my not use mailing machinery. ( to small a volume) Philly no doubt to get the numbers just reprinted the non returned mailed out ballots and processed them in house. Then updated the database to reflect returned ballot status to approach balancing the books. Those people caught with voting overtop their already updated were just treated as anomalies.
There are several places where the trail is visible.
Post office photographs the front and back of every item it receives.
There is a record as to WHO voted in the election. (This is not supposed to show for whom they voted.)
Anyway, I am not an expert on this, but there is more than enough evidence available. For a lot of reasons the people in power are putting up a huge fight to prevent access to the evidence in order to keep this fraud on track.
It’s amazing what modern forensics can do in criminal cases, so it’s good to learn that it can be useful here as well. And, once fraudulent ballots had been identified, they could be tested for fingerprints and touch DNA to identify the perpetrators.