Posted on 12/13/2020 4:47:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
With time running out for President Trump, attorney Sidney Powell is raising the option for the commander in chief to invoke his 2018 executive order concerning foreign interference in U.S. elections.
The order, signed by Trump on Sept. 12, 2018, states "not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election."
Powell told the Epoch Times the evidence of foreign interference is "more than sufficient to trigger" the order, providing the president "all kinds of power ... to do everything from seize assets to freeze things, demand the impoundment of the [voting] machines."
"Under the emergency powers, he could even appoint a special prosecutor to look into this, which is exactly what needs to happen," Powell continued.
"Every machine, every voting machine in the country should be impounded right now. There's frankly more than enough criminal probable cause to justify that, for anybody who's willing to address the law and the facts purely on the basis of truth and not politics, or corporate greed, or global wealth."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Woods wouldn’t have known where to even look if my friend hadn’t reported his findings to the WH a week after the election. There was no grand plan. It’s all been winging it because honestly the good guys knew the bad guys were going to cheat, they just never had an idea of how much. The Trump legal team has been on the defensive ever since. It’s maddening.
How can you have evidence in direct video of all the illegal voting and not have a case? Where is the justice department? I mean the entire department is like it’s absent.
“cannot get over how they are incapable of assembling a winning case—before any court.”
Every case could be, and probably has been, 100% a “winning case”. First, judges are politicians now and are not dedicated to justice. Second, there have been very credible reports of horrible threats to family, children, and even pets.
Just because cases have been lost doesn’t mean they weren’t winning cases in a normal and decent country.
{This is not about the lawyers.}
I agree with your assessment and suppose Trump’s team is doing their utmost to do what must be done.
The failure lies with the courts, whose judges are intimidated, biased and reluctant to get involved for fear of personal retribution and inciting civil unrest.
I pray that the remaining legal challenges will receive proper hearings and that a healthy dose of courage infuses our courtrooms in time to save our Republic!!!
all the major networks are NOT covering anything and if they do, its "baseless" which is the narrative sent out by TPTB....
This needed to be done sooner.
We're more than five weeks after the election and we are still having time controlling one little set of machines in one measly rural county in Michigan.
Please convey to your friend a sincere THANK YOU.
Thank him for having the courage and love of our country to take the action that he did.
C7S
You obviously have read my posts in the past and you have not followed up on my posts since this one.
I’m pissed because with all her court filings, and all her Krakin, now she is telling trump he has to invoke Marshall law? Sorry, but all hat and no cattle. She is asking trump to make up for the legal teams failure. They have played this like they expect the other side to give them a break. The deep state was never going to do that.
Wood already had an affidavit from one of the witnesses from State Farm prior to getting the subpoena. Their affidavit in his TRO filing.
Please read my post #43.
I understand that. I haven’t heard one single explanation from Sydney as to why? You have to ask that question.
Please see my post #43.
Yes, but they didn’t have a witness to the video footage.
Legal teams failure? LOL, who the F are you?
I’ve read every one of the legal briefs, the evidence and facts are laid out in plain damn english.
The only problem here is partisan black robes, because it’s pretty damn obvious that the biggest election heist in history was done, and very sloppily so.
The sloppy part? Well, what if you knew that the legal system was crooked too, on the take?
There’s one answer to this, one answer only.
She has filed cases with SCOTUS, so it’s not like she’s punting.
She is talking about the EO because she has found foreign interference in our election.
I can’t imagine that President Trump would set both those executive orders in place if he didn’t intend to use them.
Evidently he doesn’t intend to allow the Uniparty quislings to turn the USA over to China.
If he triggers Executive Order 13848 it will precipitate the civil war we have all been expecting.
“By any means necessary” cuts both ways.
IIRC everybody knew about the cameras and there is a claim that they showed the tapes to the observers within 24 - 48 hours because they were not there during the portion of the night/early next morning.
If she had more, she wouldn’t be punting to POTUS to ride in and save the day. JMO
Your post to me said they didn’t know where to look. My response was yes they did. Also, everyone knows these sports arenas have security cameras, they have to for liability issues.
I am not discounting your friend and I appreciate his coming forward, but using his knowledge to try to make a point that the attorneys dropped the ball is a stretch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.