Posted on 12/09/2020 10:21:20 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
YouTube says it will no longer allow users to upload videos claiming that President Trump lost the 2020 presidential election due to fraud.
The video streaming giant made the announcement in a Wednesday blog post titled “Supporting the 2020 US election.”........."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
There was no Biden victory....only Biden THEFT.
So a platform with the 230 exemption can ban political speech which is explicitly stated in the Constitution but they would not be able to ban “gay, lesbian or bisexual” videos because it is against anti-discrimination laws, which are not in the Constitution? Got it....
I’ll have to try that next time! I never thought of it, though now that I think of it, I’ve seen people do that on Twitter.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3914001/posts
"It'll even scan a batch of blank ballots and vote for whoever you tell it to! (Video)" (NOT a YouTube video)
For example: You can collect 960 mailed-in ballots for Trump, and [administratively] mess them up enough to *force 'adjudication'* and then shred/trash those Trump ballots . . . and then substitute 960 pre-printed blank ballots and "administratively adjudicate" the blanks, for Biden.
As Freeper "Golden Eagle" points out:
According to one of the witnesses in Georgia, she said they printed tens if not hundreds of thousands of "test" ballots in Fulton county in the days before the election.This was her job, and they supposedly wanted that many to test not only 5e machines but also the logistics of simply moving that many ballots around. Her portion printed was just a fraction of all those printed by everyone, who could select whoever they wanted in the ballot.
But on election day, she said for some reason they were keeping all these supposed "test" ballots there in close proximity to real ballots. She said she took a couple of test ballots, and fed them into the election day counter just to verify that they wouldn’t be counted.
BUT THEY WERE counted.
When she pointed this out to her supervisors she was ignored. And of course those boxes of ballots were moved around later that night after she left for the night.
What is needed is a group like anon hacking ALL the MSM and ‘social(ist) media’ giants and releasing the results on THEIR OWN websites. Let the WORLD know IN DEPTH how crooked they are! We need a kind of Stuxnet to ‘out’ these socialistic crony capitalists!
THAT’S what I want from Santa this year! I also want the Texas (and many other States) lawsuit to WIN in the USSC and for them to disallow the results from the fraudulent elections! THAT is the recipe for a VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS!
I ask much of Santa, but he’s a big guy and I’ve been pretty good this year!
But everyone knows that bit, right. This was surely all Zuckerberg’s idea."
I had forgotten that, and no doubt he was aware of Lifelog given he had a pretty good tutor and attended college classes at Mercy while at Exeter; yet he had already created “Zucknet” (and later of course "Synapse").
You should really enjoy the movie more than most because the first 15 minutes (after it wades through some lawsuit exposition) ties Zucknet (without naming it) into FB's fast and furious scale-up, but the raison d'etre -- and I won't spoil it for you -- paints Zuckerberg as a fatally-flawed human being to his core and Sorkin just keeps driving that home during the length of the film. Schadenfreudic overdrive.
And even so, I'd rather make a business deal with Zuck, than Jack @ Twitter or the 2-headed dog at Google.
It was more than just awareness. It was a transfer of IP. DARPA was catching ethical flack, so they found the guy and kicked it to the private sector. Literally, the day LifeLog folded, the next day FB was incorporated.
Very eerie.
SKIP ALL ADS, BUT CRUSH THEIR SURVEYS, and pass this around.
FRmail me to be added to or removed from my irregular ping list.
Chocolate rations have increased! Double-plus good, eh?
The Democrats are making ‘1984’ happen.
I used uBlock Origin and never had any ads. Don’t much go there anymore.
1984...that was either a dystopic novel by George Orwell, or the year that Ronald Reagan won a second term by a huge landslide. Which have the Democrats made happen.
1. Orwell novel.
2. Landslide victory for conservative icon.
or
3. Both of the above.
tx
Facebooger and Twatter are apparently all in on crushing election dumpster dissent as well. I tried to post a well-done Canadian essay on the dumpster, and Facebooger rejected it because of some “community standards” mumbo jumbo, and Twatter claimed that the link was potentially harmful without specifying a reason (virus, adware, “hate speech”, etc.).
I’m also on MeWe, Parler and Gab.
Well when Trump is inaugurated and make no mistake he will be, it will be perfect not to have any Trump stole the election material playing.
Just a note here 1984 is not read in school anymore. Getting it left right and center.
great idea. I already skip all ads, but this is even more devastating.
Great idea.
Interesting.
There’s a movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.