Posted on 12/09/2020 10:21:20 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
YouTube says it will no longer allow users to upload videos claiming that President Trump lost the 2020 presidential election due to fraud.
The video streaming giant made the announcement in a Wednesday blog post titled “Supporting the 2020 US election.”........."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
And what happens when SCOTUS takes Biden’s victory away?
Oh... what happens if someone claims election fraud in comments of liberal videos?
Wow. They’ve lifted the mask.
I’ve said for years that the left owns the MSM but the right owns the internet. By owns, I mean controls the vernacular. Look at a CNN youtube video and you will see tons of comments from conservatives effectively destroying leftists. And look at Fox videos and you won’t even see many leftists.
The tool of the left is emotion and the tool of the right is logic. On the internet, logic gets a say - and always wins. So their only hope is to simply silence the right. It’s why so many “MSM” print sites on the internet don’t allow comments. The right presents logic and strong evidence while the left uses the following most of the time:
Ad hominem attack.
Deflection
Projection
Fortunately, there are other internet sources that will do to youtube what Newsmax is doing to Fox.
Despite being somewhat invested in Google stock, I’m looking forward to the day that the company is split up the way AT&T was. Baby Googles?
Maybe nothing or perhaps banning the questioner.
{And what happens when SCOTUS takes Biden’s victory away?}
If only we are so blessed to find out exactly what the reactions will be when this miraculous eventuality transpires!!!
As PDJT tweeted today, “Our country needs a VICTORY!”
A sure sign of a country having free and fair elections is not being allowed to question there being free and fair elections.
“And what happens when SCOTUS takes Biden’s victory away?”
We all laugh.
Who owns youtube / google / alphabet?
Probably you do if you have a retirement account.
https://money.cnn.com/quote/shareholders/shareholders.html?symb=GOOGL&subView=institutional
If the election *is* overturned, I think that YouTube’s decision qualifies as treasonous.
Who would will the power to split up Big Tech?
When do the gulags open? Where will they be located? In Oregon?
We lost freedom of speech several years ago. The government willingly allows private businesses to persecute us for our thoughts.
You Tube got their marching orders from China!
Basically admitting they’re a publisher, not a platform.
Get rid of 230 protection.
And President Trump won because the fraud has been discovered and all they has to do is throw out non-legal votes and reverse engineer the vote counts that were changed by software to know the truth beyond their wishful thinking.
The 42:00m mark at the video summarizes how the program works.
Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html
Part of the Summary Description at Video link;
Quote
“That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.
10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).”
“And what happens when SCOTUS takes Biden’s victory away?”
.... the Leftists have already answered that question. The real question is what are we on the Right going to do about it?
"Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections. For example, we will remove videos claiming that a Presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come. As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific or artistic context." -- Susan Wojcicki, CEO, YouTube
This is extraordinary censorship. Texas v PA analysis? Censored.
We have a problem that elections cannot solve. We have people like Susan in positions that they are incapable of performing (it's called "The Peter Principle). Corporatism is one thing but when they enable an Orweillian State, it has to be fought, to the end.
Big Government is outsourcing totalitarianism to Big Tech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.