Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects appeal to limit transgender students
The Associated Press ^ | December 7, 2020

Posted on 12/07/2020 8:22:59 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court declined Monday to take up an appeal from parents in Oregon who want to prevent transgender students from using locker rooms and bathrooms of the gender with which they identify, rather than their sex assigned at birth.

The case came from a school district near Salem, Oregon’s capital city. The federal appeals court in San Francisco had upheld a Dallas, Oregon, school district policy that allows transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity.

Parents sued over the policy in 2017, saying it caused embarrassment and stress.

A lower court refused to block the policy and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that ruling, writing that the school district did not violate students’ constitutional rights or a law that protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs.

Similar lawsuits have been dismissed by courts in other parts of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaynewsrooms; homofascism; homosexualagenda; maninadress; perferts; perverts; pinkjournalism; school; scotus; tranny; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Coronal

Not at all disagreeing with you— they aren’t just citing it. They ran it word for word.

So, yeah. What you said.


81 posted on 12/07/2020 9:36:28 AM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

It’s apparently good enough for Breitbart.


82 posted on 12/07/2020 9:36:50 AM PST by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Then there was no reason to go to the AssPress, give them ad revenue and clicks. Would have been much better to use Brietbart, right?

Brietbart shouldn’t just reprint AssPress articles without editing them, but at least Brietbart is a legitimate source.

The link I provided from Law and Crime contains much more information.

The best source here would be the Supreme Court’s docket.


83 posted on 12/07/2020 9:38:07 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nd76

THIS is the best source of information.


84 posted on 12/07/2020 9:38:35 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

My original post was from CBS News, which cited the AP account, same as Breitbart.


85 posted on 12/07/2020 9:41:28 AM PST by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Never said I did, swine.

You're issuing commands as to what sources to post here.

You aren't in charge of jack.

FR, thank goodness, will ignore you.

86 posted on 12/07/2020 9:41:33 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Oh, I touched a nerve in you. Your worship of the AssPress is very telling.

Yeah, you did. I DESPISE IDIOCY.

I also hate AP.

But when they run a straight news story, as they did here – and which ALL of your "alternative sources" actually rely on – I can actually tell the difference.

You can't.

By the way, you've been on FR for five minutes, so step the hell back and learn what we do here.

87 posted on 12/07/2020 9:45:42 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Geesh, you mean he's NOT a "proven originalist in the Scalia mold" and Trump DIDN'T "cement a conservative majority on the Supreme Court for generations to come"?

I'm shocked I tell ya, shocked.

88 posted on 12/07/2020 9:53:42 AM PST by BillyBoy ("States rights" is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Kamala Harris is the senator who initiated the race back to DC to add language which would include sexual preference to the classes protected by civil rights cases. She put it in the “anti-lynching bill” after the Jesse Smollett total fraud incident.

The definition of lynching in that bill is something like ..... more than one person doing anything at all to harm a person in a protected class. It is not what most people think of as a lynching.

I do not think it was ever signed into law but it probably will be if we do not have Trump in the White House.

89 posted on 12/07/2020 9:55:50 AM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“Ve haff veys to mek you sashay!” the poofters will not be denied.


90 posted on 12/07/2020 9:58:14 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
THIS is the best source of information.
"this place" links to AP all the time; this is the first time I saw anyone freak out over it.
91 posted on 12/07/2020 10:00:13 AM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

I didn’t “issue” any “command” so apparently you can’t read either.

So what wonderful “job” do you have that “evaluates” sources that also doesn’t require you to be able to read?


92 posted on 12/07/2020 10:00:25 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

And that’s the problem. In Soviet Russia, the people knew Pravada was a propaganda outlet and they treated it as such.

Here in the U.S. we have various propaganda outlets and our side treats them as credible and worthy of defending. In essence we are paying the enemy to enslave us.


93 posted on 12/07/2020 10:03:16 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
In Ohio, men get punished in divorce.

So, make it so that the pitcher gets punished in divorce.

94 posted on 12/07/2020 10:07:04 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So young Muslim girls must share a bathroom with men?


95 posted on 12/07/2020 10:09:30 AM PST by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
I didn’t “issue” any “command” so apparently you can’t read either.

Here are your own words:

Quit treating the AssPress like it is legitimate.

That is a command. Words mean things.

And thank goodness people will ignore you.

Over and out.

96 posted on 12/07/2020 10:10:36 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

That’s not a command, swine.


97 posted on 12/07/2020 10:11:33 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Stravinsky

Kagan’s got the 9th circuit. She could have killed any appeal on her own.

If she referred it to the whole court, Alito Thomas and Barrett may have thought they couldn’t win. Refusing a case doesn’t set a precedent.


98 posted on 12/07/2020 10:12:22 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The “end” is not “near”...
It has come & gone...

Roberts is the most dangerous SCOTUS member of the past 60 years...
He, clearly, was one of the greatest accomplishments of communist stage-acting of this century...

Felix Dzerzhinsky would be proud... He saved the communist revolution in Russia... Now his strategies have promoted and saved the communist revolution in America...


99 posted on 12/07/2020 10:26:37 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

>>Let little Emma get molested in the locker room where Joe, aka Jane, hasn’t lost his attraction to girls.

Joe identifies as a lesbian and is exploring his feminine side.


100 posted on 12/07/2020 10:52:52 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Who built the cages, Joe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson