Posted on 12/03/2020 12:25:15 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
Edited on 12/03/2020 3:02:29 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
“Well, sir, it don’t look too good, that’s the truth. But we like the way the election turned out...so we don’t see why we should do anything about it.”
Hugo Chavez would be proud of the urban Atlanta vote stealers.
So would Joseph Stalin.
Under Oath Testimony, my ass. National Security Letters, Swat RAIDS, Tell them Right in front of their Family they are Facing a CAPITOL OFFENSE and will be EXECUTED upon Conviction, say your goodbyes now.
With a National Security Letter they can go through everything they have done and with whom as far back as they wish, and I mean Anything and Everything electronic, including Voice calls from ANYWHERE.
In my Book, this Amounts to TREASON!!!
Excellent question !
Nary a peep from Loeffler and Perdue.
Probably just Do-Nuts hidden in suitcases. then hidden underneath
a table only to be pulled out when GOP Observers were sent home.
š“š“š“š“š“š“š“š“
That’s pissing me off, not only them, but Republicans all over the country.
Listening to these people testify tells me the entire process was illegitimate - If I were there no way I could in good conscious certify.
Then go find a safe space to sit in Debbie downer...
Lol
It looks like two of my uncles and a cousin in that picture :-)
This is an old video?
glimmerman70 just signed up for FR in November after the election. I would not pay too much attention to his comments when he doesn’t have a source.
“Governor Kemp will say that the suitcases contained doughnuts for the vote counters.”
I do believe that in Detroit, food delivery trucks were used to deliver containers full of ballots.
Imagine if those D’rat Detroiters used that creative thief’s moxy to hold a job, to be and stay married, to clean up their neighborhoods...
Thanks for the link.
There is so much being posted that it becomes near impossible to keep up.
The legal team just discovered existence of this video yesterday. Although, in a typical Democrat reflex, the democrat committee woman said that it was debunked a month ago.
SHOCKING.. where have I heard that before?
Hahahahah...we know it...WE KNOW!!!
“You’re assuming the SCOTUS will even hear the case.”
He is not a man of empty words when it comes to matters of substance. He was - again, IMHO - giving a very clear warning to the SCOTUS that they had better hear these cases and make a decision that is consistent with preserving our Republic. He specifically indicated that our country would cease to exist if this stolen election stood. The warning is clear - “handle it legally to preserve the peace, because if you don’t, then I will handle it by other means that won’t necessarily be so peaceful or accepted by most of our population.”
So either the SCOTUS understands that, or we have a huge problem - because Trump’s speech was nothing else if not a very clear indication that he is NOT backing down, that he will do what is necessary to preserve the Republic. He clearly put the ball in their court (no pun intended, but it works anyway).
With Barrett on the Court, I think that they will take the cases...but time (and not a lot of it) will tell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.