Posted on 11/30/2020 11:18:46 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Because her theory that votes were switched in SW is the opposite from the other cases that fraudulent votes were cast or created, mostly on paper. If we want to know how the election was stolen we need to see that paper. If the paper has been destroyed the results should be thrown out.
In contrast her theory that votes were switched by software or in a remote server is hard to prove and easy to disprove and the case will be tossed. My example is here in Virginia where results are sent from each precinct to the counties to the state. No SW or foreigner can change the numbers unless the tabulator was biased. In that case we would need a hand recount. Just one precinct would probably be sufficient (1 or 2 thousand ballots).
Who the hell does he think he is?
*************
He’s just another elitist who lives inside the DC bubble.
Why does Tucker think that he’s so important that she should play her hand early.
____
Like Bill O’Reilly before him, believing his own headlines.. Bill used to say “everybody knows to win an election you have to come through the factor”...
Nope, because what happened was a clarification measure. Powell is not being paid by the White House. She is not on their payroll and is working independently from the Trump team. But, is still working along side them towards the same goal.
The would depend on the plaintiff not the lawyer. I have not heard anywhere that Powell or Wood are the Plaintiffs in these suits - just the lawyers.
And in other news, the crowing of the cock caused the Sun to rise ...
lol... its almost as bad as walking up behind a best friend and over hearing him talkin shit about you... smmfh... What a damned disappointment soooooo many people are turning out to be.
Nope.....the last thing anyone should think is that President Trump makes decisions on what a TV talking head thinks or does...
...”Why does Tucker think that he’s so important that she should play her hand early.”
That seems to happen all too often on FR. Some just can’t get over not being able to have evidence and proof NOW. Doesn’t seem to matter if the info/proof is equivalent to Top Secret or Eyes Only - they want it now...or it doesn’t exist. It’s getting harder to contribute and read that crap.
Tucker is not in charge of ANYTHING. He can take his demands and stuff them.
Rudy already explained the split.
There’s not much time left for Powell to present her evidence. Whatever she’s got, it must come out soon. I’m more than happy to wait for the few weeks that are left, and I’m not going to jump to condemn a woman who seems to be supporting the president. Let’s wait and see - it won’t be long.
No. Carlson is a windbag that couldn’t make a dollar doing anything else. BOYCOTT FOX
Did Auto-correct change my description from ‘toady group’ to ‘today group’?
Lin Wood is a Georgian voter?
Yes, Lin Woods lives in Georgia. He is filing his own election contest in Georgia.
Six months from now, if nothing changes, Biden will be sitting in the oval office. What good is it to establish then that he cheated to get there? They won't remove him. So what's the point of a slow moving lawsuit? To stop it from happening in the future? news flash: a Biden administration is not going to take steps to correct the fraud mechanisms that they used to steal the Presidency. Far from it.
Sidney’s work is still important.
She’s already got an injunction against wiping the machines in Georgia.
She has raised awareness that there are major issues that aren’t being addressed by Giuliani’s legislation.
That awareness is helping Giuliani’s call for public hearings with legislatures.
There may be judicial remedies implemented in the future that Biden and the states will have to comply with.
.
Hmm... let’s see perhaps Sidney jumped the shark by accusing the CIA, Soros, Chavez, and China all conspiring to hack the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.