Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox

If I understand the facts of this correctly, then the Federal courts aren’t likely to touch it. I’m pretty sure the legal challenge was based on the Pennsylvania constitution, so I don’t see a clear role for the Federal courts here.


16 posted on 11/28/2020 3:37:39 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
I’m pretty sure the legal challenge was based on the Pennsylvania constitution, so I don’t see a clear role for the Federal courts here.

I think that's right. There isn't really a federal controversy here.

23 posted on 11/28/2020 3:41:22 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
...clear role for the Federal courts here.

The Federal Constitution clearly says that State Legislatures are souly responsible for election laws . Those laws were altered by entities other than the Legislatures. Altered, we now know , to make it easier to steal elections.

32 posted on 11/28/2020 3:46:24 PM PST by Nateman (Democracy dies with vote fraud darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

The supreme court rulings before the election were based upon that states constitution. If the constitution of pennsylvania says one thing, the state supreme court cannot do another. If it goes to the supreme court, they will back the state constitution


98 posted on 11/28/2020 5:09:09 PM PST by joe fonebone (Communists Need To Be Eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson