Matt Braynard Posts Election Fraud FIndings - 42m Video

Voter Integrity Project ^ | 11-24-2020 | Matt Braynard

[Heavyrunner]

This is a long, but very concise and clear video with one persuasive conclusion. This patriot is doing God's work!

[Monterrosa-24]

Marked for viewing.

[ConjunctionJunction]

Do you have a synopsis?

[Steve Van Doorn]

wow 44% of those that have “voted” was called and said they never asked for the ballot and did not vote.

[PGR88]

bump for later

[BunnySlippers]

Same here!

[UpInArms]

4L8R

[Tunehead54]

4 AM - Thanks.

[HollyB]

Thank you. I’m sharing it in my circleS too.

Good to hear lawyers and congress has the information as well.

[BigEdLB]

THere are so many folks working on so many different aspects of the Usurper Biden’s shenanigans, The thing that was the most telling was the using of a non USPS post office box as a residence. Bongino as talking about this earlier as well

[HollyB]

Way too much info. Perhaps he has some charts posted on twitter and Parler. The links To them are at the video.

[Taxman]

Ping

[bitt]

p

[JoSixChip]

Way too much info. Perhaps he has some charts posted on twitter and Parler. The links To them are at the video.

It seems to that the info is spoon fed so slowly and transparently that my wife should understand it. That being said, I wish he would stick with numbers. He used terms like "very very small" and "a significant number" when he has the actual number at hand. Also, this is enough to expose the murkiness of the fraud. It is not conclusive enough to over turn an election. But it is more then enough for probable cause that should result in discovery. No, I'm not a lawyer. But I did sleep on the couch last night.

[HollyB]

He will be releasing the full reports soon. He has the charts on the video. And he explains them too. I’m pretty grateful for his outstanding work.

[HollyB]

This is just one piece of a large puzzle with the puzzle being election fraud.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

He only had a sampling so he doesn't know the real numbers. That's why he used vague terms. Unfortunately, I believe that this can be construed however the judges wish to.

If they want Biden to win they will see that there may have been some fraud, but it was done on an individual basis and didn't affect the results.

If they want Trump to win then this will be sufficient to eliminate huge amounts of votes from the final tally or call for a revote.

If they just want to go along to get along (e.g. Gorsuch, Roberts, and Kavanaugh) then they will side with the Biden supporters.

[JoSixChip]

Lets see where it goes. I too am grateful for his teams and his efforts.

[funfan]

Wow is right.

[Basket_of_Deplorables]

Bump for later