Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Posted on 11/22/2020 12:25:50 PM PST by george76
The Trump campaign said they're looking forward to taking the case to the Supreme Court. Here is their statement from President Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, and Trump Campaign Senior Legal Adviser Jenna Ellis:
Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.
"We will be seeking an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit. There is so much evidence that in Pennsylvania, Democrats eliminated our opportunity to present 50 witnesses and other evidence that election officials blatantly ignored Pennsylvania’s law denying independent review. This resulted in 682,777 ballots being cast illegally, wittingly or unwittingly. This is just an extension of the Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know.
"We are disappointed we did not at least get the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing. Unfortunately the censorship continues. We hope that the Third Circuit will be as gracious as Judge Brann in deciding our appeal one way or the other as expeditiously as possible. This is another case that appears to be moving quickly to the United States Supreme Court.”
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
“Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated,” the Obama appointee wrote.
Everything you need to know right there.
Relatively cordial thus far....
In other words he crime was too big to fail...
The election "officials" disenfranchised 70+ million US voters through their fraud!
Exactly correct We are now a banana republic or more precisely a Soviet Union. As Stalin said ( accurately as we see). Voters don’t decide elections. Those that count the votes do.
No problem.
In Sidney we trust.
Every illegal vote suppresses a legal vote.
None of these early losses mean anything - the game should and will be played out in the Supreme Court......
“no rules regarding the “curing” of ballots”
Sounds like a teenager’s technical excuse. If they wanted people to fix their ballots, it would have been in the legislation. Was there anything in the legislation that stated that a voter could only vote once? If not, then how many times you vote won’t matter.
Well that's completely inaccurate. What they are doing is pointing out that when someone sh*ts in the soup, it doesn't really matter who did it, the soup is no longer soup.
Also, the point is that nobody really knows if these are real votes or fake votes, and letting it stand is what disenfranchises 7 million voters.
Every illegal vote suppresses a legal vote.
EXACTLY,
(HOW did I know that the Judge was a BHO-appointed DIMocRAT??)
Yours, TMN78247
But Rudy says that they had 50 witnesses ready to testify but were not allowed to testify. So, you won't find fraud if you keep your head buried in the sand.
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Their risk is if the Supremes select not to hear the case.
So the bigger the fraud the more impossible to invalidate the fraud. Sort of like banks too big to fail. Just prop up anything that can’t make it on its own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.