Posted on 11/22/2020 7:08:59 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
Pennsylvania officials can certify election results that currently show Democrat Joe Biden winning the state by more than 80,000 votes, a federal judge ruled Saturday, dealing President Donald Trump's campaign another blow in its effort to invalidate the election.
Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani told Newsmax TV's Mark Halperin via text Saturday night the expedited dismissal is helpful for filing an expedited appeal and potentially raising the case to the Supreme Court.
Campaign senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis also pointed to the decision as a positive development in their effort to push the case relatively quickly to the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, they said they would seek an expedited appeal to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
I read the opinion. It is harsh. Very harsh.
They need to work fast. That decision will not be overturned by anyone other than possibly SCOTUS...
The faster it gets to the Supremes, the Better.
I keep praying
The law has a severabilty clause . someone here laid out the argument to make. It looks like trumps lawyer didnt do it..but i didnt read their filing.
Can anybody identify one precinct in which the Republicans were blocking access to Democrats, boarding up windows and doing funny business in the middle of the night after everybody went to bed?
This is all on the Democrats. They have been pulling these shenanigans for decades and it's time this gets exposed for all to see.
I have full confidence that Trump won re-election easily.
The 80000 still amazes me. They over did it with the fake ballots. I guess they know that one blow of 100000’s of ballots taken away will swing it.
The opinion was harsh and nonsensical in at least one major way - it claimed that nothing of this scope was ever attempted to question/remedy an election before - while ignoring that nothing of this scope of fraud has ever occurred before...
“Judge” is saying that since nobody’s ever cheated so many voters before, he can’t countenance stopping the cheat because it might....cheat someone.
There won’t be an honest decision until Supreme Court trues the vote. We never expected state or lower courts to reverse the Election Theft. State courts corrupt and lower fed courts too timid to render any justice for voters— why bother when it will go to Supreme Court anyway?
A lot of mischief can happen when you mail out 80 MILLION ballots. An 80,000 discrepancy is a drop in the bucket in the grand scheme. Heck, Trump brought out more than 80,000 to his PA rallies alone.
I read the opinion. It is harsh. Very harsh.
*************
Only a partisan hack would defend long histories of vote fraud in cities like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
The judge is defending the indefensible.
You summed it up nicely. Good post.
This is one reason I don’t get how people can think any of this is right. It’s so obvious and in your face. Let the truth out.
It’s good that he’s trying, but the Circuit Court that PA reports to sucks for Trump...so he’ll probably not have much luck there. WI and MI are much better.
After the fraud has happened it is too late to do a thing about it. Once they had their scheme and put their plan in motion, it was then that they had to be stopped, before a single ballot was cast. Trump told us all they were going to do this. I suppose he was talked into a strategy of suing after the fact. Oh well.
When this happened and many told me, “we will get them in the Courts.” I said “good luck.”
Judges are spineless creatures, always looking for a way to either avoid work or avoid making a big decision or looking for the outcome they want while having a clerk dress it up with some of that “law stuff.”
Oh, make no mistake, if the shoe were on the other foot right now, a leftist judge would be “all in.”
As to this case, it is just silly. The Judge will decry not wanting to disenfranchise voters by invalidating “BALLOTS” but ignore the fact that if those ballots contain numerous FRAUDULENT votes they do exactly that, you have disenfranchised legal voters. You have taken their choice and invalidated it.
So, we have a Judge putting on a blindfold, proclaiming, “I don’t see anything here” and then decrying the futility of the Trump campaign’s case.
And the casualty? It is votes that have been vitiated in favor of ballots. Now, it is about collecting ballots. Now, our elections are a race to the bottom to see how can cheat better.
It’s lazy and cowardly as hell. But it is what you can expect all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Republican judge
If you dont make the case on the severabilty clause ..you are a shitty lawyer. Legislature passed a law.
Con law case. Make con law arguments
The Third is GOP appointee controlled. It will depend on the panel. But I suspect that they will get clobbered as most of the GOP appointees are GOPe ones.
This just in:
Our elections are now won by who can get the most ballots. And anyone can make as many of those as they need to.
Yeeeeee haw, it’s the wild Wild West version of ballot rodeo!! Volunteer today and start cranking em out fellas.
And when that is over with, it’s vote by text!!!
How low can we go!!!
You will never get a judge to toss ballots
Why don’t we print up 100,000 Trump ballots that just happened to get found in a ditch some place?
That is how you win
That is how the Dems do it
Smiles. The DNC Ginsburg gambit folded we will soon see just how important this was
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.