Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/21/2020 7:22:05 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not really the guy I want on my team.


2 posted on 11/21/2020 7:23:32 PM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wary inkterestink


3 posted on 11/21/2020 7:24:12 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah. Let’s not go down that rabbit hole.


5 posted on 11/21/2020 7:24:29 PM PST by shadowlands1960 (“Some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again.” CSL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Must be why TX SoS examiners said it was junk. Took a dominion guy/gal three times to try and setup the system.


6 posted on 11/21/2020 7:24:36 PM PST by Pollard (Bunch of curmudgeons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sidney Powell has been rhetorically asking “so who actually designed this software” in her press conferences, teasing that it’s not actually Smartmatic and she knows the answer. The inference has so far been the CIA, but whoever it was there’s apparently something unexpected coming about where the actual algorithms originated.


7 posted on 11/21/2020 7:27:16 PM PST by Golden Eagle (List of Cable News Alternatives ----> http://freerepublic.com/~goldeneagle/ <----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sure, and he was in cahoots with Count Chocula and the Easter Bunny.

Listening to all this crazy nonsense convinces me that it’s over, we lost.


8 posted on 11/21/2020 7:27:16 PM PST by dinodino ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I call BS. When has Microsoft made something that really worked? 😉


9 posted on 11/21/2020 7:30:14 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If that were true it should have plenty of bugs.


10 posted on 11/21/2020 7:30:43 PM PST by calenel (Tree of Liberty is thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

According to this, and other similar articles, Microsoft Election Guard was just released in 2019. Lots of details there, including partnering with current voting systems vendors, and even the Department of Defense:

Microsoft, Partners Unveil “ElectionGuard” Tools For Voters To Track Their Ballots

https://editions.lib.umn.edu/electionacademy/2019/05/07/microsoft-partners-unveil-election-guard-tools-for-voters-to-track-their-ballots/


11 posted on 11/21/2020 7:32:15 PM PST by Golden Eagle (List of Cable News Alternatives ----> http://freerepublic.com/~goldeneagle/ <----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ll give this consideration when I hear it from Sidney.


12 posted on 11/21/2020 7:32:29 PM PST by OKSooner (BLOAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well now that would go a long way toward explaining how Microsoft stopped being an evil monopoly when Bill started kissing rat ass.


13 posted on 11/21/2020 7:34:19 PM PST by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Here’s the ElectionGuard open source community collaborative site:

https://www.electionguard.vote/

A well known liberal group VotingWorks is listed as a partner at the bottom, and has connections to Soros etc.

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/voting-works/


17 posted on 11/21/2020 7:38:49 PM PST by Golden Eagle (List of Cable News Alternatives ----> http://freerepublic.com/~goldeneagle/ <----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

DON’T TELL US YOU HAVE EVIDENCE... SHOW US THE DAM EVIDENCE


20 posted on 11/21/2020 7:42:02 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Seriously this stuff is getting into so much conspiracy I don’t know what to believe anymore and I’m afraid the Dems and Chi-coms are contributing this crap to throw us off the trail. I’m just hanging my hopes on Sydney and Rudy.


24 posted on 11/21/2020 7:51:26 PM PST by willk (A bias news media is not a free press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Almost any laser printer, can be connected to certain types of Dominion vote machines, and used to print ballots.

Dominion *software* will not only run on Dominion machines, but also on *other vote machines.*

Dominion *software* affords some Dominion machines (and other machines) an ability to perform a surprising amount of data manipulation and preparation for statistical analysis.

That, being way beyond the necessity of keeping vote marking and vote tabulation, simple, for the sake of integrity.

You may imagine, in the modern computing world, that:

a) because computers can do it

b) people who make computer program -driven devices

c) cannot stop themselves from making complex systems

d) *because they can.*

And so, Dominion drilled down, into what were once-upon-a-time simple vote marking machines in concept and operation, and also into tabulation machines, and had made them to be feature-ridden playgrounds.

- - -

Dominion - Democracy Suite(R) EMS Results Tally & Reporting User Guide (Version: 5.11-CO::7) of May 28, 2019.

https://www.oann.com/files/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf

There are several pages regarding “Ranked Contests” and “Ranked Choice Voting” (RCV).

Controls and features of that, are part of the software.

In the following “EXCERPT”, I am going to separate sentences of the FIRST PARAGRAPH, in order to make it easier to read and consider.

EXCERPT:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CHAPTER 11: RANKED CHOICE VOTING

11.1 Introduction

[FIRST PARAGRAPH]

Ranked choice voting (RCV) allows voters to rank their candidates in order of preference from first to last ranking, which is different compared to traditional forms of voting where the voter can only express equal preference for one or more candidates by marking their voting box.

This additional information that the ranking provides can be processed using different ways to declare one or more winner in a way to ensure elected candidates receive a majority of the vote.

What most of these methods have in common is that they process the results in rounds.

In the initial round only the first ranked candidates are evaluated, if any candidate achieves the majority of the votes these are elected.

Otherwise, another round starts and candidates with the lowest amount of votes are eliminated.

Those ballots get redistributed according to their subsequent rankings, and votes are evaluated to determine winners.

This process avoids the need to do run-off elections, while still ensuring candidates receive a majority of the vote.

[SECOND PARAGRAPH]

There are various forms of RCV supported in EMS and each variation has a number of settings which are managed through Ranked Profiles.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

As I look at the manual, it does seem, that DESPITE RCV not being authorized by a jurisdiction (national, state, local), RCV can certainly be enabled.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Also, I found an Excel workbook at:

https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/DVS-DemocracySuite511/requirementsMatrix.xlsx

It is the State of Colorado’s attempt to corral the complexity of the problems created - because developers and manipulators can.


26 posted on 11/21/2020 7:57:12 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Link won’t load for me.

Lame.


27 posted on 11/21/2020 7:58:34 PM PST by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Software doesn’t design itself.


35 posted on 11/21/2020 8:09:16 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Funny thing is they probably wouldn't have been caught accept for the fact that Trump was in the middle of a landslide and the algorithm they thought they could use - ya know because they believed their polls that Trump could not possibly beat Trump - did not work. The soft steal was a total bust.

Mad scramble ensued and they got caught blue-handed.

48 posted on 11/21/2020 9:17:46 PM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Been waiting with baited breath for Stone to show up.

Don’t discount this, it was prophcied in 2014.


49 posted on 11/21/2020 9:24:29 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Doubtful that Gates does any coding these eras.


52 posted on 11/21/2020 9:40:15 PM PST by DennisR (Look around. God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson