Posted on 11/12/2020 2:27:45 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe
In a stunning filing on Tuesday, November 10, potential intervenors in the Trump campaign’s lawsuit against the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, proved one of the allegations of illegality the Trump campaign brought forth in their initial complaint against the Secretary and several boards of elections.
The Trump Campaign alleges that in contravention of election law, certain precincts reached out to mail-in and absentee voters to “cure” their ballots before election day, or fix errors that would have otherwise made their votes invalid. On page 35 of the complaint, found in full here, the Trump campaign spells out election law that was recently affirmed this year in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, as it pertains to mail-in ballots.
A large part of the case filed by the Trump campaign explains in detail how the Secretary of State in Pennsylvania sent out guidance to election boards, instructing them to ignore the law. According to the lawsuit, there was no even adherence to the law; some counties followed it, while others, namely in Democrat strongholds, did not.
On November 10, a number of organizations filed a joint motion to intervene in the case, and along with their filing, which suggests that these ballots should remain or risk disenfranchisement, were several affidavits from voters who swear under penalty of perjury that they were, in fact, contacted by County Board of Elections officials before the election, in order to cure their ballots of errors. This is in direct violation of Pennsylvania law and is one of the arguments the Trump campaign makes in its complaint against the state.
Witness Natalie Price swore: “…Between Sunday and Monday, November 1 and 2, I received three calls from the Democratic Party notifying me my ballot had been rejected. I asked why and they told me they didn’t know. They instructed me to visit the voting center in Norristown to cure it. I never received a call from any election official to inform me that my ballot had been rejected. The first site I visited in Norristown was a drop-off only site. They told me that I had to go to another site to see and cure my actual ballot. At that second site, I learned that my ballot had been marked as defective because I did not write my name and address in non-cursive print. I was not aware that I was supposed to hand-write my name and address in non-cursive print, next to where the information was preprinted on the envelope. Because that exact information was already there, I understood it would have been redundant to write it out again. My ballot was signed, dated, and otherwise complied with all other ballot instructions. To cure my ballot I showed the county employee (emphasis ours) my ID, added my information next to where it was pre-printed, and left…”
Below are some more examples of the same, for witness Joesph Ayeni:
Witness Meril Lara
The examples continue. The Judge in the case has set a scheduling deadline of today for motions of injunctive release and motions to dismiss, with Oral Argument scheduled for 11/17 at 1:30 PM, and an evidentiary hearing on 11/19 at 10:00 AM.
Tracy Beanz is the Editor in Chief at UncoverDC. You can find her on Twitter @tracybeanz
(There are links in the text at the source -- I didn't feel like doing all the embedding.)
I didn’t know Election Officials could Share Vote Information with Political Parties?? She said the DEMONRAT Party called her?? How exactly did they come across this information that made them Call Her??
If I didn’t know any better, this is what we used to call Conspiracy to Commit Election FRAUD, and it is a serious FELONY for all involved.
” Secretary of State in Pennsylvania sent out guidance to election boards, instructing them to ignore the law.”
How very....Democrat Party...of him.
Lara needs to watch her back at Fox!
9 Nov: Tweet: Lara Logan, investigative journalist, “No Agenda” Fox Nation
Dominion voting
The DELIAN Project: Democracy through Technology | Clinton Foundation
from replies:
12E: Spell DELIAN backwards. Then add HAMMER.
https://twitter.com/laralogan/status/1325515987454742528
have wondered previously if Delian/Dominion is HAMR (THE HAMMER).
The Delian Project: 2011-2012 News & Views
November 2011
MUNICIPAL COUNCILORS PENSION FUND, DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA
On 25 November 2011 the initial “proof of concept” election technology pilot was undertaken by the future founders of the DELIAN Project, in collaboration with the Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA). The local election was in support of the City of Durban’s Municipal Councilors Pension Fund in South Africa.
December 2011
POST-CONFLICT ELECTION RESEARCH EXPEDITION, TRIPOLI, LIBYA
Following the Libyan revolution of 2011, a three-person Canadian election research expedition was sent to Tripoli to meet with senior representatives of the National Transition Council (NTC). DELIAN’s future founders were tasked with identifying what form of democratic government structure the NTC was considering.
April 2012
Following a six-month trial “proof of concept” period, the DELIAN Project was formally launched in Toronto, Ontario as a Canadian registered not-for-profit, Non-Governmental Organization (NGO). The Chair of DELIAN’s Board of Directors is the past CEO of Elections Ontario, John Hollins, while its Senior Advisor is Jean-Pierre Kingsley, past CEO of Elections Canada and a former President of IFES.
June 2012
At the request of the UNESCO Special Envoy to Haiti, Jean-Pierre Kingsley led a two-person election technology assessment team to Porte-au-Prince from 11-14 June 2012. Various stakeholders were engaged, including the Government of Haiti, OAS, UNDP, the Embassy of Canada, and the UN Peacekeeping force MINUSTAH...
https://www.delianproject.org/news-2011-2012
Clinton Foundation: Clinton Global Initiative: Commitment to Action: The DELIAN Project: Democracy through Technology
Commitment by DELIAN Project
In 2014, Dominion Voting committed to providing emerging and post-conflict democracies with access to voting technology through its philanthropic support to the DELIAN Project, as many emerging democracies suffer from post-electoral violence due to the delay in the publishing of election results. Over the next three years, Dominion Voting will support election technology pilots with donated Automated Voting Machines (AVM), providing an improved electoral process, and therefore safer elections. As a large number of election staff are women, there will be an emphasis on training women, who will be the first to benefit from the skills transfer training and use of AVMs
DETAILS
The election technology being offer under the DELIAN Project are paper based, optical scan tabulators, manufactured and donated by Dominion Voting (Industry name: ICP-322)...
The AVMs being donated to DELIAN have been used in several large jurisdictions such as Canada, the United States, the Philippines, and Mongolia...
The DELIAN Project will launch in October 2014 with an election technology pilot in Guyana. This will be followed by additional support to emerging and post-conflict democracies, including the facilitation of technology and skill transfer training, in at least one to two Caribbean jurisdictions annually. The current implementation plan for DELIAN is forecast through 2019.
Three sample election technology pilots have been undertaken in recent months to validate the DELIAN concept. These took place in Durban, South Africa; Tbilisi, Georgia; and Kingston, Jamaica...
Progress Reports
Since the launch of the commitment in September 2014, Dominion Voting have supported a a number of research-based election technology pilots with donated equipment and expertise. These include pilots at the University of Guyana on October 2nd, 2014, the University of West Indies (Barbados) on March 12th, 2015, the University of West Indies (Jamaica) on March 19th, 2015, and the National Union of Public Workers (Barbados) on April 1st, 2015.
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative/commitments/delian-project-democracy-through-technology
Great Game India describes itself as “Journal on Geopolitics & International Relations”:
9 Nov: Great Game India: INVESTIGATION: Did Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems Rigged The US Elections 2020
A so-called computer “glitch” in the voting machines flipping votes during the 2020 US Elections has caused a major controversy. The source and ownership of the voting machines used in the elections has become an urgent issue because of real fears that hackers, whether foreign or domestic, might tamper with the mechanics of the voting system. However, GreatGameIndia has found that the vendors and not hackers maybe behind the rigging. One of the vendors, a Denver-based Canadian Crown Agent company Dominion Voting Systems has a long history of allegation of election rigging and interference in elections of various nations, including census data theft in India and interference in US Elections of 2020...
Clinton Foundation’s DELIAN Project
The Dominion Voting Systems is tied to the Clinton Global Initiative through the DELIAN Project...
Further, in 2015 Washington Post reported that Dominion Voting Systems donated between $25,001 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation...
Documents in possession of GreatGameIndia also revealed an insidious conspiracy by these companies to smuggle biometric and demographic data of Indians collected during a Pilot Project initiated under National Population Register to Taiwan. Such sensitive data in the wrong hands in a foreign country could not just result in identity theft but pose a threat to India’s National Security since the same companies are also manufacturers of election voting machines...
https://greatgameindia.com/dominion-voting-systems-rigged-us-elections/
what was the purpose of including these stories . seems pretty damn stupid. did the organizations hire a lawyer?
i listened to the audio of this woman talking about the filing. she said she had to read it several times to make sure she was reading it right.
some of the Delian mob. worth noting and researching.
2020 election looks more and more like a continuation of the COUP against President Trump:
23 Jan 2014: Kaieteur News Guyana: Guyana mulls introduction of automatic ballot counting system
According to GECOM, on Monday, a team of the DELIAN Project, an independent, non-profit organization registered in Canada, and the United States of America, met with its officials and conducted a demonstration on the use of automatic ballot scan and tabulation technology.
The DELIAN team comprised Jean-Pierre Kingsley, Chief Executive Officer of the International Foundation of electoral systems and currently Chairman of the DELIAN’s Advisory Board. He has served as the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada from 1997 to 2010. The team also included John Hollins, Chairman of the DELIAN Board of Directors, who was Chief Electoral Officer for the Province of Ontario form 2001 to 2008, and Allan Best, Managing Director.The DELIAN Project was created in 2011 as a philanthropic entity by the Canadian elections technology firm, Dominion Voting Systems (DVS). The Project procures and donates electoral technology to emerging and growing democracies.
DELIAN is a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact, and recently joined the Clinton Global Initiative...
https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2014/01/23/guyana-mulls-introduction-of-automatic-ballot-counting-system/
That’s true because someone else voted for them. Duh.
Witold J. Walczak is the lawyer for the motion. ACLU
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
“They have nothing that would satisfy the level of proof that you need in a court of law,” Walczak said
He does now.
bkmk
Apparently the US Supreme Court will have to decide whether or not voter fraud occurred.
p
Think mirror.
HAMMER
I was about to comment that the substance of the witness testimony didn't substantiate the headline (since she was never contacted by any election officials). Until I read your comment....
A very good question! How in hell would the Democrat party know a ballot needed "curing" unless supposedly neutral election officials were sharing info with the Democrat party?! Did the Republican party receive any such referrals from these election officials? If not, why not?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.